Home » Daily Dose

Free Burma!

4 October 2007 420 Comments

Free Burma!

Free Burma 01

Read the Inquirer editorial, Battle for Burma, and Alex Magno’s column, Emergency. Asia Sentinel has Horror in Burma, and asks, Where are Burma’s Monks?

The Irrawaddy News Magazine Burma Protests page has continuous updates. So does More on Burma in the Guardian Unlimited.

420 Comments »

  • Beancurd said:

    Yes, free Burma! And in order not to disappoint or discourage would-be supporters or symphatizers of free Burma campaign, somebody should better ask ate Glue to shut up and that she just work silently behind the scenes.

  • BrianB said:

    Why we are never s brutal as these people (Burmese, Indonesians) is our choice to be gullible of being hard headed.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    BrianB, Filipinos are much averse to bloodshed. hence it took 300 years b4 Filipinos can even contemplate a revolution agst the Spaniards. It took 14 years of Martial Law before Filipinos could even muster the courage to mass on the streets. People Power 1 might’ve been peaceful, but peaceful only bec the men holding guns were unwilling to fire on their own countrymen.

    i think that’s the large difference between our soldiers and other countries’ soldiers. foreign soldiers inculcation of the “state” as all, and the only thing that matters, means these soldiers have completed their transformation as mere tools of their state. while our soldiers still retain some sense of individualism not controlled by the state.

    a blessing in times of oppressive regimes that may order wholesale slaughter of massed civilians in protest, but a bane for continued stability as coup after coups rock the nation anytime the soldiers get it in their head to be the nation’s “savior.”

  • cvj said:

    I for one, am proud of our military for refusing to fire on our people during the EDSAs, unlike Tiananmen before and Burma today (which is not to say that they’re completely clean).

  • frombelow said:

    Free Burma. ??? Charity begins at home.

  • BURAOT said:

    As I have said, we should constantly watch those who hold the gun. Civilian rule, however corrupt thay maybe, should always be superior to the military.

  • frombelow said:

    Charity begins at home. Burma is in peril. But how about us.

  • ramrod said:

    Code of Conduct of the Filipino Soldier

    1. I am a Filipino Soldier .I will support and
    defend the constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.

    2. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will fight all forces
    that would destroy the freedom of the Filipino People.

    3. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will obey the law,
    legal orders and decrees of my lawful superiors at all times.

    4. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will fight and die in the
    true Filipino tradition of valor, honor, duty and loyalty.

    To all these I pledge my life, my treasure and my sacred honor.

  • ramrod said:

    “BrianB, Filipinos are much averse to bloodshed. hence it took 300 years b4 Filipinos can even contemplate a revolution agst the Spaniards.” DevilsAdvc8

    Also, the Spaniards’ effective use of “divide and conquer” and yes religion transformed the savage natives (Lapu-Lapu types) into docile subjects, they also brainwashed the affluent natives to look, act, talk, and even think like spaniards and look down on the lowly indios. With education, the Filipinos became aware, I believe one of the books Andres Bonifacio was able to read was “Uncle Tom’s Cabin.” Of course, JPR came into the picture plus several equally brave and educated hero types and the rest is history.

  • frombelow said:

    “I for one, am proud of our military for refusing to fire on our people during the EDSAs, unlike Tiananmen before and Burma today (which is not to say that they’re completely clean).”

    is that the only meausurement. how about propping up a scandalous regime, aside from becoming a tool in some election “fraud.”

    Was their refusal to fire on civilians something to be proud of, or were the soldiers playing politics then?

    I do not advocate an armed forces killing its own people. My point is their acts in the past two EDSAs should be the gauge, not in its greatness but, but its lack in iron-clad discipline other armies have.

    Imagine an army not imposing the will of the state just because there are people on the streets.

    By the way, how about duing the siege of Malacanang on May 1, 2001 by Erap loyalists? They shot civilians then. Ah, selective .

  • cvj said:

    Frombelow, they also shot civilians during the Mendiola Massacre so, as i said above, our military is not entirely clean, but they don’t compare with the Chinese PLA in Tiananmen and the Burmese military today. This is why a peaceful change of government was possible during EDSA and EDSA Dos. I give them credit for their clear sense of mission which is to protect the Filipino people.

    Just to clarify, i’m not proud of the generals and other officers who prop up this illegitimate regime and engage in extrajudicial killings.

  • ramrod said:

    “Was their refusal to fire on civilians something to be proud of, or were the soldiers playing politics then?”

    If I remember it right the marines commander at the time was Gen. Artemio Tadiar, he had his orders to shoot from Gen. Ver, but he did not give the order. These were unarmed civilians and clergymen bringing flowers, singing songs of peace and hope – it would be cowardly to shoot then. During Erap’s EDSA, the military was attacked by an uncontrollable mob hurling stones, carrying sticks, maybe even knives – they had to defend themselves. This travesty of EDSA was violent and destructive, it was more of a riot than a people’s organized movement.

  • TDC said:

    In The Quiet Land
    (By Daw Aung San Suu Kyi:NOBEL PEACE PRIZE winner;elected president but imprisoned by the military dictatorship)

    In the Quiet Land, no one can tell
    if there’s someone who’s listening
    for secrets they can sell.
    The informers are paid in the blood of the land
    and no one dares speak what the tyrants won’t stand.

    In the quiet land of Burma,
    no one laughs and no one thinks out loud.
    In the quiet land of Burma,
    you can hear it in the silence of the crowd

    In the Quiet Land, no one can say
    when the soldiers are coming
    to carry them away.
    The Chinese want a road; the French want the oil;
    the Thais take the timber; and SLORC takes the spoils…

    In the Quiet Land….
    In the Quiet Land, no one can hear
    what is silenced by murder
    and covered up with fear.
    But, despite what is forced, freedom’s a sound

  • ramrod said:

    Everybody:

    Its starting. It just a matter of increasing cognitive dissonance.

    Army major defects from Burma

    Oslo (dpa) – While telephone and internet connections with Burma remained difficult Wednesday, a former army major who fled to neighbouring Thailand said he defected since he did not want to shoot at civilians and monks.

    Swedish radio news and Oslo daily Aftenposten published the interview with Major Win and his son who arrived in Bangkok Tuesday after five days on the run from Burma.

    “If he had refused to obey orders, he would have been killed,” the major’s 17-year-old son said.

    Father and son said they hoped to seek asylum in Norway or Sweden.

    Win said he had heard rumours of some 200 killed during the protests, but had not witnessed any killings and could not confirm the numbers.

    The Oslo-based opposition radio station Democratic Voice of Burma on Tuesday said it had received accounts suggesting some 200 people were killed but underlined that the figures were difficult to check.

    Official Burmese tallies suggest some 10 people were killed.

    Earlier, the Oslo-based station’s news editor Moe Aye told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa that telephone connections with Burma were difficult.

    Some telephone numbers in the former capital Rangoon were out of order while it was not possible to get through to other cities, he said, adding that the internet connection was irregular.

    Another development was that the army was trying to force people to give food and money.

    “They raid markets for pork and chickens,” he said, adding that shopowners were afraid to open their shops.

    Raids included a market in Hlaingthayar on the outskirts of Rangoon.

  • ramrod said:

    Everybody:

    Its starting. It just a matter of increasing cognitive dissonance.

    Army major defects from Burma

    Oslo (dpa) – While telephone and internet connections with Burma remained difficult Wednesday, a former army major who fled to neighbouring Thailand said he defected since he did not want to shoot at civilians and monks.

    Swedish radio news and Oslo daily Aftenposten published the interview with Major Win and his son who arrived in Bangkok Tuesday after five days on the run from Burma.

    “If he had refused to obey orders, he would have been killed,” the major’s 17-year-old son said.

    Father and son said they hoped to seek asylum in Norway or Sweden.

    Win said he had heard rumours of some 200 killed during the protests, but had not witnessed any killings and could not confirm the numbers.

    The Oslo-based opposition radio station Democratic Voice of Burma on Tuesday said it had received accounts suggesting some 200 people were killed but underlined that the figures were difficult to check.

    Official Burmese tallies suggest some 10 people were killed.

    Earlier, the Oslo-based station’s news editor Moe Aye told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa that telephone connections with Burma were difficult.

    Some telephone numbers in the former capital Rangoon were out of order while it was not possible to get through to other cities, he said, adding that the internet connection was irregular.

    Another development was that the army was trying to force people to give food and money.

    “They raid markets for pork and chickens,” he said, adding that shopowners were afraid to open their shops.

    Raids included a market in Hlaingthayar on the outskirts of Rangoon.

  • ramrod said:

    Stupefy!

  • pong said:

    ramrod,

    Is the Code of Conduct pledged to in the order of importance?

    Defending the constitution(1)is more important for a soldier than adhering to the chain of command(3)?

    “1. I am a Filipino Soldier . FIRST and FOREMOST I will support and defend the constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.”

    “3. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will obey the law,
    legal orders and decrees of my lawful superiors at all times.”

    This does not mean blind obedience. But blind obedience is in fact being demanded of soldiers who question the origin of the chain of command — the commander-in chief — as being in clear and present violation of the constitution which they have sworn to support and defend.

    Under the present circumstance, a declaration of ‘withdrawal of support’ to the commander-in-chief by soldiers breaking out of he chain of command is not the appropriate declaration. The declaration should simply be, “I hereby honor my pledge to support and to defend the constitution.”

  • Harry said:

    i wonder where karah is. been waiting for her. maybe she got irritated with me.

    harry

  • ramrod said:

    pong,

    Yes, it is in the order of importance. The premise is that “civilian authority” is superior to military authority.

  • ramrod said:

    harry,

    Probably sleeping, she was complaining of eyebags earlier.

  • ramrod said:

    Under the present circumstance, a declaration of ‘withdrawal of support’ to the commander-in-chief by soldiers breaking out of he chain of command is not the appropriate declaration. The declaration should simply be, “I hereby honor my pledge to support and to defend the constitution.”

    Its just a shame this “code” is not included in the “articles of war,” – Querubin and company could have been vindicated.

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    she got addicted with the blog and now she’s recharging. last night, it was already 1am (rp time) and she’s still actively responding to comments.

    if you have a globe postpaid and a 3G or 3.5G phone, i think the web services is quite fast. the only problem is that you have to pay per kb, not based on time usage.

    i’ve got globe and pldt for my dsl purposes and so far globe is cheaper and gives higher bandwidth. pldt’s service sucks with their centralized customer service. takes weeks before they get back to you.

  • TDC said:

    WE are ALL BURMESE!

  • ramrod said:

    tdc,

    Yes. We are all Burmese!
    Don’t worry, its starting, 1 major in the Burmese army has already defected, details I posted earlier.

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    she got addicted with the blog and now she’s recharging. last night, it was already 1am (rp time) and she’s still actively responding to comments.

    if you have a globe postpaid and a 3g or 3.5g phone, i think the web services is quite fast. the only problem is that you have to pay per kb, not based on time usage.

    i’ve got globe and pldt for my dsl purposes and so far globe is cheaper and gives higher bandwidth. pldt’s service sucks with their centralized customer service. takes weeks before they get back to you.

  • BrianB said:

    “i’ve got globe and pldt for my dsl purposes and so far globe is cheaper and gives higher bandwidth. pldt’s service sucks with their centralized customer service.”

    They all suck.

  • TDC said:

    RAMROD:
    Join the “Support the Monks’ protest in Burma”Group in FACEBOOK.317,000 members now and growing!

    WE ARE ALL BURMESE!

  • TDC said:

    Many monks who escaped arrest in the Burmese junta’s brutal crackdown on mass demonstrations in Rangoon and Mandalay are returning to their home villages in ethnic areas and joining armed resistance groups.

  • TDC said:

    Why do I have to fight???
    (By Daw Aung San Suu Kyi)

    They killed my father a year ago,
    And they burnt my hut after that
    I asked the city men “why me?” they ignored
    “I don’t know, mind your business,” the men said.
    One day from elementary school I came home,
    Saw my sister was lifeless, lying in blood.

    I looked around to ask what happened, if somebody’d known,
    Found no one but living room as a flood.
    Running away by myself on the village road,
    Not knowing where to go but heading for my teacher
    Realizing she’s the only one who could help to clear my throat,
    But this time she gave up, telling me strange things in fear.

    Why, teacher, why.. why.. why?
    I have no dad nor a sister left.
    To teach me and to care for me you said, was that a lie?
    This time with tearful eyes she, again, said…
    “Be a grown one, young man,
    Can’t you see we all are dying?
    And stop this with your might as soon as you can,
    For we all are suffering.”

  • BrianB said:

    “Filipinos are much averse to bloodshed”

    I think Indonesian men believe that laughing at tragedy is manly.

  • ramrod said:

    “if you have a globe postpaid and a 3g or 3.5g phone, i think the web services is quite fast. the only problem is that you have to pay per kb, not based on time usage.”

    I am using my phone for surfing problem is its very slow, so now I know its because its under Smart. I’m seriously thinking of switching to Globe now that you told me.

  • ramrod said:

    Harry,

    I think she is still in the other topic, or whatever its called.

  • ramrod said:

    RAMROD:
    Join the “Support the Monks’ protest in Burma”Group in FACEBOOK.317,000 members now and growing! – tdc

    Done!

  • ramrod said:

    Okay, I’m switching to Globe!

  • ramrod said:

    pong,

    You still here?

  • USpace said:

    FREE Burma!!!

    Bush slammed the UN and the rulers of Myanmar in his UN speech earlier this week.

    The UN must do something, but they never use military force to fight.
    That is a huge problem.

    Illegal drug fortunes are a BIG part of this.

    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe wants
    complete narco states

    criminals in power
    loving the corrupt drug war

    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    shoot peaceful protesters

    calling for democracy
    which you must never allow

    http://absurdthoughtsaboutgod.blogspot.com/

    :)
    .

  • ramrod said:

    Wingardium Leviosa!

  • ramrod said:

    The UN is toothless!!!

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    “i’ve got globe and pldt for my dsl purposes and so far globe is cheaper and gives higher bandwidth. pldt’s service sucks with their centralized customer service.”

    “They all suck.”

    and did you hear the laughable news govt is floating the idea that Globe and Smart now shoulder the NBN? amidst all their bad service? they can’t even straighten up their service with their paying customers so I don’t think they have the right to even dream of taking on that project!

    and much more PLDT! w/the worst record among the telcos providing internet service.

    i would protest even more violently if they continue to insist on pushing that NBN, with any of the private telcos in the Philippines. it will be pure incompetence!

  • ramrod said:

    DevilsAdvc8,

    I’ve called up “172″ so many times I think I probably talked to all the CSRs already.
    These telcos are charging the government too much for their services, they will not welcome an NBN operated by the government its loss revenue.

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    karah’s at the at other article titled kowtow. i don’t think she’ll comment in here because she knows i’m in here

    harry

  • vic said:

    Free Burma!!Free North Korea, Free the Philippines and the rest of the oppressed…

  • Pilipinoparin said:

    The “Desparates” insulted the Filipino health care professionals.

    Manolo, please allow me to post this petition….

    To: ABC

    To the producers of “Desperate Housewives” and ABC:

    We are writing to express concern and hurt about a racially-discriminatory comment made in an episode of Desperate Housewives on 9/30/07. In a scene in which Susan was told by her gynecologist that she might be hitting menopause, she replied, “Can I just check those diplomas because I just want to make sure that they are not from some med school in the Philippines.”

    As members and allies of the Filipino American community, we are writing to inform you that this type of derogatory remark was discriminatory and hurtful, and such a comment was not necessary to maintain any humor in the show. Additionally, a statement that devalues Filipinos in healthcare is extremely unfounded, considering the overwhelming presence of Filipinos and Filipino Americans in the medical field. Filipinos are the second largest immigrant population in the United States, with many entering the U.S. (and successfully passing their U.S. licensing boards!) as doctors, nurses, and medical technicians. In fact, the Philippines produces more U.S. nurses than any other country in the world. So, to belittle the education, experience, or value of Filipino Americans in health care is extremely disrespectful and plain and simply ignorant. Many of the hospitals in major metropolitan areas of the U.S. (and the world) would not be able to operate without its Filipino and Filipino American staff members.

    As Filipino Americans and allies, we band together to ensure that this type of hateful message should not be allowed to continue on our television and radio airwaves. Given the recent amounts of media attention that has been given to Michael Richards (against African Americans), Isaiah Washington (against gays), and Rosie O’Donnell (against Asian/ Chinese Americans), it is ridiculous that this type of hateful speech made it through various screenwriters, the show’s producers, the show’s actors, and ABC itself.

    We demand a public apology to the Filipino American community, and we demand the episode be edited to remove the ignorant and racist remark. We will not allow hateful messages against our community (or any other oppressed community) to continue.

    Sincerely,

    The Undersigned

    View Current Signatures

  • Bencard said:

    soldiers are soldiers. while in uniform and in possession of service weapons, they could not be politicians, government critics, opinion makers or lawyers. they are to defend the constitution and the constitutional government and its instrumentalities, even against the people who would try to overthrow them.

    soldiers who want to dabble in politics, or pursue careers as reformers, should first shed their uniforms, return their weapons, and seek discharge from the service. that’s the way it should be, that’s the way it is.

    refusal to fire on violent aggressors on the pretext of “defending the people” is a cop out, if not outright dereliction of duty.

  • Pilipinoparin said:

    “religion transformed the savage natives (Lapu-Lapu types)” per ramrod

    I don’t our forefathers were savages, they had their own religion, they were just trying to protect their territories from foreigners.

  • Pilipinoparin said:

    it should be ..I don’t think our forefathers….

    My apologies, Manolo

  • jaxius said:

    ramrod,

    a good read regarding the issue of officers and soldiers regarding their constitutional duty vis-a-vis the so-called “withdrawal of support” is an article in the Parameters journal of the US War College authored by Richard Swain. It is titled “The Ethics of Officership”. Try this link:

    http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/PARAMETERS/07spring/swain.htm

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    PilipinoPaRin, kindly refer to my blog, linked thru my name and read why I think it inane to keep on demanding what you are demanding.

    And just so you know, ABC has already issued their apology, and you should quit while you’re ahead. all fine to protest racial slurs or perceptions thereof, but to continue to beat a dead horse, your group risks showing us Filipinos as the more idiotic between ABC and Teri.

  • Pilipinoparin said:

    Devil,

    I don’t know about you but we still have our dignity and pride.

  • grd said:

    agree with devils. enough said.

  • BrianB said:

    “and did you hear the laughable news govt is floating the idea that Globe and Smart now shoulder the NBN? amidst all their bad service? they can’t even straighten up their service with their paying customers so I don’t think they have the right to even dream of taking on that project!”"

    Yan ang palagi kong sinasabi. Last time I talked to tech support, I had the lady on the other side pass a message from me to Ablaza. Forget the NBN project, concentrate on your current customers. Wag silang parang gubyerno, puro lubaklubak broadband nila.

  • USpace said:

    The show ‘Desperate Housewives’ didn’t criticize Filipino health professionals or people. They made a joke about the Philippine Medical School industry and its quality.

    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    get insulted easy

    http://absurdthoughtsaboutgod.blogspot.com/

    :)
    .

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    Pilipino, i too still have my dignity and pride. perhaps you didn’t read my article, but there’s a difference between bullheaded defense of false pride and respectable display of REAL pride.

    just watched FOX news, and golly, the americans are just laughing at us that no less than our president has had to rise at this perceived affront when local americans themselves don’t give jack shit when their own cities or localities are made the butt of jokes in TV shows and comedy bars.

    and as the anchor rightly said (not exact words):

    insensitive and hurtful? yes. but racial slur? i don’t think so. (and i agree)

    just rest your horses and accept the apology. isn’t that enough?

    as grd says, ’nuff said!

    BrianB, you wouldn’t believe the horror stories I heard abt our private telcos disservice to their customers. And when I mean OUR, I mean ALL of them. Even Bayantel who recently got glowing praises from other consumers is slowly morphing into the usual suspects. it’s OVERSUBSRIPTION is what it is. my blog carries a running campaign abt this. (how i’m willing to pay to jumpstart a class suit whenever i meet like-minded consumers) and just so you know, these telcos’ lock-in clause in their contracts are ANTI-TRUST. what’s NTC doing abt it? jack shit!

  • supremo said:

    Harry,

    “Stalking involves one person’s obsessive behavior toward another person. Initially, stalking will usually take the form of annoying, threatening, or obscene telephone calls, emails or letters. The calls may start with one or two a day but can quickly increase in frequency. Stalkers may conduct covert surveillance of the victim, following every move his target makes. Even the victim’s home may be staked out.”

    Think about it. You’re almost there.

  • nash said:

    Oo, while waiting for my fake transcript of records to be made in some recto university, I took time out to make a petition condemning the Burmese Junta….

    Oy tama na yang Pinoy jokes, Chinese and Bombay jokes naman dahil hindi sila pikon….

    Ewan ko ba, tao namamatay sa burma, mga peaceful oppositionists nagiging desaparecido sa Pinas, Iraq naghihirap, eh siningitan pa ng mga petitioners na ewan.

    Free Burma!

    (yung iba dyan ipagpatuloy ang panonood ng walang kwentang tv show)

  • ramrod said:

    “I don’t our forefathers were savages, they had their own religion, they were just trying to protect their territories from foreigners.” – Pilipinoparin

    Lapu-Lapu was literally “my” forefather, I was born and raised in Mactan. We do not take offense to being called savages, because its true we will “savagely” fight for what we believe in. In another country they have “berserkers,” fearsome warriors both “more than human” in strength, skill, and courage and “less than human” in their propensity to kill, behead, maim, torture, etc. to send a message to their enemies that they are not “pushover” tin soldiers.

  • ramrod said:

    “refusal to fire on violent aggressors on the pretext of “defending the people” is a cop out, if not outright dereliction of duty.” – Bencard

    Although I respect your opinion, I would like you to take some time to look at certain aspects of “soldiery.”
    If your idea of a soldier is limited to the movies you have been watching, or perhaps books yo have been reading – I will give you a guided tour albeit just briefly into a soldiers’ barracks.
    When you enter the door you will see written in very legible letters a certain “code” that is memorized, carved in the hearts and minds every soldier, a code that defines their very existence, the answer to the question “why am I here? what is my purpose?” and it goes like this:

    Code of Conduct of the Filipino Soldier

    1. I am a Filipino Soldier .I will support and
    defend the constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.

    2. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will fight all forces
    that would destroy the freedom of the Filipino People.

    3. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will obey the law,
    legal orders and decrees of my lawful superiors at all times.

    4. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will fight and die in the
    true Filipino tradition of valor, honor, duty and loyalty.

    To all these I pledge my life, my treasure and my sacred honor.

    I posted this last night to see if anyone will be able to use in, understand it, and realize “why” some of our soldiers and officers are behaving “weirdly” like Querubin and company. Someone commented (very sharp person) with this :

    pong :
    ramrod,

    Is the Code of Conduct pledged to in the order of importance?

    Defending the constitution(1)is more important for a soldier than adhering to the chain of command(3)?

    “1. I am a Filipino Soldier . FIRST and FOREMOST I will support and defend the constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.”

    “3. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will obey the law,
    legal orders and decrees of my lawful superiors at all times.”

    This does not mean blind obedience. But blind obedience is in fact being demanded of soldiers who question the origin of the chain of command — the commander-in chief — as being in clear and present violation of the constitution which they have sworn to support and defend.

    Under the present circumstance, a declaration of ‘withdrawal of support’ to the commander-in-chief by soldiers breaking out of he chain of command is not the appropriate declaration. The declaration should simply be, “I hereby honor my pledge to support and to defend the constitution.”

    I tried to communicate with this “pong” further but he was silent after that. I was curious because the only pong I know is Gen. Rodolfo “pong” Biazon.

    Anyway, there are people who actually put their lives on the line or “stick out their necks” literally for our sakes and sometimes we take for granted the “small liberties” no the “freedom!” that they provide under the mantle of their protection and we dare question the manner they execute it. You want the truth? You can’t handle the truth!

  • ramrod said:

    I like watching “Desperate Houswives,” the women are beautiful, sexy, smart, confident, and witty. Its high time somebody said something “truthful” about out Filipino doctors! Did we ever read or hear any doctors here sued for malpractice? (quack doctors really). They would rather protect themselves than face up to their mistakes. And what do we expect after the nursing exams “leakage” scandal? A pat on the back? Lets not kid ourselves to believing we have the “best” doctors because we don’t – “pretenders” now that we have a lot of. All this was blown out of proportion, is our ego so low that anyone can just step on it? Come on, we’re bigger than that, its too petty, not worth the effort really – maybe it was just “misdirection” as some of you perceptively pointed out?

  • ramrod said:

    “BrianB, you wouldn’t believe the horror stories I heard abt our private telcos disservice to their customers. And when I mean OUR, I mean ALL of them. Even Bayantel who recently got glowing praises from other consumers is slowly morphing into the usual suspects. it’s OVERSUBSRIPTION is what it is. my blog carries a running campaign abt this. (how i’m willing to pay to jumpstart a class suit whenever i meet like-minded consumers) and just so you know, these telcos’ lock-in clause in their contracts are ANTI-TRUST. what’s NTC doing abt it? jack shit!”

    They sell you promising everything. Have you visited their website? Their ad for the “we roam” is really something, you can access the internet via your laptop even in non hot spot areas, in the beach, resort, etc. In the beginning like a year ago yes it was okay but lately it ridiculously slow and can’t even support our VPN. Did they oversell their capacity?

  • GPS said:

    To Bencard, Ramrod, Pong,
    What do you think of Randy David’s statement last March 2007?
    “If it was right to force (Joseph) Estrada out of Malacañang in 2001 for plundering the public coffers, why is it wrong to oust GMA today extraconstitutionally for an even more grievous offense of stealing the presidential elections?”

    “If it was right for the Catholic bishops to demand the resignation of an incompetent and immoral president and mobilize people to flock to the streets in 1986 and in 2001, why aren’t they demanding today the resignation of a president who has made a mockery of the democratic process?”

    “If it was right for the Armed Forces in 1986 and in 2001 to intervene in the political sphere, why was it wrong in February 2006?”

    “If it was right in 1986 to set aside the Constitution in order to give way to a revolutionary government when such powers are needed to dismantle the structures of authoritarianism, why would it be wrong today to seize the government and set aside its Constitution in order to pave the way for a formation of a truly just and free society?”

  • ramrod said:

    “If it was right in 1986 to set aside the Constitution in order to give way to a revolutionary government when such powers are needed to dismantle the structures of authoritarianism, why would it be wrong today to seize the government and set aside its Constitution in order to pave the way for a formation of a truly just and free society?” – GPS

    Honestly, it would be very difficult to do today. The officer corps is not that united anymore and its easy to get in trouble even hinting of such ideas. There are more “squeelers” now than before. Another thing, I believe most of our soldiers are “tired” of all this already because of past experience. Just look at them, listen to them, you’ll find traces of “learned helplessness” or apathy.

  • ramrod said:

    Join the “Support the Monks’ protest in Burma”Group in FACEBOOK.317,000 members now and growing!

  • ramrod said:

    The telcos’ “LOCK-IN CLAUSE” is holding us ransom for two years, two years of headaches and frustration! Sometimes I want to join the NPAs who are bombing their sites.

  • jaxius said:

    Ramrod,

    There was a time when I had the idea that Col. Jessup being the protagonist instead of the main antagonist of that movie. Truly, something stirs the souls and hearts of men when honor, duty and country are invoked. Good and noble intentions are unassailable until one realizes that the road to hell is paved with them.

    I just sometimes wander how some officers can invoke the Constitution yet thoroughly disregard it. The Senate hearings on the wiretapping controversy has revealed that wiretapping operations are routine despite what Constitution and RA 4200 says. I am not even referring to the political intelligence that the ISAFP has become infamous for the past few years. Even before the issue surfaced, I know for a fact that it is heavily utilized. Name a violation of the right to privacy of communication, the AFP has violated it. Phones, check. Mail, check. Private conversations, check. Surreptitious entry on abodes, check.

    There are battalion commanders who threaten (and some have done so) to bombard villages nearby places where troops are ambushed. And yes, the AFP is behind most of the killings of activists. Junior officers openly admire Gen. Palparan.

    Protect the Constitution, you say?

    The best protection the military can afford the Constitution is staying out of the political arena.

  • TDC said:

    Free bird towards a free Burma
    (By Daw Aung San Suu Kyi)

    My home…
    where I was born and raised
    used to be warm and lovely
    now filled with darkness and horror.

    My family…
    whom I had grown with
    used to be cheerful and lively
    now living with fear and terror.

    My friends…
    whom I shared my life with
    used to be pure and merry
    now living with wounded heart.

    A free bird…
    which is just freed
    used to be caged
    now flying with an olive branch
    for the place it loves.

    A free bird towards a Free Burma.

  • ramrod said:

    Hi tdc,

    We are all Burmese!

  • TDC said:

    ramrod:have you posted on the Wall for the Monks?

  • jax said:

    Ramrod,

    There was a time when I had the idea that Col. Jessup being the protagonist instead of the main antagonist of that movie. Truly, something stirs the souls and hearts of men when honor, duty and country are invoked. Good and noble intentions are unassailable until one realizes that the road to hell is paved with them.

    I just sometimes wander how some officers can invoke the Constitution yet thoroughly disregard it. The Senate hearings on the wiretapping controversy has revealed that wiretapping operations are routine despite what Constitution and RA 4200 says. I am not even referring to the political intelligence that the ISAFP has become infamous for the past few years. Even before the issue surfaced, I know for a fact that it is heavily utilized. Name a violation of the right to privacy of communication, the AFP has violated it. Phones, check. Mail, check. Private conversations, check. Surreptitious entry on abodes, check.

    There are battalion commanders who threaten (and some have done so) to bombard villages nearby places where troops are ambushed. And yes, the AFP is behind most of the killings of activists. Junior officers openly admire Gen. Palparan.

    Protect the Constitution, you say?

    The best protection the military can afford the Constitution is staying out of the political arena.

  • ramrod said:

    tdc,

    I joined already, even put in my real name, how do I post on this wall?

  • TDC said:

    Burma today,Philippines tomorrow!

    We must support the Burmese people in their struggle against a dictatorship!Hindi sila nagiisa!

    I’m sure one day the world will support us too against a looming dictatorship.

    gloria will NOT step down in 2010.Mark my word.She will want to perpetuate the Pidals in power!

  • TDC said:

    Press “write something ” in The WALL

  • jaxius said:

    lost a post. it was waiting moderation last night. now, its gone?

  • cvj said:

    I don’t our forefathers were savages, they had their own religion, they were just trying to protect their territories from foreigners. -Pilipinoparin

    As per Manolo’s recommendation, I just finished reading Mabini’s “The Philippine Revolution” (available online) and he makes a similar point. As to Lapu-lapu, i think that was the first and last time we Filipinos (or our ancestors at least who are non-Muslim) were able to repel foreign invaders unassisted. I’m not sure why he is not a larger figure in the mythology of the Philippine military.

  • cvj said:

    Oops, posted the above before reading Ramrod’s clarification at 8:56am.

  • ramrod said:

    “Lapu-lapu, i think that was the first and last time we Filipinos (or our ancestors at least who are non-Muslim) were able to repel foreign invaders unassisted. I’m not sure why he is not a larger figure in the mythology of the Philippine military.” – cvj

    We have a Camp Lapu-Lapu in Cebu and thats just about it. Maybe because there’s not much written about him, the early historians were probably spaniards and tried as much as they could to belittle or trivialize the humiliating trouncing of their civilized soldiers by this unknown “savage.” Off with their heads!

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    Harry, your personal pursuit of karah is a distraction.

    ramrod, honestly now, do you believe Esperon is true and faithful to the Code of Ethics of the Filipino Soldier?

  • cvj said:

    Ramrod, i’m not sure how much switching to Globe will help. Although in theory, telco deregulation which brought about competition would lead to better service, Albert Hirschmann (in his ‘Exit, Voice & Loyalty’) wrote about a situation where competition leads to poorer service compared to a monopoly.

    He uses the elements ‘exit’ (equivalent to apathy or in your apt words ‘learned helplessness’ and expressed as switching to the other provider) and ‘voice’ (manifested in customer complaints).

    What happens right now is those disatissfied with Globe go to SMART, those disatissfied with SMART go to Globe etc. etc. Net effect of this churn is that the telcos don’t hurt enough to improve their service.

    Contrast that with a situation in which there is only one provider (i.e. a monopoly) and the only alternatives for the consumers is to complain, ‘grin and bear it’ or do without phone service. Hirschmann says that in this scenario where a phone is almost a basic necessity, the consumers will have no choice but to eventually complain with the result that a government (assuming it is responsive to the people), will have to take action.

    Of course Hirschmann it as a given that the government is not populated by the likes of GMA, Abalos, Neri and the like in which the result would be what we are seeing now. But he can be excused because he is not a Filipino.

    Incidentally, you can apply the above dynamic to Philippine Education and the OFW phenomenon.

  • ramrod said:

    Shaman of Malilipot,

    Honestly, (and because of our anonymity) I think Esperon has forgotten this already. Ask him to recite it, I’m pretty sure he cannot anymore.

  • karah said:

    In the most recent speech by GMA at the UN General Assembly, she singled out Myanmar (Burma). I quote:

    “This is the time for Myanmar to return to the path of democracy and to release Daw Aung San Suu Kyi – now – and involve all the parties including the National League for Democracy in the democratization and the constitutional process.” Quite a gutsy statement. (I hope this statement would not be viewed again that it has something to do with the present woes the Palace have).

    My heart goes to the Burmese people. Even the apolitical monks have started to go to the streets to demand better governance from the Military Junta. A round of Sanctions would just aggravate the situation considering there’s widespead poverty, hunger, and chaos. Even if sanctions would be set in place, it would be the people that would suffer, not the Generals in their comfy abodes.

    We can only do as much as supporting the cause and us being morale boosters to the Burmese people. Other than that, we are helpless in a sense that we cannot involve ourselves too deep in the matter because it’s the fight of the Burmese people, not ours.

  • cvj said:

    Okay, I’m switching to Gl*be! – Ramrod

    Ramrod, i responded to the above but it’s under moderation. In the meantime, i reposted my response in my own blog.

  • karah said:

    GPS More than being RIGHT or WRONG, the question is: Can the OPPOSITION who has been very vocal and aggressive in calling for GMA’s resignation GATHER THE NUMBERS for such an endeavor? They have tried several times to call for another EDSA-like People Power but they have always failed miserably. What’s even more puzzling is that even CORY AQUNIO’s calls and her joining the rallyists didn’t quite have an impact “strong” enough for GMA to even consider stepping down. Now, why is this?

    I have several hunches: (a) Is it because those who want GMA out as well (shall we say a portion of the Silent Majority) does not want to sleep with the very Opposition they outsted (Erap) years back? (b) Due to the past experiences, GMA learned to pamper and spoil the AFP and PNP Generals? (c) Is it because the CATHOLIC CHURCH (in hte Philippines) are also at odds among themselves at the demise of the ever Politically Active Cardinal Sin? It’s a fact that Cardinal Rosales does not say much about Philippine Politics.

    All these questions of Randy David are all valid but it’s not the only questions that should be asked and should be answered.

    Each and every EDSA People Power is UNIQUE. Even the situation and circumstances between EDSA 1 and EDSA 2 though the same goal was to oust a President had very different details and ramifications. A lot of people say, HISTRY REPEATS ITSELF. I beg to disagree. A better concept would be: “Parallelism in History do happen.”

  • cvj said:

    karah, i wish we can trade in the Burmese monks for our Filipino clergy. i won’t be surprised if there will be a dramatic collapse (not just the ongoing slow decline) of belief in the Catholic Church in the near future just like what happened in Europe.

  • grd said:

    devils, KSP lang kasi ang pinoy.

  • ramrod said:

    cvj,

    I read your response to “switching to Globe” in your blog, thanks, I’ll probably add a Globe line mobile phone but my fingers are really itching for the “visibility” gadget they’re promoting right now where I can access the internet via laptop outside hot spot areas faster. I keep thinking about your comment earlier re “belonging to the vendor side” and I’m more careful now before spending for another high tech gadget that turns out to be a lemon afterwards.

  • karah said:

    cvj Was born and raised as a Catholic. It is true that a number of the Clergy from the RCC are committing blunder after blunder – we can’t deny that. My faith though would not depended solely on the “priests” so to speak but on my religious and spiritual convictions. I have deep respect for Buddhism and the Monks but if you ask me now, I’d rather remain a Catholic and only compelling reasons might let me reconsider this assertion of mine.

  • ramrod said:

    cvj,

    I read your response to “switching to Glxbe” in your blog, thanks, I’ll probably add a Globe line mobile phone but my fingers are really itching for the “visibility” gadget they’re promoting right now where I can access the internet via laptop outside hot spot areas faster. I keep thinking about your comment earlier re “belonging to the vendor side” and I’m more careful now before spending for another high tech gadget that turns out to be a lemon afterwards.

  • leah said:

    can you tell ANC and other ABS-CBN channels to start using Burma instead of Myanmar. BBC has been doing this for a while.

  • ramrod said:

    karah,

    Its not that nobody tried. Its just that you don’t know who you can trust nowadays anymore, as I said t
    “too many squeelers!” Before (when you were 5 years old), its possible to go from room to room at night and pass on the messages, flyers, etc. about the movement. They can talk in the grotto, in the hidden nooks and crannies, and nothing gets out. If you notice there are officers getting caught passing out these messages. I don’t assume to know the motive of all these “squeelers” but there was a time when squeeling was punishable by death. There was a time when you kept quiet and nursed your busted toe or broken rib in silence bacause of “what you see, what you hear, leave it here.” Now I hear they can even yell “hazing!”

  • karah said:

    Ram I’m not from Cebu but I know some of the Garcia’s (the present Governor), and one of them is a good friend of mine. Been to Cebu a good number of times.

    Quite recently, there’s a Plan to merge CENTCOM (Central Command) which is within Cebu City, one of the Unified Commands of AFP and the AirForce Base in Mactan somewhere in Mactan as well.

    There’s not much Security Problem in Cebu, anyways. Except for very few insurgents in the West/Northwest. As far as I know, Cebu is one of the safest Cities to live in the Philippines. Plus the fact that within CEBU CITY, there’s only ONE EXIT in the NORTH, and ONE EXIT in the SOUTH. It’s hard to do kidnapping and those stuff.

  • cvj said:

    Karah, i understand that one of the reasons for remaining within a given religion is because they were born into it. i also have remained a Catholic despite the contradictions and primarily because of my Mom’s example. i’ve also been hardwired to believe in God so i cannot not believe even if i wanted to.

    However i am not talking individual cases. there will be others who’s faith and disposition is such that the contradictions they see will overcome their belief in the Catholic Church. I am basing my forecast on what you refer to as the numerous ‘blunders’ committed by the clergy and RC. This all the more highlights the contradictions and will accelerate the process of collapse.

    This collapse has already happened in Europe. For those with a need to believe in something, they will just channel this belief to other religions and/or cults (within or outside Christianity), other ideologies (nationalism with or without fascism).

  • karah said:

    Ram It’s because nowadays, SQUEALERS within the Military is REWARDED heftily. All this time, you didn’t notice that most of the Cabinet of GMA are former Generals from the AFP and the PNP? These Generals still have some following in their formers Division and/or National Support Office.

    Gone were the days of “see, hear, and say no evil.” Now, it’s “squeal” when you’re not given any piece of the pie.

  • grd said:

    just because cardinal rosales doesn’t want to get involve with politics and go out on the streets, the catholic church is on the decline now (says who?). nothing comparable between the situation in the phils (a democratic state) and that of burma (controlled by a military junta where the opposition is being locked-up). such a world of difference. even internet in burma is banned.

  • cvj said:

    grd, in a way you’re right that the situation in Burma and the Philippines are not comparable but your standards for comparability are not what i used. My standard for comparison is the reaction of the monks and clergy to an illegitimate and oppressive government. The Burmese monks are currently risking their lives while the Philippine clergy (especially Cardinal Rosales) has largely sold out.

  • GPS said:

    I guess it all boils down to a collective appraisal of what the tipping point is, when the majority including the clergy decide once and for all “enough is enough”.The Burmese monks and Philippine clergy as a whole sees things differently but it does not mean that both are bereft of a high standard of morality and love of country.

  • cvj said:

    ramrod, feel free to speak up against high-tech gadgets. i belong to the services side of the business and in terms of gadgets i’m agnostic and i make it a point to use technology that is one or two generations older (i.e. mature). of course sometimes, as they say, it’s better manual.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    i once attended a lecture by a historian from mindanao and he pointed out that one nuance we still have to resolve, is that the nobility of the time (lapu lapu was one) were borneans, that one way to look at it, is that they were foreign leaders on our shores; or the other way is the way the malaysians view the sultan of sulu as part of the malaysian nobility; personally, one idea i’ve been exploring (gradually, for lack of time) is that what we consider the philippines was not what even the spaniards would have considered the philippines, what the americans intended to be the philippines, etc. or even what our first republic was trying to establish as the philippines. it’s a very interesting thing to explore but requires a lot of fussing around with maps, and consulting committee reports, particularly in the 1935 constitutional convention, etc. even the philippines that became independent in 1946 is not the philippines of today: only after independence in 46 did a young diplomat named diosdado macapagal gain the distinction of raising the philippine flag in the turtle islands, for example, expanding our territory marginally.

  • ramrod said:

    crv,

    Its not that the clergy has actually sold out. After all thats happened (EDSA 1 and 2), even the involvement of its members in the radical left, the catholic church is more reserved in their responses to this situation, there are also members of the church who opt to assume a more biblical position, after all, it is clearly defined in the good book – give to Ceasar what is for Ceasar. Nowhere is the delineation between church and state taught more strictly than in the born again movements where the teachings are based directly from the bible especially if you use NIV and not from whatever comes out of the priests’ mouths.

    In the Philippines, there are churches that are growing phenomenally fast and these are very radical in their intrepretation of the bible. When the minister is speaking, they take down notes and check the verse in their own bibles. They do not blindly follow what the minister or priest is saying. These churches are particularly attractive to the growing middle class as the lower class cannot relate to what might look to them as “elite” but eventually this was overcome by forming clusters to cater to this uniqueness, dialect and all. Yes, I agree that there may come a time when traditional churches will decline because the otherwise docile “yes father” flock will become more educated and will look for more meaningful ways of worshipping other than the “formula” prayers – Our Father, etc. and there is this deep need to be rebuked truthfully in love. Some of the flock may even turn to other more “scientific” form of worship. But there are members of the catholic church though who are adjusting to this new breed of christians’ need. Take a look at Bo Sanchez, and several others (I forgot) where their way of communicating with the flock mirrors that of the born again ministers, does this mean the catholic church is aware of the unrelatability of tradition and is adjusting to a more sophisticated flock?

  • karah said:

    cvj In my lifetime (which I’m only 26), I have searched and explored the Catholic Religion – studying Philosophy, Theology and Spirituality. And I can base my own convictions only in my experience that more than being born a Catholic, I believe in the traditions, the bible, and the magisterium of the RCC. Yes, good example counts a lot but when we grow older, it’s really up to us on what to choose.

    I don’t think that 2000 years of History by the Catholic Church would just be destroyed by crisis here and there. Actually, the RCC faced bigger ones from the time it was established. There was even a time in Rome that just a mention, just a suspicion that you’re the Christian (Catholic, you’ll be burned alive. Remember, Nero and how he made Christians human torches in the Colosseum.

    There’s a downtrend, sure, but there are Catholic Churches that might have been dormant yet Catholic Churches in Africa and Catholic Churches in South America are very vibrant. The collapse of Catholicism in Europe cannot be attributed alone to all these scandals, rather, it’s due to Atheism. How this came to be needs in-depth study of Religious History in Europe.

    A person should not stay in a particular religion just because he/she was born into it or he/she was forced into it. A person should stay with his/her Religion/Beliefs because of his/her convictions and principles. This is the line that draws the HAPHAZARD BELIEVERS from the TRUE BELIEVERS.

  • grd said:

    cjv, i’m not really sold out to your notion that the phil clergy has largely sold out (is that how you portray the clergies and other filipinos, easily bought if their stand is different from yours?) again, just because according to your standards, our clergies are not risking their lives against this “illegitimate and oppressive govt”. don’t you think you’re giving our clergies too much responsibilities instead of pointing the blame on our legislators who have the power to remove this “illegitimate” govt? i would prefer a church that will not dip its hands on politics. but you know what? the scenario in our country will dramatically change after 2010. you will witness again something explosive to happen (that i guarantee) that will unite the people. that is, if gloria decides to stay (which i really doubt). now just compare 6 years of gloria’s “illegitimate” reign against the many years of burmese sufferings at the hands of an oppressive regime before the monks did their act. you can see the difference and what filipinos are capable of.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    re: grd

    if cardinal rosales yelled at the president she should resign, then piously tells the people let’s move on, i think he can be taken to task vs. another bishop who might say, consistently, forget politics, period and another bishop who consistently has something strong to say vs. say gambling and abductions.

    institutionally, well, there’s always a silver lining and recently when i was invited to give a brief analysis to a group of foreign businessmen, i simply pointed out a mature secular democracy doesn’t rely on the clergy, so you could see it as the country finally taking a step forward toward being a secular democracy.

    just as, in feb. 06, i understand that among our officer corps, a common current among even those incensed over corruption in the military was, that the military has no business governing, it’s not qualified to do so, that the intervention in edsa dos opened up more problems than it solved -in which case, maybe that’s another step forward.

    for those upset with the president as i am, it also means accepting as i’ve pointed out elsewhere that while some of us may have more hard line positions than others, you never give up trying to nudge the public forward but at a certain point, also, take stock and accept there is wisdom in what the public wants and is prepared to do.

    the most ferocious backlash the government faced was when it seriously proposed cancelling the may 2007 elections and abolishing presidential elections. so, those are the parameters: people don’t want a coup; they insist on elections; they want to vote for the head of state and government; and also, i do think the rules of people power i identified early on held true: those who benefited from it, cannot deny it to anyone else (the backlash against gov’t clamping down on protests); those who were its targets, cannot claim it for themselves (the manner the estrada, the national democrats, and marcoses, when they intervened, helped people power fizzle out), and that people power must be peaceful and be led by its leaders from the front and not the rear. and so on down the line, so what i told the foreigners was, parameters have been laid out; whenever anyone tries to cross the line, the backlash is equal (versus the admin and versus the opposition), that people have decided to remain open-minded to purely constitutional options like impeachment, but it’s not their fault if the processes won’t move forward.

    or maybe i’m being too much of an optimist.

  • ramrod said:

    mlq3,

    I’m particularly interested in our “true history” not these watered down textbooks that are more like reading material for beginning readers. Historians seemed to favor a different account sometimes, for instance the spanish came in and brought christianity, bringing salvation to “savages” who would have otherwise gone to hell because they were not baptized. Or the Americans, because of the Tomasites brought education, etc. Little is discussed about the massacres and the real intentions of these colonizers.

  • grd said:

    one more thing cvj, although you’re a non practicing christian, don’t you know that our clergies are involved in a lot of charity works? which do you prefer they march on the streets or tend to their destitutes and needy flocks?

  • karah said:

    Historical variables do count a lot in trying to really comprehend WHAT and HOW things are before and WHAT and HOW things in the “here and now.” The local inhabitants of the Philippines were really the Aetas (Negritos). When Malay Datu’s came – their first settlement was in Antique Province, it was the start of the spread of the Malay blood throughout the Archipelago. I have even witnessed the BINIRAYAN FESTIVAL, it’s the re-enactment when DATU PUTI (one of the Bornean Datus) bought some land from the Aeta Chieftain Marikudo with a GOLDREN SADOK (salakot or head gear). Datu Sumakwel and the other Datus went to journey into other territories and the rest is history. We cannot consider the settlement of the Bornean Datus as OCCUPATION simply because the locals welcomed them with open arms.

    There are a lot of considerations in trying to understand Philippine History and Culture (you have look into Geography, History, Anthropology/Sociology, Politics, Economics, and so on and so forth). At the time of the First Republic, what was considered sa “THE PHILIPPINES THEN” up to now. As MLQ3 has mentioned, we have to look into the different historical evidences. During the time of the Spaniards, did Philippine Territory already had 7,107 islands. How many islands were considered the Philippine Archipelago at the time of the Americans, the short occupation of the Japanese and eventually the Philippine Independence up to the time the father of GMA raised a flag in Turtle Islands in the South.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    ramrod, i don’t know if there’s a “true history”. only interpretations which support their interpretations with data you can agree with or disagree with. or surveying the landscape. people can be as fanatical about interpretations as religious zealots are about church dogma. there’s even the debate if history is a science or literature.

    but each interpretation builds on past interpretations, the idea is to keep moving forward rather than become fossilized in your thinking. anyway, that’s my view.

    we have a lot of top-down history, too little bottom-up history, and even less synthesizing of the two, pointing out where the clashes in interpretation should lead others to clarify things further.

    personally, the book i recommend to people as their basic introduction is patricio abinales’ “state and society in the philippines,” as it takes us from prehispanic times to edsa dos. i understand al mccoy has long been due to publish a history of the philippines, which would be remarkable. one historian, glenn may, was basically run out of town by angry filipino historians because he dared to ask if what we think we know about bonifacio is really true.

  • cvj said:

    manolo, since you are teaching (at Letran?), why don’t you assign some of your research projects on history (e.g. philippine territory during Spanish times) to your students? for bonus points?

    ramrod, no religion is as docile as Buddhism but i guess the monks reached a tipping point. Unlike the idealistic days of 1986 (and 2001), i think the Catholic Church went beyond the tipping point and got coopted by the system. Fortunately (or unfortunately), the Bible and Church doctrine has enough leeway to rationalize all sorts of positions.

    karah, if you were born a muslim, i bet (but of course cannot prove) that you would have done the same (but this time with the Koran and Islamic studies).

    In terms of sophistication, i think the Roman Catholic Church is the most sophisticated in that it takes account of both tradition and the bible. it adjusted itself to scientific discoveries like evolution. those who take the bible literally are a threat to modernity (to the extent that its practitioners cannot compartmentalize their lives).

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    cvj, because this sem i was teaching opinion/editorial writing and next sem, i’ll be teaching proofreading and copyediting. it would be a stretch. let me earn my own academic spurs first and then i can unleash teams of students on study projects.

  • ramrod said:

    “Quite recently, there’s a Plan to merge CENTCOM (Central Command) which is within Cebu City, one of the Unified Commands of AFP and the AirForce Base in Mactan somewhere in Mactan as well.” – karah

    The air force base is called “Mactan Air Base,” I used to go there a lot because at the time I could get a free though not very comfortable flight in the C130 to Manila, even Mindanao. And yes, its quite a safe place also, though lately there is a growing Korean population. In my childhood, we come home after school and take our bikes to any direction and we could be in a beach already (for free) in 30 mins or so. Now, everywhere you go are resorts, you have to pay. My favorite by the way everytime I go there to meet my clients if Mactan Shangrila, its a pocket paradise.

  • karah said:

    cvj I don’t think it relevant anymore to speculate on that. I was born a Catholic and that’s my reality. But in the business of LIFE and GROWING UP, there are no guarantees you know. Even sons/daughers of Catholics born into really Conservative and Fundamental Families does not guarantee that that person would follow the family stand.

    One of the reasons the Catholic Church is still vibrant (in some continents) is that it EVOLVED, it GREW, and it listened to what they call “THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES.” The TRIPOD of the Catholic Faith is (a) THE BIBLE; (b) THE SACRED TRADITIONS; (c) THE MAGISTERIUM. Just imagine the sturdiness and stability of a THREE CORNERED CHAIR compared to only one or two (just an analogy).

  • grd said:

    mlq3, re: rosales. has it been reported that rosales has dipped his hands into politics in the past? i think he’s just being consistent with his beliefs and principles maybe. people should just respect that. i myself have commented in the past that if sin is still around, maybe gloria ouster is a forgone conlusion now. but i don’t blame resales for that. i just say gloria is very lucky. and smarter too (than her detractors). i still hate her though for that “hello garci” scandal. it’s a betrayal of public’s trust. but i put the blame on our congressmen for not doing their job.

    agree with you about that may 2007 backlash and just like what i wrote above, if there will be no elections in 2010 expect another backlash from the people.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    grd, well, the public issue where the cardinal’s been consistent is the environment, and so, well, good for him on that.

    re: 2010 and everyone knows my views on this, an interesting take by tony abaya’s here:

    http://acabaya.blogspot.com/2007/10/dominatrix.html

  • ramrod said:

    “ramrod, no religion is as docile as Buddhism but i guess the monks reached a tipping point.” – cvj

    I agree. I would have been very disappointed if they didn’t. No one, even the most pious can ignore the suffering of another for long. I’m willing to bet even GMA’s life that even the Trappist monks will come rushing out of their monasteries if they hear the wailings of suffering, tortured, maimed, raped, and hungry people over their walls.

  • grd said:

    manolo,

    re: lapu-lapu. has it got to do with religion why not much is written about him?

  • karah said:

    Ram You’re one of the beneficiaries of these so-called “Mercy Flights.” Was able to ride one of those C-130 . Been inside the CENTCOM in Lahug , pretty much to most of the tourist destinations in Cebu + more. I even toured Cebu from Daan-Bantayan to Santander. :D

    So I heard there are a lot of Koreans going to Cebu – mainly to English and some “rejects or shall we say stubborn students in Korea” are exiled in the Philippines. The growing Korean community also became an opportunity for Koreans to put up their own Business for the Koreans and for the Locals. There are reports too of some Abusive Koreans but I hope they realize that they are in a foreign land and start behaving.

    Used to go to Plantation Bay, Tambuli, and Maribago Blue Water. Shangri-La is a nice place as well as well as its IMPORTED WHITE SAND. Mactan Island is rocky and the beach has a lot of corals (that’s why there’s the famour Mactan Rock). Even been to Cordova, there’s a nice resort there. Quiet and cozy resort but quite far from Lapu-Laput City itself. I miss SUTUKIL in Punta Engano.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    grd, i don’t think so, just a lack of primary sources and perhaps also, not enough information putting leaders like him in the context of what was going on in the region at the time.

  • grd said:

    manolo,

    thanks. this push for a parliamentary form of govt, you think it has a chance before 2010? i just can’t imagine how they are going to do it without another backlash.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    grd, some time ago i boiled down palace approach as brinkmanship and the scorched earth policy.

  • karah said:

    Be right back. It’s so hard to be on your own. I’ll just put my clothes in the washer. Do some cooking and leave if for a while whilst blogging.

  • grd said:

    ok manolo. that’s interesting to watch. let’s see then how these palace spinmeisters can ram through the house another initiative without getting the ire of the people.

  • cvj said:

    cvj I don’t think it relevant anymore to speculate on that. I was born a Catholic and that’s my reality. – karah

    karah, i think you have a very good grasp of what reality really is.

    grd, the rank and file clergy may not have sold out (like some of their Superiors), but the line of reasoning which uses vocational or community based service (including charity works) as an excuse for apathy on national matters is a cop-out on their part.

    To blame our legislators (or other politicians) alone ignores the role of the Public Sphere in disciplining or holding accountable the agents of the State.

  • ramrod said:

    “ramrod, feel free to speak up against high-tech gadgets. i belong to the services side of the business and in terms of gadgets i’m agnostic and i make it a point to use technology that is one or two generations older (i.e. mature). of course sometimes, as they say, it’s better manual.” – cvj

    Its true. I feel like I’m duped everytime I lock my sights on a new toy. Take for example the Sony Erickson P910i, there was a lot of hype before it hit the market but when it finally did pfffft, “thats it?” I couldn’t even use it for our company “push mail.” I complained to Smart and they pointed me to the SE service center, when i went there I was told that its a network issue, that they were not ready to support push mail, but I see my colleagues from Europe and Singapore access their pushmail when they’re here in the Philippines (of course their using Nokia communicators or Dopod). Another thing, I had this idea that the work can be done here even without putting up an office and staff and work as an extension of Singapore office, so I had this “virtual office” I have a business address in Makati where people can call and a call center will answer say my company’s name and forward the call to me wherever I am as if I’m just in the other room. Along with this, I used the “we roam” so I can be anywhere in the Philippines and still have access to the office intranet. You know how it is, you can acess all data you need through the website (with VPN of course) so there’s no need to bring tons of paper and reference materials. In my mind, I really believed that the work done before by two companies can be handled by one person provided there is the “equalizer” – technology. What I failed to input in the equation was that the Philippines may not be that prepared for this kind of set-up and as you said some things are better done manually, but it look so good in the brochures…

  • tonio said:

    deny –> distort –> deflect –> distract –> defuse.

    all these Ds. that’s what everything has been to me so far.

  • cvj said:

    Ramrod, i think there’s a place for leading edge users of technology like you and slackers like me. In this sense, you’re like the Buddhist monks who take the lead and pay the price (in this case of the S*ny Ericks*n P91Oi) as a result. I’m like the rest of the population who benefit by getting more mature versions of these devices at a lower price.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    ramrod, your story re: your virtual office woes, reminds me of a funny story a friend from the dfa assured me was true.

    some years back, a new dfa sec. was appointed with grand ideas of modernizing the entire department. computerize everything! then one usec. submits a requisition for 60 typewriters. the dfa sec. is furious. modernize! modernize! the usec. starts laughing. why are you laughing there? modernize! modernize! the usec. kept laughing.

    finally, the sec. starts screaming, give me one good reason why i shouldn’t fire you for this stupid requisition?

    “brownouts, mr. secretary.”

    the dfa sec. grabbed the requisition order and signed it.

  • ramrod said:

    “The best protection the military can afford the Constitution is staying out of the political arena.”-Jaxius

    I couldn’t agree with more. I was referring to why the soldiers did not open fire on civilians and this being not a derelection of duty if you look at the soldier’s code of conduct. The military in politics is a double edged sword, it can be to the advantage of the real patriots or used to the advantage of scrupulous people but how do we discern who is who?

  • ramrod said:

    tonio :
    deny –> distort –> deflect –> distract –> defuse.

    all these Ds. that’s what everything has been to me so far.

    Welcome to Psywar 101

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Peregrine Worsthorne, who used to write for The Times UK, writes for The First Post UK:

    “In theory, China, Burma’s neighbour, could intervene. But Burma is now a burden for the great Asian nations, India and China, to shoulder even that – for the same kind of reasons that have wrecked American intervention in Iraq – might make matters more bloody.

    “The truth is that Burma is now a burden for the great Asian nations, India and China, to shoulder, and the less the ex-colonial power has to say about it the better. The same goes for the United States. Western medicines which have failed so tragically in the Middle East are no more likely to serve any useful purpose in South East Asia.

    “Asia for the Asians. It is their turn to take charge. In the multi-polar 21st century, that is how the cookie has to crumble.

    “Eventually our solutions, on their merits, may prevail. It is right to hope so. But equally certainly, Western force-feeding will delay, rather than promote, that outcome.”

    I agree.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Also agree entirely with Jaxius and more particularly with Bencard’s proposition here:

    “soldiers are soldiers… they are to defend the constitution and the constitutional government and its instrumentalities, even against the people who would try to overthrow them.”

    Soldiers, officers and at whatever level must know that while they are expected to obey orders superiors blindly, they are bound by military laws and soldiers’ traditions to refuse to follow illegal orders, i.e., to fire on unarmed civilians, whatever the cost on their career, on their lives.

    It would take a great deal of moral courage to defy illegal orders but soldiering is not only all about physical courage – a soldier and an officer must possess both physical and moral courage. Sadly, most of our current crop of officers do not possess moral courage.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    And Esperon, a political appointee – (chief of staff position is a political appointment), doesn’t possess the ultimate courage, moral courage, to say wrong is wrong no matter who says or does it.

  • cvj said:

    MBW, but isn’t Worthstone using ‘Western Medicines’ as a weasel word? I mean, what’s so Western about Buddhist monks marching against an oppressive government? His comparison with the Middle East (which i suppose refers to Iraq) is not applicable in the sense that (1) to my knowledge, there is no planned invasion of Burma and (2) the outrage was not the result of manufactured pretexes (e.g. WMD, Saddam-AQ conspiracy etc.).

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    I think by Western medicine, he wants to pre-empt a British, as Burma’s former colonial master, military jump into Burma using the SAS.

    Don’t believe he meant the Buddhist monks.

    Don’t get me wrong – I’ve never been and admirer of Worthorne’s (his ultra conservative, more ultra impossible) rhetorics but this time I agree with him – Britain or NATO (unless UN approved) should not step in in case things get worse on the military front internally, Burma is an Asian problem in that respect.

  • cvj said:

    MBW, i just read the entire column, i think your understanding of what he referred to as ‘Western Medicine’ (i.e. as the Brits ‘doing something’) is correct.

  • ramrod said:

    “Eventually our solutions, on their merits, may prevail. It is right to hope so. But equally certainly, Western force-feeding will delay, rather than promote, that outcome.”

    Western military intervention especially US will quickly dispense with the ruling dictator, however, what happens after? The Burmese people are capable ot charting the course of their destiny as a people and as a country whether bloody or not, at least they will able to say “we did the Burmese way!”

    Free Burma!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    If at all there should be external internal military intervention, it should come from the Asian countries. However, I advise against overt military intervention by anybody. It should be covert if at all that’s what is required.

    An overt military intervention from the outside is not a guarantee that the Burmese will be able to chart their own course and as Ramrod says, what next?

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    One thing to consider, Burma has 400,000 or more troops in active service. A fraction of them can effectively get rid of their junta and the latter’s loyalists.

  • cvj said:

    If at all there should be external internal military intervention, it should come from the Asian countries. – MBW

    I’m reminded of Vietnam’s invasion of Cambodia which put an end to Pol Pot’s Killing fields. Twenty-five years later, Americans tried to follow that model in Iraq but failed miserable.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    As we speak, I’m pretty certain that Aung Sii Kyu has already been approached by some officers of the Burma military regarding the possibility. Dr Aung is no doubt worried about an eventual bloodshed.

  • cvj said:

    sorry, i meant miserably.

  • ramrod said:

    “It would take a great deal of moral courage to defy illegal orders but soldiering is not only all about physical courage – a soldier and an officer must possess both physical and moral courage.” -MBW

    There is an impasse really, the soldiers “code of conduct” is not in the “articles of war” and I think there is no mention of the same in the constitution. If there was, Querubin and others could have been justified in their “withdrawal of support.”

    “1. I am a Filipino Soldier . FIRST and FOREMOST I will support and defend the constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.”

    “3. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will obey the law,
    legal orders and decrees of my lawful superiors at all times.”

    This does not mean blind obedience. But blind obedience is in fact being demanded of soldiers who question the origin of the chain of command — the commander-in chief — as being in clear and present violation of the constitution which they have sworn to support and defend.

    Under the present circumstance, a declaration of ‘withdrawal of support’ to the commander-in-chief by soldiers breaking out of he chain of command is not the appropriate declaration. The declaration should simply be, “I hereby honor my pledge to support and to defend the constitution.”

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    right! So do you think a Western military intervention, particularly from the US or Britain is the right solution? I don’t think so.

    this is perhaps the moment required for Asean nations to be more forceful, their moment of glory, in only morally. ASEAN leaders should get in there and toughen their stance against the Burmese junta. Of course, military intervention is not always a solution, as we’ve seen in Iraq.

    Let this be a test of Asean resolve!

    Let’s see the moral backbone of Asian leaders today!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    But I think, this passage here is excellent: ““3. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will obey the law, legal orders and decrees of my lawful superiors at all times.” ”

    Of course, no. 1 sums it up!

    In British articles of War, similar to no. 3, “I will obey the law, legal orders, etc.,” exists.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    Besides I wouldn’t want a military jump into Burma under Brown! Beurk, beurk, beurk! He will mess up things just like Blair!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    There are Vietnamese mercenaries in the world today, maybe Aseans should hire them to get in there and do away with the burmese Junta (heheheh!)

  • cvj said:

    MBW, Western (or Asian) military intervention did not cross my mind, but setting up refugee camps in India, China and Thailand and demanding safe passage for the monks (and other protesters) who want to leave is something that the surrounding countries (China, India, Thailand and Laos) can and must do.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    There is also a well known highly paid Filipino mercenary who used to operate in Africa (he was once of those caught by French secret service in the early 70s but later released to the Americans).

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    I don’t know if their leaving en masse, ie monks or other military would be defectors crossing into refugee camps (although these should be set up now in preparation for such an eventuality by UN or ngos) is the right answer. They should “fight” it out within Burma after all Burma is vast enough. Dr Aung needs help from within!

  • ramrod said:

    I think some elements of the Burmese military are now on on the move albeit clandestinely. There was a defection already, a Major in the Army at that. Suppression and cruelty to a fellow human being is not a “natural” act and will most certainly put so much stress on these men that eventually they will have to say “enough!” Granted of course that there are not many incentives to this “unnatural act.”
    The next news I would like to hear is that some junior officers plotted to remove the junta, I mean “already” removed the junta, (heaven forbid that they suffer the fate of Hitler’s officers who were nipped in the bud).
    And with the removal, the installing of the rightful president. The problem with coups is that there is the temptation for the military to stay in power…

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Right! “The problem with coups is that there is the temptation for the military to stay in power…”

    That’s why the monks should stay in, they are greatly respected, Dr Aung needs them in case a coup by junior officers gains ground.

  • ramrod said:

    “There is also a well known highly paid Filipino mercenary who used to operate in Africa (he was once of those caught by French secret service in the early 70s but later released to the Americans).”

    I was thinking more along the lines of advisers. You know, teaching the people the rudiments of people power, how all the elements must come together, timing, and of course calculation of impact.

  • karah said:

    I think it’s evident that the only way to resolve the BURMA DILEMMA is “external intervention.” In this case, the ASEAN, as an organization could step up and prove its mettle (if it has any, that is). Burma (Myanmar) being a member of the ASEAN is already a political advantage for other ASEAN nations to convince the present Military Junta to step down and pass power to a democratic Government. It might not be easy but “expelling” Burma from ASEAN would cause more harm than good.

    We all know that the UN, especially the UN Security Council is quite INUTILE in solving International Issues (may it be among fighting nations or domestic disputes). The UN is like a TIGER without TEETH and CLAWS.

    By any estimation, the problem of BURMA should be resolved by the Burmese people but if other nations could help (except militarily) then why not. Frustrations comes in sometimes due to helplessness but Burma as a nation, they have their own journey to tread on. What we can do individually is to support ADVOCACIES, put pressure through popular dissatisfaction of the present Military Junta. Other than that, we can do only as much.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Re: “By any estimation, the problem of BURMA should be resolved by the Burmese people but if other nations could help (except militarily) then why not. ”

    Except for overt military intervention, I think the whole world is doing that already through sanctions, intel feed, advisory level to the clandestine forces network, etc.

    And right, ASEAN must prove its mettle today. This is the ultimate test of the Asian union’s resolve and in line with the union’s political doctrine of democracy.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    Btw, thie Fil mercenary I was talking about became an American defence industry salesman to Pinas during Cory’s FVR’s terms.

  • karah said:

    One thing we have to take into consideration is that, does this “GROUP OF MILITARY OFFICERS” who have plans to oust the JUNTA, have the capability and the numbers? I mean, it might be a bloody one and the only way the REBEL-SOLDIERS would succeed would be (a) overwhelm the military junta militarily; (b) have external support from another country military; (c) a peaceful outster? (much like edsa 1). But by the looks of it, the soldiers that support the junta are willing to kill even the Buddhist Monks. (another variable to consider).

    I wonder if the JUNTA gives money or whatever to the Senior and Junior Officers for the junta to stay in power. This is one aspect that should be looked into. Yes, a COUP PLOT might just be another JUNTA. Which is damning. These are the dangers. Remember some Governments in South America, it’s a Military Junta then another Military Junta, and so on and so forth.

  • ramrod said:

    “Btw, thie Fil mercenary I was talking about became an American defence industry salesman to Pinas during Cory’s FVR’s terms.” – mbw

    Isn’t that FVR’s job nowadays?

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Re: “I wonder if the JUNTA gives money or whatever to the Senior and Junior Officers for the junta to stay in power.”

    From my own readings, ordinary members of the military have very high standards of living as opposed to the ordinary Burmese citizen. They have privileges that allow members of their families to enter into business, go to schools, other great material perks, i.e., TV or cell phones even.

    Obviously, the more senior, colonel and higher, must have the “highest standard of living”.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    If you mean by FVR’s job today is in referrence to Carlyle? I don’t think he’s selling anymore. He’s been sacked or to be more politically correct, he’s been asked to resign from the Carlyle board of advisors.

  • ramrod said:

    mbw

    He wasn’t able to sell anything? How do we apply to this company? I think this is better than selling paper, ala Nicholas Cage in a movie. Unfortunately I forgot the title.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Re: I mean, it might be a bloody one and the only way the REBEL-SOLDIERS would succeed would be (a) overwhelm the military junta militarily;

    I am confident that Western secret services are working already on officers clandestinely; we will never know to what extent until after or when the junta is toppled (

    b) have external support from another country military;

    Wont be surprised if this has already been considered even if only covertly

    (c) a peaceful outster? (much like edsa 1).

    I believe that’s what Dr Aung is aiming for. Burma has a violent history of transition of power and I think she is right to be cautious. A faction of the military that would rebel could be easily annihilated and bloody reprisals could happen.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Hazhahahahah! “He wasn’t able to sell anything? How do we apply to this company? I think this is better than selling paper, ala Nicholas Cage in a movie.”

    Don’t know the movie at all but sure, why not? I can give you an address. Best thing is to get in touch with British or French Embassy DA. They will tell you. (Seriously!) Hahahahaha.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Geez, Mlq3′s minesweeper is at it again. I’m on moderation!

    Will see if this get’s through:

    Re: “I wonder if the JUNTA gives money or whatever to the Senior and Junior Officers for the junta to stay in power.”

    From my own readings, ordinary members of the military have very high standards of living as opposed to the ordinary Burmese citizen. They have privileges that allow members of their families to enter into business, go to schools, other great material perks, i.e., TV or cell phones even.

    Obviously, the more senior, colonel and higher, must have the “highest standard of living”.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    OK, OK, … Mlq3’s minesweeper is at it again. I’m on moderation!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Karah,

    “I wonder if the JUNTA gives money or whatever to the Senior and Junior Officers for the junta to stay in power.”

    From my own readings, ordinary members of the military have very high standards of living as opposed to the ordinary Burmese citizen. They have privileges that allow members of their families to enter into business, go to schools, other great material perks, i.e., TV or cell phones even.

    Obviously, the more senior, colonel and higher, must have the “highest standard of living”.

  • karah said:

    MBW Quite frankly, I do not approve of ECONOMIC SANCTIONS. When economic sanctions are put in place, it’s the people that suffers all the more and not the sitting pretty Generals of the Junta. On the military side, what are the countries that help the “underground rebel-soldiers” of Burma? I think that CHINA has a big interest in some of the Natural Resources of Burma because of it’s hunger for Raw Materials in Manufacturing.

    Yes, the ASEAN are even pushing for an EU-like Community within the next 10-15 years. They want “regional integration” to happen. This is very doable among the more stable and peaceful Member-countries. How about those Member-countries that still has some problems like Burma, Cambodia, Laos, and some parts of Indonesia. This is one of those times that a question would be asked: “Does ASEAN have what it takes to discipline its own Members.”

  • GPS said:

    One of the problems of Burma is that it has no oil reserves. No superpower will spend billions of dollar just to overtly help Burma for free and just listen to Aung Suu Kyi tell them “Thank you for helping us be free again”. There must be a return of investment as in the case of Iraq, even if the Americans are losing the war, they are gaining the oil. “Underneath the veneer of politics is the interest of business”.The least these superpowers can do is to help covertly and economically, I hope.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Karah,

    Dr Aung herself asked for economic sanctions because the Burmese junta are the first to take advantage of the economic boom in Burma.

    Example: there are various types of economic sanctions, they could come with freezing invetments in gaz explorations, western trading in mineral extracts will be frozen, etc.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    GPZ,

    Burma land is used for refinery and gaz transmition to the many of surrounding countries, to that effect, Burma’s geographical location is crucial!

  • ramrod said:

    It should be a peaceful ouster like EDSA 1. People, monks, and livestock boldly approaching the junta soldiers (but not agressively) bring flowers, etc., no weapons. The sympathetic soldiers’ task is to persuade other soldiers to spare the people – no agression, so that when the time comes, they will think twice of shooting, or maybe to position themselves at the forefront and when the order to shoot is given, they let everybody else see hesitation, and put down their weapons, embrace the people (lucky if the ones in front are pretty young women, otherwise contend with toothless monk), and then turn around towards the junta’s position and everybody join in singing “why can’t we be friends, why can’t we be friends,” or something like “magkaisa” in Burmese.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Mlq3′s minesweeper isn’t through with an earlier comment/reply to Karah’s “I wonder if the JUNTA gives money or whatever to the Senior and Junior Officers for the junta to stay in power.”

    Let’s see if this goes through.

    From my own readings, ordinary members of the military have very high standards of living as opposed to the ordinary Burmese citizen. They have privileges that allow members of their families to enter into business, go to schools, other great material perks, i.e., TV or cell phones even.

    Obviously, the more senior, colonel and higher, must have the “highest standard of living”.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Agree, Ramrod, agree entirely!

    “the ones in front are pretty young women, otherwise contend with toothless monk),”

    Hahahah!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Mlq3’s minesweeper isn’t through with an earlier comment/reply to Karah’s “I wonder if the JUNTA gives money or whatever to the Senior and Junior Officers for the junta to stay in power.”

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Re: How about those Member-countries that still has some problems like Burma, Cambodia, Laos, and some parts of Indonesia. This is one of those times that a question would be asked: “Does ASEAN have what it takes to discipline its own Members.”

    Oh well, can’t answer that. Right off the bat, don’t think so.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Wonder what kind of minesweeper Mlq3 has… a Lafayette class?

  • GPS said:

    “Burma land is used for refinery and gaz transmition to the many of surrounding countries, to that effect, Burma’s geographical location is crucial!” – MBW

    …but not as potent as oil, well, anyway I hope you’re right. I hope this refineries and gas transmissions would serve as an incentive.

  • karah said:

    No, MLQ3 has the MINESWEEPER game (the one bundled with Windows).

  • ramrod said:

    ECONOMY
    Burma is a resource-rich country with a strong agricultural base. It also has vast timber, natural gas, and fishery reserves and is a leading source of gems and jade. Tourist potential remains undeveloped because of weak infrastructure and Burma’s international image, which has been damaged by the junta’s human rights abuses and oppression of the democratic opposition. Due to Burma’s poor human rights record, the U.S. has imposed a range of trade sanctions, including bans on the importation of Burmese products into the U.S. and the export of financial services from the U.S. to Burma passed in 2003.

    The regime’s mismanagement of the economy has created a downward economic spiral. The state remains heavily involved in most parts of the economy, infrastructure has deteriorated, and no rule of law exists. The majority of Burmese citizens subsist on an average annual income of less than $200 per capita. Inflation, caused primarily by public sector deficit spending and the eroding value of the local currency (the kyat), have reduced living standards. The Asian Development Bank estimated in December 2006 that inflation in Burma could reach 30% in 2006-2007, in contrast with official estimates of 10%.

    The military’s commercial arms play a major role in the economy. The limited moves to a market economy have been accompanied by a significant rise in crony capitalism. A handful of companies loyal to the regime has benefited from policies that promote monopoly and privilege. State-controlled activity predominates in energy, heavy industry, and the rice trade. Agriculture, light industry, trade, and transport dominate the private sector.

    Burma remains a primarily agricultural economy with 50% of GDP derived from agriculture, livestock and fisheries, and forestry. Manufacturing/industry constitutes only 15% of recorded economic activity, and state industries continue to play a large role in that sector. Trade and services constitute only 35% of GDP.

    Foreign investment has declined precipitously since 1999 due to the increasingly unfriendly business environment and political pressure from Western consumers and shareholders. The government conserves foreign exchange by limiting imports and promoting exports. Published estimates of Burma’s foreign trade (particularly on the import side) are greatly understated because of the large volume of off-book, black-market, illicit, and unrecorded border trade.

    In the near term, growth will continue to be constrained by government mismanagement and minimal investment. A number of other countries, including member states of the European Union, Canada, and Australia have joined the United States in applying some form of sanctions against the regime.

    Government economic statistics are unavailable and unreliable. According to official figures, GDP growth has been over 10% annually since FY 1999-2000. However, the rate is likely much smaller. Burma’s limited economic growth results largely from its natural gas exports, which account for over half of Burma’s export receipts and foreign direct investment. Natural gas exports will increase significantly once production begins from the offshore Shwe and Shwephyu Fields, estimated to hold 5.7-10 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. In 2005-2006, the oil and gas sector accounted for $69 million in foreign direct investment. Corporations based in China, India, South Korea, Thailand, and Malaysia have interests in the exploration and development of several offshore blocks.

    Burma remains the world’s second-largest producer of illicit opium–although it amounts to only 11% of the world’s total. Annual production of opium is now estimated to be less than 20% of mid-1990 peak levels. Burma is also a primary source of amphetamine-type stimulants in Asia. Although the Burmese Government has expanded its counternarcotics measures in recent years, production and trafficking of narcotics and failure to adequately prosecute those involved remains a major problem in Burma.

  • ramrod said:

    Burma is rich in natural gas and opium (good enough incentives).

  • karah said:

    MBW It must be one of the reasons why “most” of the Military Officers is still loyal to the JUNTA. What sticks to their mind is this: “What will happen to us if a DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT would be in place? Would we have the same comfort?”

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Exactly! Pundits reckon that that is probably where the Burmese military (not the seniors) are.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    minesweeper? of course this one:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Vigilance_%28AM-324%29

    just kidding.

  • GPS said:

    karah,
    maybe it’s the same question some military officers of ours are asking, if they will help oust GMA.
    ” Would we have the same comfort?”

  • ramrod said:

    “From my own readings, ordinary members of the military have very high standards of living as opposed to the ordinary Burmese citizen. They have privileges that allow members of their families to enter into business, go to schools, other great material perks, i.e., TV or cell phones even.” – mbw

    This was what I was afraid of, money can negate my “cognitive dissonance” theory.

  • cvj said:

    Ramrod (at 6:57pm), it looks like the Burmese have sacrificed their rights and freedoms just to move their country backward.

  • karah said:

    Ram Did you get your info from the US State Department’s Profile of Burma? While reading I recalled I have already read what you have post somewhere. I have also read Burma Info from CIA, Wikipedia, and that of the US State Department.

    I have an impression that CHINA is eyeing some of the resources of Burma. It’s quite known that CHINA likes to invest in countries wherein the form of Government is either Dictatorial/Authoritarian and/or Ruled by a Junta. In this way, it’s easier to talk with Government rather than a Democratically-elected Government which would go thru a lot of channels, procedures, and processes.

    My heart goes to the ordinary citizens of Burma (those who are victims of all this). We can consider BURMA as a FAILED STATE inasmuch as people are starving due to hunger and poverty, people are dying due to Military excesses, people does not have access even to the most basic social services, and the list in endless.

    I am very sure that most of the Opium that Burma produces goes to Thailand (being a known trans-shipment point for all sorts of drugs).

  • ramrod said:

    “It’s quite known that CHINA likes to invest in countries wherein the form of Government is either Dictatorial/Authoritarian and/or Ruled by a Junta. In this way, it’s easier to talk with Government rather than a Democratically-elected Government which would go thru a lot of channels, procedures, and processes.” – karah

    Hmmmmmm…..Government to government agreement eh, sounds familiar.

  • karah said:

    GPS It’s a very valid assertion. Look at how GMA rewards former Generals (from the AFP and PNP).

  • ramrod said:

    Yes. US State Department’s Profile. By the looks of it a number of countries are siphoning their natural resources with permission from the Junta.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Good God! That IS an old minesweeper! No wonder can’t do job quickly anymore. (kidding too!)

    Modern minesweepers now are made of PVC. Lafayette class is stealth.

  • cvj said:

    During the Cold War, the United States also preferred to deal with Authoritarian states (like Chile, Iraq, Pakistan and of course the Philippines) as long as they sided with the West as opposed to democracies that sided with the Soviets (like India). It’s realpolitik, which is quite the opposite of Bush’s ideologically driven foreign policy.

  • cvj said:

    MBW, i’m sure that the Manuel Quezon III will be made of PVC.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    ramrod, the movie starred in by Nicolas Cage was Lord of War. it depicts exactly why wars never end. because its profitable. the arms industry itself fuel wars or jump start it just so they can keep on earning, supporting or fanning environments rife for war.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Hey speaking of the Barko Manuel L Quezon, I wonder whatever happened to it? Wonder if it’s been upgraded like the Aguinaldo Class or is it still in the same derelict situation as the Mabini Class

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Aw shucks, perhaps they haven’t gotten to the Q class in RP Navy yet! (Come in alphabetical order…)

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    They’re still upgrading the J class (Jacinto class)…

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    Is that because he’s using US technology? (Ok, just kidding…)

  • cvj said:

    MBW, i think it’s the same boat that Manolo linked to above.

  • ramrod said:

    Mbw, cvj

    You’re reading into it to much, its really a y-shaped stick sometimes known as divining rod.
    …or the guy normally in yellow t-shirt you see in the kalye with print “metro aide” on it…oops sorry, “street sweeper” pala yun hehehe

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj, you probably meant SHIP not boat!

    Heheheh! “its really a y-shaped stick… “

  • ramrod said:

    DevilsAdvc8,

    Yes that was it, Lord of War. Its strange how guns, drugs, and blood diamonds usually go together, along with dictators and military juntas.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Re: GPS “maybe it’s the same question some military officers of ours are asking, if they will help oust GMA.
    ” Would we have the same comfort?”

    I’m mighty sure, that’s one of the major reasons!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Re: “how guns, drugs, and blood diamonds usually go together, along with dictators and military juntas.”

    Exactly where the Burma is at! Guns, loads of them from China, blood diamonds entire Burma for the extracting (well, almost) dictators a plenty!

  • cvj said:

    Exactly where the Burma is at! Guns, loads of them from China, blood diamonds entire Burma for the extracting (well, almost) dictators a plenty! – MBW

    I gather that the mining sector is what’s driving the Philippine economy as well.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    In terms of legit business, Burma junta trade legally with any Western nation and Asian nation in gas and in diamonds!

    So freezing trade with them at least on those 2 legit businesses could contribute eventually to undermining Burma junta living although am sure they’ve hoarded so much money abroad already so that if they are forced to fly out, they’d continue living like kings.

    They should not be allowed to leave to avoid their accessing their bank accounts. If they have to be toppled, they must be charged, indicted and punished IN Burma so new govt could re-claim the Junta members’ individual ill gotten wealth.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    re I gather that the mining sector is what’s driving the Philippine economy as well.

    Your graph in your blog shows that and that was one of my concerns…

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Am pretty sure many of our Manila matrons can boast of at least possessing a piece of jewelry mounted with a Burmese diamond, i.e., ruby, saphire, etc.

  • cvj said:

    In terms the Junta members accessing their bank accounts, i think Singapore (and other financial centers) has to agree to waive its bank secrecy laws (which i hear are more stringent than that of Switzerland’s) in preparation for a future freezing of assets.

  • ramrod said:

    Hey guys, guess who’s hand is it that rocks the cradle?

    US Multinational Oil Giant Chevron Fuels The Brutal Regime In Burma
    Harry Oo

    Fueling the military junta that has ruled for decades are Burma’s natural-gas reserves, controlled by the Burmese regime in partnership with the U.S. multinational oil giant Chevron, the French oil company Total and a Thai oil firm. Offshore natural-gas facilities deliver their extracted gas to Thailand through Burma’s Yadana pipeline. The pipeline was built with slave labor, forced into servitude by the Burmese military.
    The original pipeline partner, Unocal, was sued by EarthRights International for the use of slave labor. As soon as the suit was settled out of court, Chevron bought Unocal.
    Chevron’s role in propping up the brutal regime in Burma is clear. According to Marco Simons, U.S. legal director at EarthRights International: “Sanctions haven’t worked because gas is the lifeline of the regime. Before Yadana went online, Burma’s regime was facing severe shortages of currency. It’s really Yadana and gas projects that kept the military regime afloat to buy arms and ammunition and pay its soldiers.”

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj, then, perhaps the courts in Brussels (Kingdom of Belgium laws not EU) can do the job that is if the Burmese files lawsuits against the Junta guys and obtain proper court ruling ordering a bank to open its records a bit???… just a thought.

    Yeah… can see the uphill battle a new Burmese govt would have to face.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    Yeah Chevron and Total arm in arm!

  • ramrod said:

    “re I gather that the mining sector is what’s driving the Philippine economy as well.
    Your graph in your blog shows that and that was one of my concerns…”

    Yes. Even gigantic food conglomerate San Miguel is investing in it.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    But if any consolation, Total has been ordered by Pres Sarkozy to freeze investments in Burma.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    French outfit I think has started closing down some of the operations in some areas there to comply with order.

  • ramrod said:

    “But if any consolation, Total has been ordered by Pres Sarkozy to freeze investments in Burma.” -mbw

    They should. No point in their people protesting to high heavens while their industrialists hold hands with the junta boy toys. What did uncle Sam do?

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Uncle Sam? Don’t know – heaven’t heard Uncle Bush mouth something specific as that yet, i.e., asking Chevron to freeze investments.

  • Harry said:

    when it comes to oil and gas, there’s no such thing as sanctions for these people. it’s all about the money. the present junta in burma is actually very advantageous for some multinationals – just talk to the guy in charge and you’re set.

    harry clay

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Should be easier for Bush, shouldn’t it? He’s got friends in the oil industry… Wait, that might be the reason we haven’t heard him say something as specific as that publicly, coz of his friends? (Btw, where is Cheney?)

  • TDC said:

    In her latest junket,Gloria Pidal received a scroll on “The Seven Social Sins” by Mahatma Gandhi.

    Mrs.Pidal,I hope you read what is written in the Scroll of The Seven Social Sins:

    Quoted by Mahatma Gandhi in “Young India”, 1925

    1)Politics without principles

    2)Wealth without work

    3)Pleasure without conscience

    4)Knowledge without character

    5)Commerce without morality

    6)Science without humanity

    7))Worship without sacrifice

    Gloira Pidal:Quo Vadis?

  • ramrod said:

    Conjunctivitis!

    I Harry, just for you I copied the whole list of spells in my pc.

  • Harry said:

    mr. shoot from the hip from texas is busy with iraq and how to make money. mr. quack quack cheney is busy with hunting. it’s been a tried and tested idea that when the heat is rising, these multinationals back down, when the issues dies down, they back to back. it’s how things work.

    harry clay

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Wow! Reciting those in front of Indians? Wow! The nerve. Did any Indian journalist ask questions?

  • ramrod said:

    tdc,

    Wow! You just enumerated the sins of several senators, most of the congressmen, and a few tycoons, and of course presidential families.

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    the conjunctivitis curse. i’ve read that you hail from cebu? it’s good to see a province mate in here.

    harry clay

  • BrianB said:

    “but it look so good in the brochures…”

    Hi, just bought a white macbook after three months of looking around. It’s thousands cheaper than in stores, brand new. Now, the curious thing is, I know a new Mac OS will come out in a couple of weeks. I also know a new macbook design, probably aluminum (yummy) will come right after, and supposedly competitively priced (aggressive is the word Apple used). But why did I buy now? Ayokong manakaw.

    “manolo, since you are teaching (at Letran?), why don’t you assign some of your research projects on history (e.g. philippine territory during Spanish times) to your students? for bonus points?”

    They allow undergrads to teach in Letran?

    Re: Burma

    The international community should stop applying embargoes. Instead go after the leaders, not through assassination but attaching an official stigma to these leaders. For example if the US and Europe threaten PGMA and family a permanent ban on entry, they’ll think twice before doing what they’re doing now. No visas for the corrupt.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Latest:

    Junta leader Than Shwe has announced that he is prepared to meet jailed opposition leader San Suu Kyi …
    provided she met certain government-dictated conditions, including ending her support for sanctions on Burma.

    Than Shwe is known to harbour a visceral hatred for Suu Ki, so his offer is seen by Burmese opposition activists as only another trick to divert attention from a continuing crackdown on dissidents and monasteries. Homes in Rangoon and Mandalay and a number of monasteries were again raided in the early hours of today.

    http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?storyID=9006

  • ramrod said:

    harry,

    I think I remember this fat guy talking about that on tv (awful truth stuff) and there was a movie exactly about this issue shown on cable tv starring this guy from “Foot Loose” and “Hollow Man”

  • ramrod said:

    “provided she met certain government-dictated conditions, including ending her support for sanctions on Burma.” – mbw

    Destabilization, she’s guilty of destabilization against the strong republic of Burma!

  • Harry said:

    “The international community should stop applying embargoes. Instead go after the leaders, not through assassination but attaching an official stigma to these leaders. For example if the US and Europe threaten PGMA and family a permanent ban on entry, they’ll think twice before doing what they’re doing now. No visas for the corrupt.” – BrianB

    ah but some leaders of other countries came into power with the auspices of some western countries. look at marcos and how the us literally siphoned him and his family out of the philippines, i.e., using us military transport. we cannot discount the fact that us, and some countries in europe need some leaders for trade, for strategic and defense purposes, even if these leaders are persona non grata.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Brian,

    Re: “For example if the US and Europe threaten PGMA and family a permanent ban on entry, they’ll think twice before doing what they’re doing now. No visas for the corrupt.”

    Europe (or I suppose US for that matter though not sure of US) can only do that if the country’s people themselves have exhausted all legal avenues toward prosecuting the corrupt or if the Filipino people do the same thing as the Burmese.

    Inasmuch as that is not happening, i.e., similar to Burmese people uprising, there’s not much Europe or the US for that matter can do.

    There has to be an overt expression by the Filipino people at home through uprising against our corrupt leaders for a Western govt to declare these corrupt leaders persona non grata.

    Europe has done this already against a few leaders here and from Africa. But they could do that because the people rose against these corrupt leaders and with proof showed that their leaders were corrupt.

    Sadly, we have to go by this moral rule of law no matter how individually bad we feel.

  • rego said:

    “We can only do as much as supporting the cause and us being morale boosters to the Burmese people. Other than that, we are helpless in a sense that we cannot involve ourselves too deep in the matter because it’s the fight of the Burmese people, not ours.”
    —————————————–

    couldn’t agree for more

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod, Heheheh! That’s why Shwe hates her!

  • Harry said:

    “The international community should stop applying embargoes. Instead go after the leaders, not through assassination but attaching an official stigma to these leaders. For example if the US and Europe threaten PGMA and family a permanent ban on entry, they’ll think twice before doing what they’re doing now. No visas for the corrupt.” – BrianB

    ah but some leaders of other countries came into power with the auspices of some western countries. look at marcos and how the us literally siphoned him and his family out of the philippines, i.e., using us military transport. we cannot discount the fact that us, and some countries in europe need some leaders for trade, for strategic and defense purposes, even if these leaders are persona non grata.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Brian,

    In the same vein and following Ramrod’s thought above (transposing here):

    ““Europe can only do as much as supporting the cause and us being morale boosters to the Philippine people. Other than that, Europe are helpless in a sense that they cannot involve themselves too deep in the matter because it’s the fight of the Philippine people, not theirs.”

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ooops sorry that was Rego’s thouhgt pala di si Ramrod…

  • Harry said:

    “We can only do as much as supporting the cause and us being morale boosters to the Burmese people. Other than that, we are helpless in a sense that we cannot involve ourselves too deep in the matter because it’s the fight of the Burmese people, not ours.” -karah

    excellent and i agree 101%, yes, it’s an internal matter. how will the people of burma learn to fight for their freedom if they won’t take it upon themselves to fight for it

    harry clay

  • cvj said:

    I think every bit of support helps. We’re all connected you know.

  • rego said:

    “if cardinal rosales yelled at the president she should resign, then piously tells the people let’s move on, i think he can be taken to task vs. another bishop who might say, consistently, forget politics, period and another bishop who consistently has something strong to say vs. say gambling and abductions. ”

    Manolo,

    Sa aking palagay wala kay Cardinal Rosales ang problema. Nasa Vatican at yung panunungkulan ni Pope Benidict VI (?)Yung Papa ang nag utos sa mga cardinal na wag makialam sa politika. Tapagpagpatupad lang si cardinal Rosales sa kautusang yan.

  • Harry said:

    “I think I remember this fat guy talking about that on tv (awful truth stuff) and there was a movie exactly about this issue shown on cable tv starring this guy from “Foot Loose” and “Hollow Man”” -ramrod

    you referring to kevin bacon? the thing you watched, is that one of those documentaries they air on tv? there are also instances that these documentaries twist and add something to the truth more than the truth itself.

    harry clay

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Harry, that’s an unfair statement “how will the people of burma learn to fight for their freedom if they won’t take it upon themselves to fight for it”, thoroughly unfair!

    The Burmese, just like the Filipinos have never stopped fighting for their freedom, be it against their colonial rulers or against their home grown tyrants.

    When it comes to fighting for freedom, the Burmese have nothing to be ashamed of – they have gone through several bloody uprisings in modern history, perhaps more than modern Pinas ever had!

  • ramrod said:

    “excellent and i agree 101%, yes, it’s an internal matter. how will the people of burma learn to fight for their freedom if they won’t take it upon themselves to fight for it” – harry

    They will. Suppression, repression, or whatever it is tyrants use has a bad side effect – it almost always results in rebellion unless of course you turn them into gentle sheep.

    Obliviate!

  • cvj said:

    When it comes to fighting for freedom, the Burmese have nothing to be ashamed of…-MBW

    Amen to that, their monks are eating bullets. They haven’t yet been infected by the move on mentality.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    If at all, along those lines, perhaps modern Filipinos have something to learn from the Burmese… they are never afraid to spill blood by the thousands in one go to fight their tyrants.

    Many Burmese have learned to fight for their freedom long ago…

  • karah said:

    Rego The Catholic Church has the moral authority to address social issues but not meddle with Politics. Unlike the vocal and “politically active” Cardinal Sin, Cardinal Rosales is more of a type that works silently on his own (this is my impression).

    If I may ask, could you give me a link or an Article about this “admonition” of Pope Benedict XVI (not VI)? The former Cardinal Ratzinger is a very conservative and “to the letter” Cleric. I’ll be waiting where I could find the Article or some Church Document about this. Thanks in advance.

  • Harry said:

    rego:

    there’s no place for cardinal rosales to meddle with philippine politics unless moral issues are involved. maybe some people miss cardinal sin and his constant proclamation of his political stand on political issues.

    harry clay

  • ramrod said:

    “you referring to kevin bacon?” – harry

    Yes. It had a very interesting angle, Kevin Bacon’s character was assigned to develop this oil pipeline in a third world country but he found out some people were massacred because of this pipeline so he set out to expose it only find out that the US senator he spilled the beans to was aware of this already and they tolerated it because the country’s need for oil is more important.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Also, during WWII, the Burmese helped British and American forces fight the Japanese. They were party to the defeat of Japan.

  • Harry said:

    “They will. Suppression, repression, or whatever it is tyrants use has a bad side effect – it almost always results in rebellion unless of course you turn them into gentle sheep.” -ramrod

    hope so. it’s been decades. hope they wake up sooner. you getting the hang of mr. potter’s spells, ei?

    harry clay

  • Harry said:

    “Yes. It had a very interesting angle, Kevin Bacon’s character was assigned to develop this oil pipeline in a third world country but he found out some people were massacred because of this pipeline so he set out to expose it only find out that the US senator he spilled the beans to was aware of this already and they tolerated it because the country’s need for oil is more important.” -ramrod

    happens all the time in movies. the protagonist finds out something and tries to expose only to find out that the very people who should be looking into the part are in collusion with the very people the people would implicate in a crime. funny but true. in some movies, it ends with a congressional investigation. then what? it’s futile all along.

    harry clay

  • rego said:

    Manolo,

    That DFA modernization story really made me laugh.It really mad emy day.

    Now I can go back to the project site with some sense of “freshness” and get over with this much delayed project.

    Maraming Salamat.

    HAVE A NICE WEEKEND EVERYONE!

    Dont you guys go out and party on weekends?

    Geez mga blogoholics na kayo!

    Sa tinagatagal ko sa blog na to, ngayon lang yata umaabot lagi sa 200+ ang mga comments sa mga thread. Hirap maka catch up!

    Or may be age is catching up on me? But hey I am not really that old . Im only 41. Kaya lang reading karah’s account that he was just 5 years old when Marcos fleed makes me feel so old na.

  • Harry said:

    karah:

    peace V (with a v sign). won’t pester you no more. -_-

    harry clay

  • ramrod said:

    Hi Hermione este Karah

    “Sa aking palagay wala kay Cardinal Rosales ang problema. Nasa Vatican at yung panunungkulan ni Pope Benidict VI (?)Yung Papa ang nag utos sa mga cardinal na wag makialam sa politika. Tapagpagpatupad lang si cardinal Rosales sa kautusang yan.” – rego

    Yep. Cardinal Rosales has to obey the big guy, he still has a chance to be “Pope Rosales”, as for the other – Cardinal Sin, he had no chance ever since, the vatican will never annoint a “Pope Sin!”

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    the “fat guy” on Awful Truth is Michael Moore. writer and director of Fahernheit 9/11, Bowling for Columbine, and the now showing, Sicko.

  • ramrod said:

    rego,

    I’m also 41. Honestly, blogging is the only diversion that my wife allows me to have, just as long as I don’t peek in the FHM and boybastos websites.

  • ramrod said:

    Yes Manolo,

    That DFA modernization story cracked me up, I’m going to tell that to my ooficemates.

  • karah said:

    Ram The Roman Catholic Church heirarchy puts premium in “obedience.” Nah, Cardinal Rosales is a very reserved and silent guy. Even the ever vocal and princely (prince of the church arrogance) disposition of Cardinal Sanchez didn’t even put him in the halls of power in the Vatican. It’s still a “regional thing.” Pope John Paul II was an exceptional case.

    I do think the Italians would wanna regain back the Papacy after Pope Benedict XVI.

  • ramrod said:

    “the “fat guy” on Awful Truth is Michael Moore. writer and director of Fahernheit 9/11, Bowling for Columbine, and the now showing, Sicko.” – devils

    Michael Moore. Now this guys got balls, there was a feature wherein he pestered Chalston Heston (NRA) and even George Bush himself.

  • TDC said:

    To me the most serious crime of Gloria Pidal is the fact
    that she just can’t inspire anybody because NO ONE IN HIS RIGHT MIND can trust what she says.

    That’s a real tragedy for this country.No inspirational leaders at all!

    By inspirational, I simply mean the ability to motivate others to accomplish something significant, perhaps even heroic!

    Bakit kaya?

  • karah said:

    Harry Honestly, there are times I feel lazy answering comments in here when you’re stalking me. I even thought of the possibility of going back to Jove’s Blog even though there aren’t any people in there. Be as it may, thanks for that statement of yours and I hope you would keep your word.

  • cvj said:

    Pope John Paul II was also ‘conservative’ but he was an instrumental player in Poland’s Solidarity-led protest movement during the 80′s. I wonder what criteria the Roman Catholic Church uses to give its blessings to one kind of protest and not another. As for Cardinal Rosales, he is on record saying that the killings during the Arroyo administration is a mere ‘speck’ compared to that during the time of Marcos. If ever he is considered to be working silently, it would be for the other side.

  • Harry said:

    “Michael Moore. Now this guys got balls, there was a feature wherein he pestered Chalston Heston (NRA) and even George Bush himself.” -ramrod

    the guy has guts, what can i say. some of this points are valid but there are times he overdoes it. i’ve seen bowling for columbine and sicko. he even had this campaign of ‘vote for ficus.’ he campaigned for a plant to go against a congressman in one district in the us. he’s a gutsy at the same time a sick fella.

    harry clay

  • cvj said:

    Nice thing about this blog is that it attracts all ages. AFAIK, from 19(Rom) to 67(Bencard). Ramrod, i thought you were much older but it turns out we’re almost the same age. Of course in a virtual community, we can choose any age or any gender we like.

  • ramrod said:

    “Yep. Cardinal Rosales has to obey the big guy, he still has a chance to be “Pope Rosales”, as for the other – Cardinal Sin, he had no chance ever since, the vatican will never annoint a “Pope Sin!”” – Ramrod

    Karah, I was just trying to be funny, “the vatican will never annoint a “Pope Sin!”” get it?

    Nah, I was trying to come up with something funnier than the DFA modernization joke…

  • karah said:

    cvj In terms of Doctrine, yes, Pope John Paul II was considered to be “conservative.” I myself though would consider him as a CONTEMPLATIVE IN ACTION. He was open-minded at the same time really pulsed the feel of the very people within the Catholic Church. He was a listener.

    I’m not that very familiar with the different stands of Cardinal Rosales on a multitude of issues. When the time comes, we will see if he can “step up to the challenge.” I don’t think Cardinal Sin recommended Cardinal to be his successor for not reason. Well Cardinal Sin would have wanted Bishop Soc Villegas (his protoge) to succeed him but time was running out for him.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    OK TDC, sorry read it very quickly, the scroll of the 7 social sins was presented to Gloria.

    These Indians are very politicall correct, aren’t they?

  • ramrod said:

    “To me the most serious crime of Gloria Pidal is the fact
    that she just can’t inspire anybody” – tdc

    As I commented before, she reminds me of those TRYING HARD, appeal-challenged school mates who tries to sound “inspirational” in valedictory addresses but then nobody’s listening. All you hear is how she did this, did that, we should do this, and we could also be like her – puke!

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    would have wanted to comment on what you said but i defer. karah might misconstrue it as me starting again.

    harry clay

  • TDC said:

    “OK TDC, sorry read it very quickly, the scroll of the 7 social sins was presented to Gloria.

    These Indians are very political correct, aren’t they?MBW”

    I think they were trying to prick her conscience!

    But nothing works with Gloria Pidal.She does not have a conscience at all.For a photo-op,she can be shown in a very pious pose in a churrch.The nex minute,she could be thinking of her next big racket with mike pidal.

    I am beginning to arrive at the point of vie that Gloria Pidal is worst than Marcos.(at best ,equal to Marcos.)

    Marcos was ruthless but brilliant.Gloria Pidal is ruthless
    and amateurish in all fronts.

  • TDC said:

    “As I commented before, she reminds me of those TRYING HARD, appeal-challenged school mates who tries to sound “inspirational” in valedictory addresses but then nobody’s listening. All you hear is how she did this, did that, we should do this, and we could also be like her – puke!ramrod”

    She acts like a mentally challenged AMATEUR trying very hard hard to play the role of presidentita.comic caricature of a nora aunor but who is not funny at all!

    She is so pathetic to me!

  • GPS said:

    “These Indians are very politicall(y) correct, aren’t they?” – MBW

    If I may add they are also satirically correct,aren’t they?

  • ramrod said:

    harry,

    I think karah’s seemingly harry-specific androphobia is nothing very serious. Just apply the lessons given by the fox to the Little Prince in the book of the same title.

  • TDC said:

    “These Indians are very politicall(y) correct, aren’t they?” – MBW

    If I may add they are also satirically correct,aren’t they?GPS

    Touche

  • ramrod said:

    harry,

    You mentioned you were from Cebu, Lapu2 or Cebu City? USC or USJR?

  • TDC said:

    Can you help me define what kind of image does Gloria Pidal really project in spite of or because of the help of her spinmasters?

    *a Good, but not a Great President
    *Gloria Labandera
    *Mother of the Strong Republic
    *Nora Aunor Twin(separated at birth)
    *Mrs.Gloria Pidal
    *Garci’s phone-pal
    *Let’s Move On “Cheerleader”
    *none of the above(specify what you think)

  • GPS said:

    TDC,
    Mabuti hindi “nangliit” si GMA nang iabot ang scroll sa kanya.

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    cebu city. didn’t study in cebu though my roots are really from cebu. you a USC or USJR guy?

    harry clay

  • ramrod said:

    harry,

    USC

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Hihihihih! “Mabuti hindi “nangliit” si GMA nang iabot ang scroll sa kanya.”

  • TDC said:

    GPS see the picture of Gloria Pidal being handed the scroll in Inquirer on Line.

    If I were to put a thought balloon on top of her head she would be thinking “Akala ng mga ito sila lang ang marunong ng 5/6.ako naman ABCZTEFG!”

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    i’ve read that you’re already 41. that makes you my manong.

    harry clay

  • ramrod said:

    “If I were to put a thought balloon on top of her head she would be thinking “Akala ng mga ito sila lang ang marunong ng 5/6.ako naman ABCZTEFG!” – tdc

    Are you kidding? She probably blurted out “Thank you very much for this gift, you know it has been my mission in life not to tolerate these despicable transgressions.” You know, I’ve done this, did that, blah, blah, blah…

  • GPS said:

    TDC,
    Nananadya talaga itong mga Indians,hawak na ni GMA ang maliit na scroll, meron pang malaki sa harap niya.

    If I were to put a thought ballon on top of the Indian official, he would be saying this words: “Mrs. President, hindi po iyang maliit na scroll ang iuuwi ninyo, kungdi iyang malaking nakadikit sa pader!”

  • TDC said:

    Ramrod/GPS: you guys are witty! Be careful baka ma quote kayo sa “Daily show” where our beloved ST.Cory was called a “slut”

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Heh! Ramrod’s ““Thank you very much for this gift, you know it has been my mission in life not to tolerate these despicable transgressions.” You know, I’ve done this, did that, blah, blah, blah…”

    “Yeah, yeah,” sabi ng mag Indians, “Yabang! Yeah”

  • TDC said:

    The caption of the photo should have been “REPENT”.Gloria Pidal is guilty as charged on all 7 counts:

    “7 Deadly Social Sins(By Gandhi)”

    1] politics without principle

    2] wealth without work

    3] commerce without morality

    4] pleasure without conscience

    5] education without character

    6] science without humanity

    7] worship without sacrifice

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Heheheh”"The caption of the photo should have been “REPENT”.”

    Tdc, but she’s perfectly capable of turning around and informing the Indians around her that “No need, I speak to God and God speaks to me back, that’s why I’m president!”

    (Bishop Cruz then can remind her again, “When you talk to God, that’s called prayer. When God speaks to you back, that’s called schizophrenia.”)

  • TDC said:

    MBW

    The Indians are also trying to tell Gloria Pidal “Tama na ang big time 5.6 rackets ninyo ni Mr.Pidal sa Pinas!”

    Tant va la cruche à l’eau qu’à la fin elle se casse.(Enough is enough!)

  • ramrod said:

    The caption of the photo should have been “REPENT”.Gloria Pidal is guilty as charged on all 7 counts: – tdc

    Or “Lifetime Achievement Award” for unparalled excellence in the following categories :

    1] politics without principle

    2] wealth without work

    3] commerce without morality

    4] pleasure without conscience

    5] education without character

    6] science without humanity

    7] worship without sacrifice

    You guys are wicked, don’t you have night lives?

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    C’est absolument vrai! Vous avez tout a fait raison, TDC! (comme disait Mitterand!)

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod’s Or “Lifetime Achievement Award” for unparalled excellence in the following categories :

    LOVE IT! EXCELLENT, EXCELLENT!

  • Harry said:

    can we discuss more sensible matters in here rather than indulge in personal attacks?

    harry clay

  • ramrod said:

    Mikey, este Harry pala,

    Please forgive the indulgences of grown men pecking away at the computer on a perfectly beautiful Friday night while the rest of the world is out cavorting in a pub somewhere…

  • TDC said:

    You guys are wicked, don’t you have night lives?”Ramrod

    There no nights or days in being vigilant against the creeping dictatorship of Gloria Pidal.

    As William Wallace said in”Brave Heart”:

    “Aye, fight and you may die. Run and you’ll live … at least for a while. And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin’ to trade all the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they’ll never take … our freedom!”

  • TDC said:

    “i’ve read that you’re already 41. that makes you my manong.
    harry clay”

    Harry:IS this more sensible ?

  • Harry said:

    great people talk about IDEAS. average people talk about THINGS. small people talk about OTHER PEOPLE.

  • Harry said:

    TDC:

    great people talk about IDEAS. average people talk about THINGS. small people talk about OTHER PEOPLE.

    i guess you now know where you belong

  • TDC said:

    “great people talk about IDEAS. average people talk about THINGS. small people talk about OTHER PEOPLE.Harry Caly”

    “i’ve read that you’re already 41. that makes you my manong.
    harry clay”

    Harry:sure Harry!

  • karah said:

    I’m on “watchmode.”

  • karah said:

    I’ll be on the lookout on who falls down first.

  • Harry said:

    TDC:

    so you were taught to attack people on their back because you can’t confront the person? isn’t that cowardice?

    better yet, join the rallyists. oh i forgot, you only say those things in the blogs because you’re behind the monitor, right?

  • ramrod said:

    tdc,

    That was an awesome movie and that speech too, also liked The Patriot, We Were Soldiers, but I couldn’t take Passion of the Christ, and I didn’t get Apocalypto.

    Yes…Freedom! We are all Burmese!

  • Harry said:

    TDC:

    very aggressive behind a computer but as timid as a dog in public. hahahaha

  • Harry said:

    TDC:

    have some self-respect. you come in a blog and attack, attack, attack a person. the person you’re attacking doesn’t even know. plain grumbling and backbiting. is that what the old generation does these days, huh?

  • TDC said:

    Im also on watch mode now.I want to see Harry talk about more “sensible things”…Good night.Have a nice weekend all.

  • ramrod said:

    karah,

    You still here? Etu, karah, etu. Whats the update on Burma lately?

  • Harry said:

    TDC:

    it makes me barf that older people who should be more graceful in handling things are showing very good example like kvetching and bitching. oh come on. makes me sick.

  • karah said:

    Ram Don’t know any updates yet. I’m just here in the Blog, refreshing and refreshing. I don’t wanna join the exchange of words because I might say unpleasant things. I’m just munching my NAGARAYA in here. :P

  • Harry said:

    tdc: another case of hit and run, ei?

  • ramrod said:

    harry,

    Now you’re making the rest of us exhibit symptoms of harry-specific androphobia. Do not forget the cardinal rule of having a pleasant personality “do not be offensive.” In speech, decorum, and odour (most especially the last one).

  • Harry said:

    tdc:

    if you wanna talk about sensible things, open a topic and we’ll talk. let’s see if you’re better at discussing things or attacking people behind their backs. i thought the older bloggers in here are good example. i was mistaken.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Oh wow, that’s very good to hear, Manolo!

    “Three Philippine Navy vessels also participated in the training exercise namely BRP Artemio Ricarte (PS 37), BRP Bienvenido Salting (PG 112), and BRP Quezon (PS 70).”

    Am glad!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    I would have preferred one of the Jacinto class that’s being upgraded with the latest weapons systems be renamed BRP Manuel Quezon instead but good to hear it’s still a fighting ship!

  • ramrod said:

    karah,

    So you went to Daan Bantayan, where the danggit and pusit are caught, salted, and dried. I used to go there once a quarter (when you were probably 10 years old) to cover the doctors there, actually only 5, but mostly to eat seafood and relax in one of the beach resorts.

  • Harry said:

    ramrod:

    i think i’ve made my point. i’ll leave it at that. i just noticed a chronic and habitual deliberate set of attacks. opinions are fine, but personal attacks and mockery are i think defies any form of decorum. whether the person is here or not, whether we like the person or not, let’s act, speak, and write like human beings. that’s all. if we behave like the very people we attack, then where’s the difference in there?

    harry clay

  • karah said:

    Ram Yes, been to Daan-Bantayan but I think dried fish in Bantayan Island is still cheaper. I love danggit, pusit, and those deboned white bolinao (did I spell that right?). Been to Malapascua Island and Camotes Island as well. There are a lot of nice places in Cebu even in the countryside. I miss the Dried Mangoes.

  • Harry said:

    note:

    even freedom of speech is not absolute.

  • karah said:

    Didn’t know that Hit and Run Tactics is also employed here in the Blogs. :D

  • ramrod said:

    karah,

    Now Bantayan Island is an island paradise, what was the name of that popular resort there? I’m curious, what took you to all these places in the Visayas? For me it was my first job after college selling for ZPC so I had to visit every drugstore, hospital, and dispensing physicians within the vicinity of Cebu, Bohol, and Dumaguete.

  • karah said:

    Ram Re: Bantayan Island Resorts, I only know of Budyong? I’m quite an adventurer but what led me to Cebu is upon the invitation of some friends. I do allocate some budget for my yearly travelling expenses – domestic & international. ZPC (Zuellig Philippines)?

    Been to Bohol as well. Panglao Island, Hinagdanan Cave, the Blood Compact site, the really cute Tarsiers in Loboc (ate at the floating restaurants at Loboc River). Of course, the Churches in Dauis, Loboc, Baclayon (interesting Museum). Been to Dumaguete as well. What I like about Dumaguete is that their street system is very easy to memorize and all roads lead to the breakwater. Nice places. And yes, Apo Island’s white sand is comparable to Boracay.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    Read this: “Never in the history of the Armed Forces of the Philippines has one man and his criminal gang brought so much shame to our beloved organization,” said the officers in a statement distributed to media covering the court martial proceedings in Camp Capinpin in Tanay, Rizal.

    The officers were referring to Esperon. Shit! I’m proud of those officers! That’s what I meant by moral courage!

    The reports in Ellen’s blog http://www.ellentordesillas.com says, “Military officers linked to last year’s supposed power grab attempt dared AFP chief Gen. Hermogenes Esperon Jr. to “tell the truth” about allegations that the military helped rig the May 2004 polls to ensure President Arroyo’s victory.”

  • ramrod said:

    Karah,

    Wow! You’ve been to places I myself wasn’t able to go to and I’ve been going to these cities for years. Yes its Zuellig Pharma, I was a drug pusher.
    Next month, November I’m sure you can’t top this trip, I’m going to visit the banana plantations in Davao of Uni Frutti and La Panday, maybe also Dole if theres time.

  • Bencard said:

    ramrod, i’m sorry, i didn’t see your 9:17 am (10/5) post until now. been out of town without my laptop and missed reading the interesting discussions going on,

    too bad, you pinpointed a portion of my comment regarding refusal of a soldier to fire against violent aggressors as being a cop-out, if not dereliction of duty. you should have taken it in context with my entire comment.

    i don’t think its a prerogative of a soldier to JUDGE the constitutionality or legality of an order from the chain of command. if each of the members of the armed forces is allowed to do so, imagine the chaos that would result, ultimately resulting in each turning their weapons against one another, each claiming that he is merely following the soldier’s code of conduct.

    the constitution prescribes who determines the legality or constitutionality of an act. everyone is free to make his own interpretation at his own risk, and the one who has the final say is the supreme court of the land. the civilian government is superior over the military and the former’s orders and decisions must be obeyed by the latter without question.

    neither do i think that a soldier has the prerogative to decide for himself that a government is “illegitmate”, or that he could “withdraw” support from a government without a clear judicial mandate. this is not saying that he is barred from doing all these as a person and a citizen. but he should cease being a “soldier” of a nation and must surrender his weapons first.

    mlq3, that was a masterly analysis of the responsibility of citizenship. one can oppose and despise the incumbent but that do not excuse anyone from abiding in the rule of law. even a “de facto” government is entitled to obedience and respect, if not love, for the sake of order and peace. its lawful action has the same legal effect as that of a de jure government.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencard,

    Re: “i don’t think its a prerogative of a soldier to JUDGE the constitutionality or legality of an order from the chain of command.”

    It is THE ULTIMATE PREROGATIVE of a soldier to judge the LEGALITY OF AN ORDER!

    It behooves a soldier to INTERPRET an order when he believes it is illegal, eg. when a commander orders his troops to SET A HOUSE ON FIRE WHEN THERE ARE CHILDREN IN IT.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Soldier can refuse to fire at unarmed civilians even if ordered by a superior because he deems it’s ILLEGAL.

    Orders to shoot unarmed civilians, to shoot children with to kill is ILLEGAL!

  • GPS said:

    Hey Bloggers, what do you make of this statement by the President whle in India, interviewed by the Malacanang Press Corp and a last minute report in the inquirer website:

    “Arroyo also admitted for the first time that former socioeconomics secretary Romulo Neri had informed her of the alleged bribery attempt of erstwhile elections chief Benjamin Abalos Sr.

    “Yeah, I can confirm that,” said Arroyo.

    But she told the former socioeconomic secretary to reject the alleged offer. The President did not elaborate on the circumstances surrounding the bribery.”

    Inquirer report as of 11:44 p.m.
    MANILA, Philippines — A new impeachment complaint was filed against President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo Friday at the House of Representatives, an opposition lawmaker said.

  • karah said:

    Ram I take one-month off each year to travel. Sure Zuellig is one of those Pharma Companies that’s very much against the passing of the CHEAPER MEDICINES BILL. Pharma business in the Philippines is a very lucrative endeavor indeed. It means lots and lots of $$$$$$$.

    Lapanday of the Lorenzo’s which dominates the Fresh Fruit Export Industry. Of course, there’s the MNC’s – Del Monte, Dole, Sumitomo and Uni Frutti. The Plantation of DOLE is in Bukidnon, right?

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    IT STOPS THERE! Military Law says, soldier has the right to refuse an order that he deems illegal… examples given above!

    Check Geneva war conventions for similar too military rule if you want.

  • Harry said:

    ramrod & karah:

    night. i’m off to bed.

    harry clay

  • Pilipinoparin said:

    Devils,

    May I cut and paste your entry in the your blog about Desparates? This maybe a new topic for discussion in our alumni forum in conjunctions with the FMGs present and future situation because of this ABC thing.

    Although you raised some valid points especially about the “good” senator’s behavior, our point of discussion is completely a different banana. Some may not grasp the gravity and ramifications of this thing especially with regards to physician-patient relationship, the complete trust, the integrity and expertise which if altered in some way may result to irreparable damage on patients, loss of lives and maybe lawsuits. This is specially true in cases in the ER, SICU,CCU,ICU and in numerous instances where minutes and even seconds count during medical decision making This may not affect us, old timer FMGs since our practice is already well established. However, we are thinking of the newbies, those who have just finished their training and those future FMG colleagues fresh from 747.

    Devil, if I remember right, in one of your posts, you are a PT, a member of the medical management team? You fully understand where I am coming from. You worked with the team, you attended cases in M& M, morning, midnight and maybe grand rounds.

  • ramrod said:

    Bencard,

    The soldiers code of conduct (in order of priority} says :

    1. I am a Filipino Soldier .I will support and
    defend the constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.

    2. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will fight all forces
    that would destroy the freedom of the Filipino People.

    3. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will obey the law,
    legal orders and decrees of my lawful superiors at all times.

    4. I am a Filipino Soldier. I will fight and die in the
    true Filipino tradition of valor, honor, duty and loyalty.

    To all these I pledge my life, my treasure and my sacred honor.

    No. 1 Support and defend the constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. The chain of command is in no. 3.

    You don’t need to wait for the supreme court to tell you that shooting innocent civilians is against the constitution and this is above the chain of command. (This is a lot different from defending yourselves against a violent mob out to bust your skulls). This was crafted as such as to prevent the chain of command to be subverted to be blind obedience.
    The decisions of these officers to withdraw their support did not just come out of the blue like they just woke up one day and said “hmmmm, I think I’ll withdraw my support today.” All these issues were discussed, debated, and if you know about military intel these guys had had them – they know the truth. You don’t wait for the supreme court to tell you this is wrong or this is immoral – you know, they did, all the intel was right in front of them. Put yourself in their shoes and choose, to defend the constitution (I know something there says something about election rigging) or follow the chain of command blindly. The chaos that you’re referring to refers to combat situations wherein the unit crumbles if orders are not followed like “take cover!” and these guys go “what for?” and get shot in the heads. These are professional soldiers, men with integrity, their men look up to them, respect them, and would follow them to their deaths if need be. That alone should speak volumes about the credibility of these officers. Then again if we hide behind legality, this is a foregone conclusion, your line of argument will justify the perpetuation of corruption and despotism cleverly rationalized by people who can use the law to their selfish ends. This was a judgment call, one that meant career suicide on one end and debasing your integrity on the other, they chose the former. I don’t know about you but this was not the glorious end I had in mind for these soldiers who risked their lives for us, they deserve better. You and I may hide in the gray areas of legality but can you turn a blind eye to the truth just because nobody told you that its wrong?

  • ramrod said:

    hey, my response to bencard just got “awaiting moderation” stuff

  • pete said:

    bencard: “but he should cease being a “soldier” of a nation and must surrender his weapons first.”

    Resignation? Soldiers resigning en-masse? How about soldiers going on a mass leave?

    Civilians can sympathize by going on leave. If the critical mass is reached, it’s a general strike! Soldiers and civilians unite by going on synchronized mass leave. If GMA won’t resign nor go on a leave of absence then why don’t the soldiers and the people do it?

    Tell the soldiers to resign before they question? The thing is the soldiers were accepted into the service because they sacrificed and worked hard, they earned it. No question about that. But there are big, serious questions about how GMA got to be the commander-in-chief who then appointed a bunch of GMA generals embedded in the chain of command.

    “GMA is legit until her SC tells otherwise. If you can’t accept that fact, get the f_ck out of here!” Sir, bencard, sir, tell that to the marines!

  • ramrod said:

    Bencard,

    My first attempt to respond was moderated, I’ll try this one.

    The first pledge in the soldier’s code of conduct is tho defend the constitution, following the chain of command is only 3rd.

    You don’t need to wait for the supreme court to tell you that shooting innocent civilians is against the constitution and this is above the chain of command. (This is a lot different from defending yourselves against a violent mob out to bust your skulls). This was crafted as such as to prevent the chain of command to be subverted to be blind obedience.
    The decisions of these officers to withdraw their support did not just come out of the blue like they just woke up one day and said “hmmmm, I think I’ll withdraw my support today.” All these issues were discussed, debated, and if you know about military intel these guys had had them – they know the truth. You don’t wait for the supreme court to tell you this is wrong or this is immoral – you know, they did, all the intel was right in front of them. Put yourself in their shoes and choose, to defend the constitution (I know something there says something about election rigging) or follow the chain of command blindly. The chaos that you’re referring to refers to combat situations wherein the unit crumbles if orders are not followed like “take cover!” and these guys go “what for?” and get shot in the heads. These are professional soldiers, men with integrity, their men look up to them, respect them, and would follow them to their deaths if need be. That alone should speak volumes about the credibility of these officers. Then again if we hide behind legality, this is a foregone conclusion, your line of argument will justify the perpetuation of corruption and despotism cleverly rationalized by people who can use the law to their selfish ends. This was a judgment call, one that meant career suicide on one end and debasing your integrity on the other, they chose the former. I don’t know about you but this was not the glorious end I had in mind for these soldiers who risked their lives for us, they deserve better. You and I may hide in the gray areas of legality but can you turn a blind eye to the truth just because nobody told you that its wrong?

  • ramrod said:

    mbw

    my response to bencard just got “awaiting moderation” whats this?

  • ramrod said:

    Bencard,

    Even with following orders, these are operationally defined as “legal orders and decrees” by my lawful superiors…

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Excellent Ramrod!

    People must be aware that a military officer worth his salt is expected to issue only LEGAL ORDERS and every soldier worth his salt has the right to DISOBEY ILLEGAL ORDERS.

  • ramrod said:

    “Some may not grasp the gravity and ramifications of this thing especially with regards to physician-patient relationship, the complete trust, the integrity and expertise which if altered in some way may result to irreparable damage on patients, loss of lives and maybe lawsuits. This is specially true in cases in the ER, SICU,CCU,ICU and in numerous instances where minutes and even seconds count during medical decision making This may not affect us, old timer FMGs since our practice is already well established. However, we are thinking of the newbies, those who have just finished their training and those future FMG colleagues fresh from 747.” -pilipinoparin

    You know, this issue would not have been noticed by anyone outside the demographics of the target viewers of this show until some reactionaries over reacted and made it into a global concern. Now everybody from Timbukto to Gnome, Alaska will ask “What, they don’t have good medical schools in the Philippines?” and then start to speculate. Someone punctured a “can of worms” but these guys did the whole Philippine medical profession a disfavor by “prying” open very wide the same can and spilling the worms all over the place!

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    “The chaos that you’re referring to refers to combat situations wherein the unit crumbles if orders are not followed like “take cover!” and these guys go “what for?” and get shot in the heads.”

    Funny! That’s similar to my husband’s comment when I read a portion of Bencard’s post… husband continues: “But if I order my lieutenant to give orders to shoot to kill a group of rallyists, he can refuse the order because it’s illegal.” Full stop!

  • pete said:

    ramrod,

    Soldiers were used in electoral fraud. Before the 2004 elections, a soldier told me personally that they were given specific instructions on what to do with the ballot boxes. He knew and admitted that it was cheating but followed the instructions any way.

    In this instance alone, clearly, the code of conduct is dysfunctional. An illegal order was given and obeyed. This instances are wide-spread and from top to bottom.

    The code of survival instead of honor is at work among the soldiers. Starting with the top officers.

    Too few good soldiers still adhere to the code and they are now in jail.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    brian, lots of writers have taught in unis without degrees.

  • ramrod said:

    “Ram I take one-month off each year to travel. Sure Zuellig is one of those Pharma Companies that’s very much against the passing of the CHEAPER MEDICINES BILL. Pharma business in the Philippines is a very lucrative endeavor indeed. It means lots and lots of $$$$$$$.”-karah

    You get your full value for money with “branded” medicines, the price has to cover the costs of research, production, distribution (basically fixed and variable). The results/products of all this costly research made by the likes of Glaxo, Smithkline, Bayer, etc. patent protection has a specific number of years only, after that this formulation is fair game to every laboratory that can copy these drugs or basically the active ingredient. If and when these generic copies have actually undergone the same tests, envivo or en vitro on laboratory animals, etc. to determine efficacy and important things like contraindications and side effects and must not be used in conjunctions with this and this drug is anybody’s guess – hence the significant difference in price. In India, where its always mentioned that the medicines of the same brand or generic are extremely cheaper than the ones sold here – of course, India is one of the worst patent violators. If you look at this country, healthcare is also a major issue? So if you hear people saying that our healthcare problems can be solved by cheap drugs beware – you might be taking placebos…

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    Re: my response to bencard just got “awaiting moderation” whats this?”

    Told y’all earlier, Mlq3′s minesweeper is at work – and considering it’s the Vigilance class circa 40s, takes time!

  • ramrod said:

    Oh, I sure wish they worked on Harry’s recent comments.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Agree: “So if you hear people saying that our healthcare problems can be solved by cheap drugs beware – you might be taking placebos…”

    There’s been a crackdown going on against fake medicines everywhere being sold on the internet, etc.

  • Bencard said:

    mbw, suit yourself, but i thought we are talking about a nation governed by a CIVILIZED constitution (specifically, the Philippines), not a chaotic society such as pol pots cambodia, saddam’s iraq, or present-day darfur. unarmed civilians of any age have been known to perish as “collateral damage” in large-scale armed confrontation, or in so-called “ethnic cleansing” massacres. some protagonists claim justification for the killings by showing that “innocent” civilians are not really innocent at all, or are being used as “shields” by the enemy in order for them to have some measure of impunity while engaged in their own atrocities. in the latter case, the soldier is faced with the ultimate dilemma of self-preservation and killing the enemy along with their human shield. such is the evil of war.

    but the bone of contention that i have raised here is whether a soldier, on his own, can decide what is and what is not legal, and then act according to his belief in disregard of lawful orders of his superiors. i contend that he cannot. i further contend that, strictly within the confines of the barracks, there is no such thing as democracy (as in government of, for, and by, the soldiers), as we know it outside.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    karah, i used to spend time in davao in my late teens and early 20s, and dole had an interesting system going with the growing of bananas. they had contracts with growers, it pointed to a way economies of scale could be achieved even with small holdings. the environmental part, though, was very controversial because of all those plastic bags with chemicals and chemical sprays required to produce unblemished bananas for the japanese market.

    in san carlos, negros occ. about 2 years ago also had some interesting conversations with people with small holdings making very good money growing rhubarb of all things.

    also the cut flowers industry was, at least in the 90s, something that had good prospects.

  • Bencard said:

    pete, ramrod, i didn’t see your posts until i finished my last one to mwb. consider it my response to yours.

  • cvj said:

    Ramrod, i share MBW’s assessment of your response (at 12:56am) to Bencard so i took the liberty of posting it in my blog.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Re:” mbw, suit yourself, but i thought we are talking about a nation governed by a CIVILIZED constitutions”

    So did I Bencard. I too was thinking of civilized constitutions where illegal orders may be disobeyed.

    I think Ramrod has explained in detail and at legnth and very well the whens and the wherefores of military orders being obeyed blindly as well as the whens and wherefores military orders under operation are deemed illegal.

    I’ll take it a plane higher if you don’t mind: The Trial of Nuremberg. German officers were tried for NOT REFUSING TO DISOBEY higher command to slay and kill millions of Jews.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencard,

    Didn’t read the second paragraph of your post:

    “but the bone of contention that i have raised here is whether a soldier, on his own, can decide what is and what is not legal, and then act according to his belief in disregard of lawful orders of his superiors. i contend that he cannot.”

    In principle, all orders issued by an officer is deemed legal because all military orders issued by any officer are deemed to be LEGAL & LAWFUL. So, in line with that absolute military principle, what you raised here that “on a soldier’s own cannot decide on what is legal and is not legal.”

    However, I must repeat that this principle is only valid because it is ON THE BASIS OF A LEGAL OR LAWFUL ORDER.

    But if a superior’s order is clearly ILLEGAL OR UNLAWFUL, a soldier has the absolute right to disobey the said order.

    Example of illegal or unlawful military order even in time of war: To enter a house and shoot the sleeping children in it.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencard,

    I do believe that the Trial of Nuremberg answers best the questions and debate over when a military order is legal and when it is not.

  • ramrod said:

    “but the bone of contention that i have raised here is whether a soldier, on his own, can decide what is and what is not legal, and then act according to his belief in disregard of lawful orders of his superiors. i contend that he cannot.” – bencard

    This issue was discussed as early as ’87, Fort del Pilar, Baguio City attended by the whole cadet corps, Gen. Biazon was the superintendent then, the guest speakers were Gringo Honasan and Red Capunan. The year after EDSA 1. The decision to follow or not to follow legal orders do not normally fall on the non-enlisted and enlisted men, the burden of responsibility lie in the officer corps. Supposedly, unknown to most, there is an even more powerful law that every officer especially PMAers adhere to because they will have to “trust” each other with their lives and that is the Honor Code. Its just a bunch of nice words like “We the cadets do not lie, cheat, steal, nor TOLERATE OTHERS WHO DO SO.” And then comes another bunch of even nicer words like “Do I intend to deceive?” “Do I intend to take undue advantage?” If the answer to both questions is no, then you are doing the honorable thing. The barracks, especially officers corps one is not democratic as we know it, it might even look like its dictatorial, but its something else, its a place of honor where men do what they say and say what they do. This is supposed to be what makes them the “cream of the Filipino youth as cadets” and the final bastion of honor. There is something that should be more powerful than sheer
    “legalism” and that is honor…Those that violate this code of honor are normally “ostracized” to the point that they leave dishonorably…

  • Bencard said:

    mbw, i have no quarrel with your “on the basis of a legal or lawful order”. i still contend that its not for a soldier to say what is and what is not “legal” and “lawful” under our constitutional scheme.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencard,

    Ramrod says right: “The decision to follow or not to follow legal orders do not normally fall on the non-enlisted and enlisted men, the burden of responsibility lie in THE OFFICERS CORPS.”

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    But Bencard, you are stretching it very far but without being specific, hate to say statement is wooly:

    “still contend that its not for a soldier to say what is and what is not “legal” and “lawful” under our constitutional scheme.”

    What do you mean by under “our constitutional scheme?”

    If you are talking about following the chain of command, this “scheme” is the scheme in every civilized country in the world, Bencard.

    But it comes to the cruch, an officer should an must refuse an illegal order or suffer standing trial (example My Lai Massacre.)

  • ramrod said:

    Now, in the case of Esperon, he was confronted by these officers with this code, even Reyes. The challenge is “Is this alright?” When someone within the officer corps asks you this you are morally bound by everything you deem as holy, your very existence as a soldier depends on it – to answer the truth because as I said, these people have to be able to trust each other with their lives (never mind us). It is an agreement, a covenant, a law owned solely by the corps precisely to supposedly make them different from us ordinary mortals.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    That’s very similar to UK Royal Naval College tenet of cadetship.

    ““We the cadets do not lie, cheat, steal, nor TOLERATE OTHERS WHO DO SO…Those that violate this code of honor are normally “ostracized” to the point that they leave dishonorably…”

  • ramrod said:

    At any rate, the powers that be have the upperhand at the moment, but I believe eventually the truth will come out. I don’t blame Bencard, from what the public has been bombarded with its an extremely difficult point to make. These officers were imprisoned for stating their position bravely, out in the open, (they could have easily organized another coup) – but in their naivity believed in democracy. Did they go up in arms against the government that they in all honesty believe and know is illegitimate? No. If they’re statement in front of the media of “withdrawal of support” earned them this sentence I hate to see what will happen to us if they read what we had to say about GMA.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ramrod,

    “At any rate, the powers that be have the upperhand at the moment, ”

    True. There’s always that very delicate ground when people believe they are right because they won or they’re on top and it may even follow that they are legally right but it doesn’t mean that having the upperhand means that they’ve done what is morally right.

    That’s why I truly appreciate the incarcerated officers led by Brig Gen Danny Lim – these officers, some of Philippines’ best of the best because they chose to uphold integrity.

  • Bencard said:

    ramrod, in a “government of laws and not of men”, “legalism” is a way of life. we cannot avoid it if we want to adhere to the “rule of law”, the great equalizer. it amazes me how some people can dismiss legality or legalism as some kind of a dirty word. without denigrating the idea of “honor” by any means, i think the concept is objective rather than subjective, relative rather than absolute. 99.9% of the entire population of the country saying that plunder is “honorable” does not make it so. by the same token, 99.9% of the entire armed forces believing that the government is “illegitimate” does not make its order illegal, and therefore dishonorable (making its violation an act of “honor”).

    the time when the armed forces can decide what the law is, is the time we are ruled by by a military cabal or junta.

  • ramrod said:

    I’m guessing the Burmese military officers are also in a quandary, but you know if they had a “code” of some sorts that pertains to honor – some officers would have already decided what to do or are doing something about it already.

  • Bencard said:

    mwb, the last i looked at our constitution, the interpretation of its provisions, as well as statutes, is lodged with the judiciary with the sc., the final arbiter.
    that is our “constitutional scheme”. if you think that’s “wooly” (whatever that means), don’t blame me. i only abide by it, not the author of it.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencard,

    I totally agree with you: “ramrod, in a “government of laws and not of men”, “legalism” is a way of life. we cannot avoid it if we want to adhere to the “rule of law”, the great equalizer.”

    Where we might differ is on the absolute principle that a military officer has the right to refuse to follow an illegal or unlawful order because the officer believes the order is illegal and unlawful. I say he/she has while you say in effect that an officer must obey all orders, illegal or not.

  • ramrod said:

    Bencard,

    I see your point now. You believe that the current administration is legitimate. You believe that Esperon is doing the legal thing, that he is saying the truth. For all intents and purposes the law is on his side as it is “legally” definable. Because all the paperwork says it is. Indulge us, think of this “what if its not?” “What if Esperon is lying, and he and his ilk were used or were accesory to this illegal act?”
    As I was saying they had the “intel,” the people involved aleady talked, you can’t possibly hide all this especially within the officer corps, its a very tight knit, not to mention, small society. Of course you’ll say unless the supreme court will say otherwise you will stand by GMA and Esperon. Truth will eventually come out and these guys will be vindicated. Until then you will continue to be amazed in how legalism can be considered a bad word. Lawyers spend their whole careers looking for loopholes in the law, what you may consider “legal” these people can make “illegal.” Of course “legalism” is relative, if its not you’ll be putting battalions of lawyers out of business. “Honor” on the other hand is a universal principle, it cannot be defined any other way, you cannot break it, you only break yourself against it.

  • Bencard said:

    ramrod, i have debated this issue extensively with a number of worthy contrarians in this blog, e.g, mlq3, mb, cvj, abe, (even benignO, the blogger many love to hate – figuratively, of course), among others. it is my view that in every civilized human society, the only acceptable “truth” is legal truth as determined by the rules of evidence. anything else is conjecture or speculation. there are lawyers who try to find loopholes and there are lawyers who try to plug those loopholes or convince the court that they don’t apply. it’s an adversarial thing and the ultimate objective is to find the “legal truth”.

    btw, who is the omnipotent, all-knowing person who determines and defines what “honor” consists of?

  • ramrod said:

    bencard,

    Good that you finally put your truth in context “legal truth,” as determined by the “rules of evidence.” This only means to say that your concept of “truth” is something that can be manipulated, so long as you can show evidence, but sad to say evidence can be manufactured. So in effect, you are willing to close your eyes to the “truth” even if you know its true as long as there are no “evidence” to say otherwise, that is “legalism.”
    As to the concept of honor, it is listed among the universal principles, check out Stephen Covey. You are either honorable or dishonorable, like truth – it should only be true or untrue (based on its essence) not “legally true.” I am not the person to argue as I am not basically confrontational and I will admit you’re out of my league. I’m just someone who calls a spade a spade, not half a spade because its handle is broken or something. To say that something is not true because it is not “legally true” is an admission that you can get away with anything as long as you make it appear legal…That my friend is the expertise of this administration…

  • Bencard said:

    ramrod, not to belabor the point but legal truth is the result of human truth, which by its nature, is far from perfection. thus, you’re right, its subject to manipulation or fabrication. the rules of evidence provide safeguards against manufactured evidence or perjured testimonies. our law has its ways to ferret out the truth and to keep falsehood out. most of the time, it succeeds but every now and then, it fails as is true in every human endeavor.

    we are not, and cannot, talk of divine truth. it would be the height of presumptuousness to claim that one has a handle on such kind of truth. not the courts, the media or even the clergy. hence, i take exception from your claim that i am “willing to close (my) eyes to the “truth”. its beyond the realm of my senses and understanding, and i am not about to make any “judgment” with respect to it. i’ll just stick to what my own faculty can comprehend.

    you probably know, as well as i, that there is a code of “honor” within the mafia, the knights templar, even the fictional “spectre”of the james bond notoriety. have you heard the saying: “there’s a code of honor among thieves” or something to that effect?

  • pete said:

    bencard, ramrod,mbw

    Col. Orlando de Leon: The Officer Who Said No

    By his gesture, however, de Leon, a member of PMA Class 1982, has shown the public that the country’s armed services do have officers who know how to just say no. Of course, there had been others before him, like the late Army Capt. Rene Jarque, a staunch reformist but who had to leave his career in 1998 disillusioned by the unchecked corruption in the military he had exposed.

    More recently, there were Brig. Gen. Francisco Gudani (now retired), and Col. Alexander Balutan, both also from the Marines, who defied a presidential order against military officers appearing before congressional inquiries when they testified before the Senate last year on allegations of widespread cheating during the 2004 elections.

    http://www.sundalo.bravehost.com/Col.%20Orlando%20de%20Leon.htm

  • pete said:

    bencard: “there’s a code of honor among thieves” or something to that effect?

    That’s GMA’s code of honor. Neri’s invocation of executive prevelege is a current example and many others before as in above Gen Gudani’s refusal to follow eo464 …

    You can get away with legalism on isolated individual cases but not when the PATTERN of behaviour by perpetrators are clearly established.

  • pete said:

    This “code of honor among thieves” has cultivated a culture of impunity that pervades in GMA’s regime. A UN emmissary calls it “official impunity”.

  • pete said:

    That means the rule of law is dysfunctional primarily because top officals, starting with GMA, themselves violate the law. Bencard is advocating the right priciple of rule of law , unwittingly, to protect the law breakers.

  • pete said:

    in other words, bencard, is right in advocating rule of law but he is obviously wrong in assuming that rule of law under GMA is rule of law as he thinks it should be.

  • Bencard said:

    pete, i only mention the “code of honor among thieves” in response to ramrod’s implication that honor is absolutely and universally good.

    your claim that GMA is a thief is your own personal judgment, along with that of other like-minded individuals. for purposes of this discussion about “truth”, your argument is out of place unless you can show at least the “legal truth” of what you are claiming.

  • indoro ni emilie said:

    “it amazes me how some people can dismiss legality or legalism as some kind of a dirty word.”

    paraphrasing shakespeare:
    to make clean the word again, cleanse the system of lawyers.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    Pilipinoparin, feel free to copy and paste (or link the post). if it would help in your discussions, why not?

    yeah I’m a PT, and would have felt even more insulted with that Desperate Housewive’s remark than other non-medical professionals, don’t you think? and yet i’m not. simply bec. I know in my heart my school (or me) do not belong to those being made fun of in the show.

    think of this analogy: insecure people are quick to anger at any imagined faults, while secure people will just laugh off jokes made at their expense.

    it’s like what ramrod pointed out. over reaction has made the remark reach a wider audience than it would have had the remark just been laughed off.

    another analogy: sino ang mas masayang tuksuhin, ang pikon o ang di pikon?

    crying foul at the remark and saying it destroys our medical professionals’ integrity doesn’t cut. first of all, newbies, whom you say will be the ones most affected, can just point this out to doubters out there: ok fine. you have a valid doubt. i did come from a med school in the phils and they have a reputation that isn’t really good. i give you that. but here’s my license. it’s issued by your country. with a licensure exam given by your country. here’s my visascreen. a certification by an independent body mandated by your country to check that foreign medical practitioners who will work in your country have the education equal to the standards of education set in your country.

    if you’re ready to doubt these things, then you may as well doubt our American counterparts for they sure go through these same licensures, are issued licenses by the same collegiate body, and their educational credentials don’t even have to go through the rigid review of CGFNS. a plus or minus, depending on your POV.

  • ramrod said:

    bencard,

    Please review everything that you’ve read in your whole lifetime, it says “there is no honor among thieves!”
    There is nothing “divine” about the essence of honor or truth, its basically honorable or dihonorable, true or untrue, the door is open or close (not half close). Its taught in basic philisophy, look up “essence.” Your line of argument is good for argument’s sake. You could even argue that you don’t have a nose in front of your face, just as long as you can “legally” define it like you can’t see it so it must not be there, etc. What we have here are “gentlemen” who at some point in their lives agreed among themselves to call a spade a spade no bullshitting – they meet again find out that one of them violated this agreement and called him out. This so called honor code was made precisely because they refuse to be thieves and made a built in mechanism to check each other. Why is this hard for you to accept? If you analyze a particular situation you have to understand a lot of things, their culture, their beliefs, their attitudinal system, then you can possibly hazard a guess to their motives. Biazon, though he cannot say it out loud because he is a gentlemen can only give us hints like “there must be something there.”
    You’re arguing for the sake of arguing. Scientists can say that a bumblebee cannot fly, its body is not “aerodynamically sound, its wing design do not allow for substantial lift, etc. The scientists know this, you know this, but the bumblebee doesn’t, he just flaps his wings for all he’s worth (xxx beats per second) so whala! “We have a lift off!”
    I will respect your views. But then again, if you insist on qualifying the “truth” in any way other than its essence…you cannot be trusted…

  • hvrds said:

    Moral Hazard and what the world must do about Myanmar/Burma. Asean economies – Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore and with India and China are doing strategic business with Myanmar.

    Thailand is Myanmar’s biggest trading partner. 20% of Thailand’s power utilities are powered with natural gas from Myanmar. Thailand and China are in the process of agreements to build pipelines for oil and gas through Myanmar and Thailand to China for Middle East oil and gas.
    Kindly review the map of the world as to where the biggest bulk of the oil and gas reserves lie.

    The Asian/Russian mainland lies from the Pacific side to Turkey. Indo-Europe, Middle East and Indo-China are the upcoming fulcrum of the future of the carbon based economy of the world. The Anglo Saxon empire with the Europeans behind them have a strategic problem – India and China. The productive capacities of these two economies will dwarf anything the West can offer. The gap is primarily in technology.(Human Creative Ability)) The dollar hegemony has helped the U.S. maintain its lead but that utilization of financial technology under the authority of empire (fiat international currency) is under extreme stress.

    If you want to look at the hypocrisy of the U.S. stand in Myanmar just look at the U.S. support of the dictators in Azerbaijan and Central Asia. Oil and gas from the Caspian sea and Central Asia the “democratic” equalizer.

    Big Mike and GMA should counsel the generals about the value of PR. ( “Democracy 101″)Abalos should be sent there to teach them the mechanics of elections. They should have nothing to fear about elections after Abalos gives them the model to follow. Big Mike and GMA can also inform them of the Pork Barrel method of governance. Carmen Pedrosa and her husband would be a big help also. Get FVR involved there as he can show the generals the way they can rule keep their handle on economic power.

    Tiananmen Square shoot outs on CNN are bad PR. Send Esperon and company there to teach them low intensity methods to deal with dissent. Away from cameras.People who disappear can be believed to have been abducted by beings from outer space. No physical evidence. When you shoot down people demonstrating in front of cameras, that was perfectly acceptable during past times.

    GMA should send her national security advisers to Myanmar to teach them ways to stifle dissent away from the cameras. The old kill the chicken to frighten the monkeys approach. Send also PR communicators and start giving licenses for media. I think the Wowwowee model of circus and bread would be quite beneficial.

    Though Myanmar is primarily agricultural there are restive people in the capital since the generals forgot that when you make it hard for people to eat then even the monks do not eat. They live on handouts. Social stability requires at least some food to survive on.

    Can the people of Thailand impose sanctions on Myanmar and stop importing the natural gas and sacrifice their standard of living? Not likely. Will Singapore and Malaysia get involved in the internal politics of Myanmar?

    There is no doubt that the generals are living off the hardships of their people. Someone should translate the history of the French revolution to these guys. People need food to eat in an urban setting.

    The Philippines is fortunate that the empire created an infrastructure for learning in this country that gave schooling and training for a lot of Filipinos. The Spaniards and the Catholic school system also helped. But that schooling and training was for a first world economy.

    That economic system and structure does not exist in the country.

    I think GMA could also ask the World Bank to get involved in Myanmar. Follow the Philippine example. Get Shell, Chevron and Exxon Mobile involved.

    While in India GMA should have asked Manmohan Singh how come the government runs huge budget deficits and at the same time has a better credit rating than the Philippines?

    Singh is a practicing equilibrium economist with a socialist bent and is in coalition government with a Communist party.

    Siddhartha Gautama (The Buddha)is originally from Nepal.

    It is a complex problem but one that will be resolved mainly because the generals will learn about communication. The next step for the U.S. and the U.K. is to organize an armed insurrection. Start it from the Indian portion of the border. Import some Maoist fighters from Nepal.

  • ramrod said:

    “pete, i only mention the “code of honor among thieves” in response to ramrod’s implication that honor is absolutely and universally good.” – bencard

    Please search your soul? Honor is a universal principle. By that I mean it can stand by itself and still retain its essence, its meaning. Honor and thievery are two extremely different things, they cannot merge with each other, its the difference between light and darkness, they cannot exist together. Thieves will never be honorable because they do what they do away from sight, precisely because they themselves know what they’re doing is wrong, but they argue that unless they are nit “legally” proven wrong its okay. Honorable men can do what they do in plain sight, because they have nothing to hide, or have you forgotten the concept of transparency also?

  • ramrod said:

    hvrds,

    The scenario you’re painting is a scary albeit a “doable” one considering the mentioned parties.

  • ramrod said:

    “I think GMA could also ask the World Bank to get involved in Myanmar. Follow the Philippine example. Get Shell, Chevron and Exxon Mobile involved.”

    hrvds, I believe Exxon has been operating in Myanmar already re natural gas. Its one of the companies that in effect is financing the junta.

  • cvj said:

    Pete, i clicked through the link you provided. The site is mostly agreeable but read through this proposal and see if you agree:

    http://www.sundalo.bravehost.com/The%20New%20Order.htm

    I don’t, most especially this part:

    “Media releases should be limited to responsible news reporting and positive commentaries.”

    How different is that from the current administration line?

  • pete said:

    cvj,

    I’m with you on these concerns. It’s not a matter of drawing the line on the militatry’s role in politics but implanting in them the faith necessary to make democracy work and work its way through seemingly chaotic and disordered situations which are stages or part and parcel of what democracy is.

  • pete said:

    Rigidity sets in when details of reform supercedes the manner of reform. I believe that the means determine the ends. Militaristic means can only establish a rigid and undemocratic society.

    btw, to keep the beurocracy from being militarized due to appointment or election into public office of retired and resigned soldiers specially top officers, I suggest that a law be passed requiring an interignum before they are appointed or are allowed to run as candidates in an election. The higher the rank the longer the interignum. 5 star generals, 5 years; 4 star, 4 years and so on down the line. How many ex-generals now occupy civilians posts in GMA’s admin? One big signifant reason why military is politicized. Leandro Mendoza is incompetent for his post. Angelo Reyes is a terrible example of an asshole general. pardon the word but that’s how he really has behaved.

  • pete said:

    bencard,

    “show at least the ‘legal truth’ of what you are claiming.”

    Trillanes came to mind as my quick answer to your challenge. Trillanes had openly declared that GMA is a thief and a cheat. Now he is legally a senator. His accusations against GMA were affirmed by millions of legal voters. He represents the ‘legal truth’ that you are asking for but is so difficult to uncover in GMA’s regime. Brave men try at the risk of being killed, kidnapped or at the very least imprisoned. Your ‘legal truth’ is imprisoned inside a top-security cell inside a military camp.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencacrd,

    Agree with Ramrod quote is usually “There’s NO honour among thieves” or there’s honour sometimes among thieves (at least in Britain).

    Mlq3,

    Dumbo me! BRP Quezon is a she and not ‘it’. (What struck me was they simply wrote BRP Quezon and not BRP MANUEL Quezon or BRP Pres Manuel Quezon either one should be the complete name of the ship officially; anyway, just a detail, maybe the sailor in charge of keeping the website was lazy?)

  • bibeth said:

    karah,

    have you been blogging until the wee hours of the morning again?

    That explains your eyebags…

    Note: Cucumber won’t help

  • bibeth said:

    Burma, like many other countries continue to suffer from oppresive rulers because of one thing: Nobody cares to do anything.

    There have been massive condemnation of the way the Burmese junta runs the country.

    But condemnation not coupled with action is USELESS.

    “the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men not to do anything”

    We can post all sorts of websites and blogs to FREE BURMA, but unfortunately, we are talking in a language the Burmese junta can and will not understand.

  • ramrod said:

    Free Burma!

  • ramrod said:

    Bencard,

    Some reading materials, please try to read something at least once a day (or more), its a remedy to an extremely debilitating disease called “ignorance.”

    Leading the Righteous Way

    The demands of the Honor System are simple. We are not to lie, to cheat, to steal and to take advantage of others.

    However, the Honor System is not only to govern our behavior as cadets in order to level the playing field in our academics. The Honor System and its Code is designed to inculcate in us the leadership qualities needed by our nation. The Honor System is to govern us even outside the limits of Fort Del Pilar and in our daily private and official lives.

    In the Academy, we are trained to be leaders. As cadets, we all aspired to eventually become deserving generals. That is to be expected. And to be one, we had to strive and improve in our profession in order to deserve our promotions. Expectedly, each one of us strove to excel in our respective fields of operations.

    We were then truly apolitical. The people had faith that the Armed Services can be neutral in the political exercises. There was then also the assurance that elections can be undertaken without fraud if the military kept watch over the process.

    I believe that every graduate of the Academy can rightfully aspire to become the Chief of Staff or Chief of the Philippine National Police but we must accept the fact that not all of us can attain that ambition. There was a time when promotions and assignments to important positions were primarily based on competence.

    Those days are obviously gone. Since the martial law days, the common perception is that the process involved in the promotions and assignments of officers, particularly among the higher ranks, has become politicized. I am truly aware as you are, that promotions and assignments obtained through political connections involve quid pro quos.

    Promotions to higher ranks and positions are perceived to be no longer necessarily dictated by competence and dedication to duty. The recent spate of restiveness among our junior officers is obviously caused by this perception and reality. The politicization of the military remains unabated these days. The term ‘an apolitical military’ has become fiction. A lie.

    There was the time when the word of an officer, especially of a PMA graduate, was taken at face value. There was integrity. PMA graduates were entrusted with positions of trust. We were truthful to our friends. Deception was reserved against our enemies.

    However, in these trying times, lying is pervasive and practiced even against our people who deserve to know the Truth. These days, those who hold positions of trust, especially those who handle financial matters, are no longer thought to be worthy of faith and trust. There will always be suspicion that something anomalous goes on, especially those whose lifestyles do not reasonably match the pay scales of their ranks. The temptations of ‘conversion’ have sapped the moral strength of some of our officers. Integrity in PMA graduates seems to have become another fiction.

    The recent exposes on the crimes of some of the alumni of the PMA who deviated from the Honor System alert us to the immoral virus contaminating our Armed Services. I am sure there are still others who will be uncovered and must be purged from our Association. We seem to be in a regime where stealing public funds, lying and cheating have become the acceptable norm for one to succeed. Mistrust is tearing our nation into small pieces.

    The real meaning of Loyalty in our PMA motto is lost. Loyalty is no longer given to the institution or to the country, but given to ambitious persons with doubtful motives and self-interest. Loyalty to principles among some PMA graduates has become fiction. Ostracism seems to be reserved against the idealists and not against those who stray from the Righteous Path.

    Are we to allow the degeneration of morals in our professional corps of officers to continue? We are now under the spotlight of shame. The point is reached that when a crime is unearthed in the Armed Services, the question is asked: ‘Is he a PMAyer?’

    You may be distressed by the dismal picture of our moral state of affairs I have given. Nevertheless, I consider it my duty to do so. I need to do it. As Rizal once said, the cancer of society must be presented to the public in order that appropriate cures may be obtained.

    What is to be done?

    Although we, who are already retired, can no longer directly take action in reforming the Armed Services, we must nevertheless, exercise our moral suasion to insist on the urgent and necessary institutional changes for the good of our society and of the nation. We owe our young and idealistic officers our moral effort, support and example.

    We must not disappoint them.

    Now is the time to breathe new life into the Honor System and restore the PMA alumni to the high esteem of society.

    Now is the time to revive and strengthen the righteous spirit of Courage, Loyalty and Integrity among all alumni and members of this Association. Otherwise, the future for those who will come after us will be in doubt. In the dark.

    Leading the Righteous Way is the imperative for all of us.

    The Cavaliers,
    The PMA Alumni Association
    February 2006

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Hi Ramrod,

    Thanks for publishing the PMA AA’s statement:

    While the statement on the whole calls for a revival of the honour system, it equally confirms the widespread belief that AFP leadership today is dishonest. We may all try to read between the lines and insist that they have a different meaning but really, however we try to modify, the message can’t be changed – the AFP leadership is on the dock.

    This one here is particularly telling:

    “The recent exposes on the crimes of some of the alumni of the PMA who deviated from the Honor System alert us to the immoral virus contaminating our Armed Services. I am sure there are still others who will be uncovered and must be purged from our Association. We seem to be in a regime where stealing public funds, lying and cheating have become the acceptable norm for one to succeed. Mistrust is tearing our nation into small pieces.”

  • ramrod said:

    mbw,

    I agree, I saw this happening even 20 years ago. You know the feeling of “disillusionment?” A long time ago in another life I was part of them. Although I have no regrets leaving and starting a different career, sometimes I ask myself if I could have helped.

  • cvj said:

    Pete, thanks for that. I can understand why the idealistic elements in the military, similar to their idealistic counterparts in the Left would want an undemocratic ‘transition period’. However, if they are to start a genuine peaceful revolution, they have to get the people into the act and for that, you need democracy in the truest sense of the word.

  • Bencard said:

    ramrod, you can believe what you want, and it doesn’t bother me one bit if you think i cannot be trusted because of my opposing point of view.

    in this finite world we live in, “truth” is what the human mind can comprehend as such, no more no less. there is no standard of truth usable to, or used by, man than what could only be ascertained and derived from rules gradually established through experience and experimentation in the course of its history. no wise man or group of wise men, dead or alive, can proclaim real truth (as opposed to legal truth) with finality. what is perceived through the senses may or may not be true. intellect is flawed, one way or the other, so not absolutely reliable. a “close” door is factually close only as far as the person who sees it is concerned, not to a person who is only told that it is close. but suppose the person who “sees” it has seriously impaired vision and that what he sees is not really what it seems to be? would his testimony be reliable as “truth”?

    i don’t know what you exactly mean by “essence”. as i understand it, the word could mean “the nature of ” or “attribute” (as in a derivative substance retaining some attribute of the product it was derived from). in this context, perhaps i could say, legal truth is an “essence” of truth (whatever that is).

    honor is a positive reputation accorded a person by his peers. it is earned and given, not born into, grabbed, bought, or stolen. like i said, the mafia (or cosa nostra) has a code of honor, violation of which could mean death to the violator. a gang of assassins can have a code that honors, perhaps, the member who perpetrates the greatest number of assassinations in a given year. a club with dishonorable objectives can have an honor system within its membership.

    btw, one eminent scientist (i think Carl Sagan)once said that everything in this world (or universe?) is illusion.

    pete, to paraphrase lincoln, millions of angels swearing that what a lying witness says is true will not transform his lies to truth.

  • ramrod said:

    Bencard,

    The mafia did not have a “code of honor” they had OMERTA, the code of silence.

    “A more famous example of the code of silence is omerta (Italian: omertà, from the Latin: humilitas=humility or modesty), the Mafia code of silence.”

    Thieves cannot have a code of honor because they don’t expect each other to be honorable, on the contrary, it is a generally accepted fact that they “steal from each other.”

  • Bencard said:

    ramrod, call it however or whatever you want, i don’t care. you want to call it (as maybe the rest of the world) “the code of silence” or “omerta”, be my guest. but what makes you, or anyone else outside of the organization, so sure that its members don’t regard it (or call it) the code of honor, and that omerta is just a part of that code. no one, including you, can prevent them from calling their rules of conduct anyway they want, don’t you agree?

    who do you think you are denying thieves the right to set up their own rules of conduct and call it a “code of honor”? they, and only they, can define the “right” conduct that will govern each of their members in relation to the others, and to name it as they please, ain’t that a fact?

  • ramrod said:

    bencard,

    They probably can, but there isn’t, no evidence in history whatsoever, no evidence – ergo in your logic
    “nada.”

  • jaxius said:

    Ramrod,

    I think we’re on the opposite sides of the fence on this one. I think the “Alright” challenge utilized by Sens. Lacson and Honasan was an inordinate use of the Honor Code. It was the wrong place, wrong time, wrong audience.

    The Honor Code, as I understood it, is meant only for the men who swore to live by it and uphold it. Using the challenge in public, in a Senate hearing to say the least, cheapens it in my opinion. What’s next, a public spectacle of an honor trial in PMA? It should have been used only between and among those who swore to abide by it.

    Its use in public bespeaks of unbridled arrogance. Its not simple arrogance or esprit de corps. For military men, pride or simple arrogance is something of an allowed excess. As they say, its “part of the uniform”. That’s why when Sec. Angelo Reyes was challenged by Sen Lacson and he answered “I am already under oath”, I think he answered correctly.

    What were the two senators of Class ’71 trying to say by issuing that challenge? That there is a higher oath that cavaliers follow? Are they saying to their fellow Senators and to the Filipino people “you can’t make tell the truth but I can through this password ‘alright, sir’ which only PMA grads use?” Old Boys Club mentality?

    Second, baka wala nang maniwala nyan sa mga graduate ng PMA hanggang hindi nachachallenge ng “alright, sir?” They’ve basically reduced the Honor Code to a challenge. I think that is precisely the reason why the use of direct questions are discouraged. If you have the goods on someone, then bring him to court or some other tribunal where his indiscretion can be penalized. The Honor Code was not made for use in fishing expeditions.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Coming from Honasan, I thought the ‘Alright’ seemed like a challeng a la OK Coral.

    Coming from Ping Lacson at the time was acceptable. Although I tend to agree with Jaxius that a public challenge once too often might lose its meaning.

  • pete said:

    cvj,

    Thanks, btw, for poitning out that particular post on the sundalos’ blog. Regarding the means and ends of change,
    the espousal of ‘undemocratic transition’ period by idealists on the Left and Right actually puts them on the same side opposite the people they claim to fight for. They use “democracy” to attract support to their causes. Of course once they get to power, even blogs like theirs won’t be allowed.
    The process of democracy is itself an end. The undemocratic means that they espouse can only establish an undemocratic society.

  • pete said:

    ramrod,

    The PMA AA staement is, basically, a critique on the kind of society we have now but without challenging the members to make specific commitments in response to specific issues. It’s not enough to say, ” many PMAer’s have become dis-honorable”. For example, on the issue of ret. generals’ appointment to civilian posts, as i had suggested above:

    “to keep the beurocracy from being militarized due to appointment or election into public office of retired and resigned soldiers specially top officers, I suggest that a law be passed requiring an interignum before they are appointed or are allowed to run as candidates in an election. The higher the rank the longer the interignum. 5 star generals, 5 years; 4 star, 4 years and so on down the line. How many ex-generals now occupy civilians posts in GMA’s admin? One big signifant reason why military is politicized. Leandro Mendoza is incompetent for his post. Angelo Reyes is a terrible example of an asshole general. pardon the word but that’s how he really has behaved.”

    This interignum could be proposed for legislation( Anti-militarization of beurocracy/ Anti-politization of the military Act ?) but it could be violative of the ret generals rights.

    The challenge to PMAers who are committed to reviving the honor code could be a pledge to resist being political appointees or run in an elections within a specific period after getting out of service. Ret Generals now occupying appointive posts can lead the way by resigning. Without the challenge to sacrifice, the PMA AA statement is plain simple rhetoric.

  • Bencard said:

    ramfrod, you don’t make yourself knowledgeable by calling me “ignorant”. prove that you are smart, or well-informed, by what you post here. as far as i can see, there is nothing to show that you are. Being able to quote or copy the full statement of the alumni assoc. of pma, or even its “code of honor”, just doesn’t cut it.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    ramrod, pete, mbw, bencard, et al. the interesting discussion on officers’ codes of honors, the culture that mistahs share, has been the topic of one of the most interesting books i’ve ever read (and a highly one among pma alumni). here’s the book:

    http://www.amazon.com/Closer-Than-Brothers-Philippine-Military/dp/0300077653/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-4514866-9906846?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191726744&sr=8-1

    he looks at two pma classes, that of 1940 and 1971, and explores the pma culture both went through and asks why one class, that of 1940, ended up defending democracy and generally living honorable lives, while the class of 1971 helped implement martial law and gained a reputation for having torturers, etc. in its ranks.

  • ramrod said:

    “What were the two senators of Class ‘71 trying to say by issuing that challenge? That there is a higher oath that cavaliers follow? Are they saying to their fellow Senators and to the Filipino people “you can’t make tell the truth but I can through this password ‘alright, sir’ which only PMA grads use?” Old Boys Club mentality” – Jaxius

    The “Honor Code” is a covenant made by a group of men who swore to tell the truth to each other, regardless of the circumstances, whether in private or in a senate hearing. Yes its “Old Boy’s Club” mentality, I know. Arrogance? It depends on what your beliefs and how much you know of the culture. I understand you may react this way because you cannot relate to it. The idea of an exclusive group of men, the strongest, the smartest, and most combat ready in the land will make anyone squirm with disdain. You may judge, you’re free to do so. But mind you your “freedom” to speak or write your mind you owe partly to generations of sacrifice and blood shed by this “old boy’s club.”
    Whether you like this “old boy’s club” or not, it is still the only venue where courage, loyalty, and integrity are hammered into the minds and hearts of its members and lofty ideals like honor are still regarded as sacred. Can you find a university in the country that during exams the teacher writes all the answers on the board while the students are answer their test papers with bowed heads, eyes focused only on their papers, not even rolling their eyeballs, and after a specified time are told to all answers are on the board check your own papers. These students are fanatic about honor to the point that no one dares, each one is honor bound to report a violation and even the tolerators suffer the same fate?
    The premise is, you all swore to tell the truth at least to each other and reserve deceit for the enemy.
    Yes, the challenge was used in the senate but it was not for you, it was for Reyes. It was a test if Reyes still values the code or lives by the code regardless of the circumstances.
    It is an old boy’s club as you put it, and not everyone can join it. It takes a lot of heart and physical ability.
    People will find it hard to understand, just as you find it hard to understand why some people join fraternities or something similar in nature. But I will fight tooth and nail to defend these people for as long as I can from those who judge them without even knowing them, especially from those who are used to the comfort a safe distance from all forms of danger and cringe at the first sound of gunfire and perhaps hide under a table or bed somewhere.

    MLQ3. Yes I will say its true that hazing and even torture exists in the academy, although I can’ say it still does now. In battle situations, inorder to get the upper hand, “intel” is very important and at times the use of unorthodox means is necessary. You do everything to win. In battle you have to be “more than human” – stronger, more powerful, smarter, and “less than human” – subhuman, you torture, maim, behead, and mutilate your enemies. This is not a profession for the faint hearted.
    I will also admit that there was “hazing” in the academy but as far as I know the class of ’89 which I used to belong have pledged to stamp it out completely hence the class name “Makatao Class of ’89.”

  • ramrod said:

    “ramfrod, you don’t make yourself knowledgeable by calling me “ignorant”. prove that you are smart, or well-informed, by what you post here. as far as i can see, there is nothing to show that you are. Being able to quote or copy the full statement of the alumni assoc. of pma, or even its “code of honor”, just doesn’t cut it.” – bencard

    I did not say that I was, I didn’t say you were ignorant also. I don’t have to, I know so, and one of the biggest companies in the world also. Don’t get too riled up for nothing, this is not worth your high blood pressure. Take it easy and stop trying to sound too american using “ain’t” or “cut it” your asian don’t humiliate yourself.

  • ramrod said:

    “The challenge to PMAers who are committed to reviving the honor code could be a pledge to resist being political appointees or run in an elections within a specific period after getting out of service. Ret Generals now occupying appointive posts can lead the way by resigning. Without the challenge to sacrifice, the PMA AA statement is plain simple rhetoric.” – pete

    Its been the dilema even 20 years ago, even longer. Cadets graduate, become officers, they start out very idealistic, but then after a while become corrupt and act as if they didn’t learn anything from all those years in the academy. If these officers came from any other institution it would have been understandable but they came from an institution that borders on fanaticism in the inculcation of courage, loyalty, and integrity.
    Maybe its just a few bad eggs, but why is the impact of these bad eggs rocking the very core of this institution?

  • ramrod said:

    Bencard,

    Please accept my apologies if I offended you, its nothing personal. Sometimes I’m a jerk, I need help. I’m really sorry for the times I slipped up. No excuses, a jerk’s a jerk…

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencard,

    sorry for butting in but re “Being able to quote or copy the full statement of the alumni assoc. of pma, or even its “code of honor”, just doesn’t cut it.”, I believe ramrod has already revealed that he IS a PMAer Class 89 and so should know about the PMA code of honour.

    He had to memorize that early on during his cadetship, otherwise he would be punished, i.e., asked to carry the world.

  • Bencard said:

    ramrod, no offense taken but apology accepted. sometimes we are taken by the passion of our personal advocacies that we are driven to use stronger words than we mean to. in hindsight, i probably did misconstrue your use of the word ignorant (which you probably intended to refer to my lack of precise knowledge of the exact language of the pma’s code of honor, which i admit).

    mlq3, i meant to post this much earlier but when i tried, i got the familiar “server cannot be found”. if i may hazard a guess, i think the reason why the pma class 1940 turned out the way it was is that the members were mentored by the americans a la west point, with gen. douglas mcarthur the big chief. this illustrates the first half of your grandfather’s famous metaphor “government run like heaven by the americans”. in contrast, class 1971 was (mis)guided by what became the muscles of the marcos’ dictatorship, going on to become the implementors of the martial law, many of whom are still around as politicians, bureaucrats and business executives. this represents the other half of the metaphor “run like hell by the filipinos”.

  • ramrod said:

    “in contrast, class 1971 was (mis)guided by what became the muscles of the marcos’ dictatorship, going on to become the implementors of the martial law, many of whom are still around as politicians, bureaucrats and business executives” – bencard

    Yes. I agree, during the Marcos era there were some “strange” changes even in the academy. Meanwhile, they were seeing the emergence of well to do generals and officers, with lifestyles of the rich and famous. Martial Law and the human rights violations that came with it was deplorable, the use of “unorthodox” methods of extracting intel was immoral as the military shifted from being the protector of the people to its “suppresor” and “oppressor.” Nevertheless, there were still those who remained true.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    bencard, no, the comparisons mccoy made were based precisely on the point that both classes of pma represented the same tradition: the time pma became entirely filipino-run and trained.

  • ramrod said:

    MLQ3,

    Thank you for the new reading material suggestion, I will try to look for it in National Bookstore or Powerbooks. The title itself makes the hair on my nape stand on end, “closer than brothers” can actually be summed up in one word – “MISTAH.”

    The methods of torture were not invented by the Filipinos, these were taught to us by the Americans, we can’t take credit for such sophistication. History has a list of generals who believed that the ends justify the means, McArthur, Patton, Pershing, to name a few.
    “In war there is no substitute for victory…” -McArthur

    I cannot possibly deprive everyone of their opinion about the military especially the “adventurists,” all I ask is for everyone to be more “compassionate” after all these are young men, misguided though they may be, they acted on what they believed in. They knew what they were in for and are paying for it as we speak/blog. These men have families and friends who are also suffering…After all these are not merciless killers or rapists, these are our soldiers.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    ramrod, if you can find it, get gen. vicente lim’s “to inspire and to lead: the letters of gen. vicente lim,” republished by his family, i believe you can get t either through aim or the copy i have, i bought in the pma gift shop in baguio.

    mccoy’s book was widely discussed among pma alumni.

  • ramrod said:

    MLQ3,

    I bought a copy of “Closer than Brothers.” I can’t believe it, its very insightful, if you read my comments on your blog, they’re just bits and pieces of the whole, its only now that I’m beginning to reconcile certain aspects of my youth and the way I seem to behave and think right now that always seems unrelatable for my peers.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    ramrod, that was a ground-breaking book, and writing it has continued to haunt mccoy from what i hear. as a civilian, it helped me get an insight into the military mind.

  • Bencard said:

    mlq3, regardless of what victor mccoy says (this is the first time i heard of him), the pma was established by the americans under their colonial regime and administered it through the end of the commonwealth in 1946 when the country “run like hell by the filipinos” officially began. this is the history i know and since you are the historian, correct me if i am wrong.

    pma class 1940, if not directly mentored by the americans, were nurtured under the american military traditions of “honor, duty and country”. the values that were inculcated on its members were the values that saw us through the 2nd world war. they were vastly different from the values they possessed during the martial law and thereafter.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    bencard, it’s the historian al mccoy. he first gained notoriety having exposed the marcos medals as fakes (along with the work of boni gillego).

    the americans had set up the constabulary early on to “pacify” the country and while a militia of sorts was organized during ww1, it was disbanded thereafter (one filipino managed to die in ww1 and there are still camps named after him, tomas claudio).

    it was only with the commonwealth that the country could begin training its armed forces, under filipino officers (transferees from the only us army unit which allowed filipinos to become officers, the philippine scouts) with training and supervision by an entirely separate group of american military advisers. the american army retained its own administration and command structure under the philippine department which took a rather skeptical view of their fellow american officers engaging in army-building with the filipinos.

    the first two laws of the commonwealth identified the two primary concerns of the new government. commonwealth act no. established the basis for the philippine army; commonwealth act. no 2 established the national economic council, today’s neda. among the first priorities of the new philippine army was the establishment of an officer’s school.

    if you consult the roster of the office of the philippine army, it was staffed entirely by filipinos:

    central general staff:
    maj. gen. basilio j. valdes, chief of staff
    birg. gen. vicente p. lim, deputy chief of staff
    lieut.col. simeon de jesus, asst. COS G-1
    col. fidel segundo, asst. COS G-2
    col. rafael garcia, asst. COS G-3
    lt. col. ireneo buencusejo, asst. COS G-4
    capt. amadeo magtoto, actng. asst. COS G-5
    maj. elias dioquino, sec. to the COS

    then there was the special general staff, incl. the adjutant general, the corps of engineers, judge advocate servbice, signal officer, medical service, quartermaster service, chaplain service, ordinance service, off-shore patrol (precursor of the navy): only two americans here: major fr. edwin ronan, chief of the chaplain service and maj. charles backes, USA, chief of the air corps of the philippine army.

    then there were the military commanders:

    col. mateo capinpin, division commander, first regular division, camp murphy, rizal (today’s camp aguinaldo, qc)
    col. pastor martelino, superintendent, philippine military academy, baguio
    maj. milton hill (an american) commandant, general services school, baguio
    capt. filomeno b. villaluz, commandant, school for reserve commission, camp james b. ord, san miguel, tarlac (this, i beleive, is where reserve officers like manuel roxas and benito soliven, father of max, and jacobo zobel trained)

    1st. lt. adriano valdez, commandant, school for reserve commission, camp kiethley, lanao

    the authority to lend american officers to foreign armies for advisory/training purposes was granted by american legislation and by our commonwealth act no. 1. the philippine army was placed under the command of macarthur when he was recalled to active duty shortly before ww2 broke out; the PA was integrated into USAFFE.

    so there was close cooperation but it would be wrong to think that from 1935-1941 the philippine army was entirely controlled by the americans, much less the pma, which was established with the principles and methods of west point in mind (macarthur had been commandant of west point prior to being cos of the us army), but if you read the letters of general lim, you will see it was mainly filipinos organizing the new army: in cases, bitterly divided between veteran officers of the constabulary and those, like lim, who’d served in the philippine scouts.

    the logistical, political, strategic and tactical problems of practically building up a national armed forces from scratch are brilliantly covered in

    http://www.ateneopress.org/detail_socsci.asp?ID=51

    the philippine army, 1935-1942, by ricardo trota jose.

    perhaps your misconceptions are due to not appreciating the extent and latitude of what commonwealth status was. in fattct we were more advanced in this regard than india and pakistan, who had millions of their citizens serve in the british armed forces. even after independence, for a time, they continued to have british commanders. we already had general officers in bataan.

  • ramrod said:

    The book is a brilliant account of how the concept of the “professional soldier” was created. It actually started as Manuel L. Quezon’s brainchild, he’s deliberate design to divorce the military leadership from the oligarch as opposed to the Spanish model showed remarkable foresight for it paved the groundwork for the officer as “manager” in the evolution of our officer corps. It actually answered my questions on the origin of hazing (from West Point) but pointed out the differances in execution. What was really interesting was that he got so much material from the class of ’40 themselves and how they used the bonds of their class to prevent any member from compromising, from being politicised, and from plotting coups while all around them, coups were springing up in southeast asia. In contrast, ’71 used these bonds to recruit their members to plot coups. The class of ’40 retained their nationalism and adhered to the premise of civilian authority whereas ’71 adopted this “heroic” stance saviour of the people. This explains a lot of things, the meetings in ’87 with Honasan and Kapunan, the pervading “messianic” mentality of that time and the use of “unorthodox” or excessive force to achieve desired results. Personally this only made me realize that I’m not psychotic and my current preference for a particular management style that scares most employees and even my bosses (but they like the results). This also explains why there seems to be a split persona in the officer corps, one that upholds the superiority of civilian authority and the other “save the people from themselves.” I didn’t bother reading any material about the academy before because I thought no one will be able to accurately write about it unless they experience cadet life themselves, I’m sure this was widely read and discussed, if not it should be read and discussed. I will as with my mistah who is teaching at the academy if he’s read this and see what he thinks. The details are accurate from the “reception” where plebes meet the “immaculates” for the first time, the “beast barracks,” the “recognition.” Even the harassment that happens before recognition. I only noticed one detail that was not that accurate, the “bridging” its when you bend over backwards and put your head and upper torso midway between the lower and upper bunks, its a painful experience but you get used to it after a while, you’ll learn to maintain this position for hours.
    It precisely explains the reason or causes of the issues brought up by the alumni association in 2006. I haven’t finished reading it yet…

  • Bencard said:

    mlq3, don’t go overboard. what misconceptions are you talking about? didn’t you agree with me that the philippine military(including pma) was administered by the americans, albeit staffed by filipinos trained by the americans up until around the end of world war 2, or specifically 7/4/46? all the filipino generals you listed were trained by the americans.

    i fully understand the “extent and latitude” of the philippine commonwealth. sovereignty still resided with the u.s. and all government authority emanated from it, although filipinos were given the “privilege of “self government, subject to u.s. constitution and statutes.

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    bencard, perhaps our differences are over definitions. the only things the usa administered were foreign affairs and currency and a constitutional veto power. sovereignty, on the other hand, was retained by the usa pending recognition of independence. in all other matters, within philippine territory filipinos did the administering and philippine laws were final and executory (my understanding is that prior to 1935 philippine supreme court decisions were subject to review by the us supreme court; after 1935 the phil. supreme court became 100% filipino, american justices were retired and decisions no longer subject to being overturned by american courts). we had our own constitution, instead of organic acts; this is also why, for example, we passed our own immigration law (still in force) in 1940, i believe.

    administration of the pma by americans? no. not even of the philippine army. even supervision? i’d dispute that. assistance and training is an entirely different thing which continues to this day. for example, the commander in chief of the philippine army was not the president of the united states, it was the president of the philippines. americans took actual command of the philippine army only when they were mustered into the service of the united states by formal proclamation in late 1941. this was also the basis the americans later used to justify denying filipinos veteran’s benefits matching those given to gi’s.

    but there may be legal nuances i’m missing out on here.

  • Bencard said:

    p.s., that is why the 1935 philippine constitution had to be approved by the u.s. legislature under the tydings-mcduffie law (which replaced the hare-hawes-cutting act lobbied by then speaker sergio osmena, sr.).

  • Bencard said:

    mlq3, prior to july 4, 1946, the americans giveth and could take it away. they could have “sold” us to the japanese if they wanted to, in the same way we were sold to the americans by the spaniards under the treaty of paris (was it 1896?).

  • ramrod said:

    “Though once an officer in that army, Quezon instead chose the Western ideal of military professionalism. The United States lent its full support to his decison by sending advisors to Manila and bringing Filipino officers to America for advance training.
    “With the help of these ADVISORS, the president opened the new Philippine Military Academy in 1936 with an entering class of 120 cadets and a four-year curriculum modeled in every detail, upon West Point. Indeed, Quezon made the PMA his “pet project” – selecting its site at Baguio, picking staff, investigating cadet derelictions, and making frequent informal visits.”
    page 24, Closer than Brothers

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    p.p.s approved not by the us legislature, but by the president of the united states. the us legislature’s purposes were done when it specified in the tydings-mcduffie act certain basics the constitution should contain (a bill of rights and recognition of us sovereignty until 1946, among others).

    pls. refer to

    http://philippinesfreepress.wordpress.com/2006/02/10/constitution-day-february-7-1953/

    and

    http://philippinesfreepress.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/why-they-voted-against-the-constitution-june-1-1935/

    and

    http://philippinesfreepress.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/primer-on-the-plebiscite-october-21-1939/

Leave your response!

You must be logged in to post a comment.