<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Numerology and politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/</link>
	<description>Punditry. Politics. History. Commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mindanaoan</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-816660</link>
		<dc:creator>mindanaoan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 02:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-816660</guid>
		<description>supremo, how simplistic to think what&#039;s good in one place should also be applied elsewhere. and as a solution to a completely different problem at that. not to mention we cannot afford to choose wrong priorities because we don&#039;t have money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>supremo, how simplistic to think what&#8217;s good in one place should also be applied elsewhere. and as a solution to a completely different problem at that. not to mention we cannot afford to choose wrong priorities because we don&#8217;t have money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815780</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 05:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815780</guid>
		<description>welcome leytenian, sometimes it is confusing in the U.S, because crossing the State Line you could be subject to a different state&#039;s law..whereas, criminal code is uniform all over Canada, while civil law is the same in all provinces except in Quebec which still follows the Napoleonic (French) Civil Code.. there is a little variation in Social Programs, but mostly similar laws in most...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>welcome leytenian, sometimes it is confusing in the U.S, because crossing the State Line you could be subject to a different state&#8217;s law..whereas, criminal code is uniform all over Canada, while civil law is the same in all provinces except in Quebec which still follows the Napoleonic (French) Civil Code.. there is a little variation in Social Programs, but mostly similar laws in most&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leytenian</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815600</link>
		<dc:creator>leytenian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815600</guid>
		<description>vic,
agree. i actually called a gay friend who are planning to get married in california, he told me the same ( federal jurisdiction). thanks Vic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vic,<br />
agree. i actually called a gay friend who are planning to get married in california, he told me the same ( federal jurisdiction). thanks Vic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815583</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815583</guid>
		<description>immigration is a federal government jurisdiction, so california law has no effect on immigration..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>immigration is a federal government jurisdiction, so california law has no effect on immigration..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leytenian</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815543</link>
		<dc:creator>leytenian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815543</guid>
		<description>oic, california i think is now allowing same sex marriages but not sure with immigration policies. it&#039;s interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oic, california i think is now allowing same sex marriages but not sure with immigration policies. it&#8217;s interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815533</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815533</guid>
		<description>leteynian, Canadian immigration law in the area of spousal sponsorships has been extended to
include common-law partners and same-sex partners(requiring proof of having lived together in a commited sexual relationship for at least a year).

But for Fiancee Sponsorship, Iâ€™m not too sure yet, because the Marriage for Convenience, that is always not allowed  as some of them is still at the discretion of the Immigration Officers in Charge to decide and also most countries where the same sex partner may come from does not recognize same sex marriage.  But if the couple can get married in Canada or in a country where it is legal, sponsoring the spouse of Same Sex is the Same as the Opposite Sex...the simplest way is for the prospective partner to come as a Tourist, get married and get sponsored from Within the Country or both go to a country where same sex marriage is legal and start from there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leteynian, Canadian immigration law in the area of spousal sponsorships has been extended to<br />
include common-law partners and same-sex partners(requiring proof of having lived together in a commited sexual relationship for at least a year).</p>
<p>But for Fiancee Sponsorship, Iâ€™m not too sure yet, because the Marriage for Convenience, that is always not allowed  as some of them is still at the discretion of the Immigration Officers in Charge to decide and also most countries where the same sex partner may come from does not recognize same sex marriage.  But if the couple can get married in Canada or in a country where it is legal, sponsoring the spouse of Same Sex is the Same as the Opposite Sex&#8230;the simplest way is for the prospective partner to come as a Tourist, get married and get sponsored from Within the Country or both go to a country where same sex marriage is legal and start from there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leytenian</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815507</link>
		<dc:creator>leytenian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815507</guid>
		<description>Vic,

Can a gay person citizen of canada petition a gay lover from overseas? LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vic,</p>
<p>Can a gay person citizen of canada petition a gay lover from overseas? LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815453</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815453</guid>
		<description>The parental leave is applicable upon adaption of a child for every child, just like the parental leave allowed traditional couple for every child birth or adaption...and also the common law relationship (continuous relationship of at least 3 years) applied to traditional couple for the purpose of being considered married under the law for settlement of property or children custody upon termination of relationship or death of one partner is also applicable to both...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parental leave is applicable upon adaption of a child for every child, just like the parental leave allowed traditional couple for every child birth or adaption&#8230;and also the common law relationship (continuous relationship of at least 3 years) applied to traditional couple for the purpose of being considered married under the law for settlement of property or children custody upon termination of relationship or death of one partner is also applicable to both&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vic</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815443</link>
		<dc:creator>vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815443</guid>
		<description>upn,
&lt;strong&gt;yes&lt;/strong&gt;, same sex couples do even have the rights for paid parental leaves given traditional couple let  me compute: one year minus 17 weeks for maternity, paid and divisible beteen parents. It is now EQUAL...and Sex realignment surgery(sex change) is listed again upon being delisted from the Provincial Health Coverage 10 years. Been covered since l97l but was delisted by the Conservatives 10 years ago.  now it&#039;s free again for those who wants to convert, of course with &quot;rigorous psychological&quot; prerequisites as per the Health Minister...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>upn,<br />
<strong>yes</strong>, same sex couples do even have the rights for paid parental leaves given traditional couple let  me compute: one year minus 17 weeks for maternity, paid and divisible beteen parents. It is now EQUAL&#8230;and Sex realignment surgery(sex change) is listed again upon being delisted from the Provincial Health Coverage 10 years. Been covered since l97l but was delisted by the Conservatives 10 years ago.  now it&#8217;s free again for those who wants to convert, of course with &#8220;rigorous psychological&#8221; prerequisites as per the Health Minister&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UP n student</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2008/05/21/numerology-and-politics/comment-page-5/#comment-815257</link>
		<dc:creator>UP n student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/1799/numerology-and-politics/#comment-815257</guid>
		<description>vic:  has the legality of same-sex marriage in Canada extended beyond money?  For example, does a same-sex couple have the same rights to adopting a child  as the traditional couple?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vic:  has the legality of same-sex marriage in Canada extended beyond money?  For example, does a same-sex couple have the same rights to adopting a child  as the traditional couple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
