<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Escalation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/</link>
	<description>Punditry. Politics. History. Commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: d0d0ng</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-645475</link>
		<dc:creator>d0d0ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-645475</guid>
		<description>grd on, &quot;iÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m interested with your take on why the US did not attack north korea (while it did not hesitate against iraq). that country has been threatening the US and its neighbors ever since with its nuclear capability. instead, the US succumbed to north koreaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s blackmail and giving in to its demands.&quot;

There are 2 prevailing factors going on in Korean Peninsula, (1) new generation of South Korea (which is the power base of current South Korean President) has desire for reunification similar to Germany , (2) Bejing&#039;s active role as the leading player in the six party talks to de-nuclearize North Korea. Both Bejing and South Korea President (not to give up gains in inter-Korean relations) downplayed the North Korea missile test threat and willing to take the risk. There is a clear path toward de-nuclearize North Korea. In fact, USFK is drawing down its american forces in Korean peninsula and planning to cede control of its war command authority to the deputy Korean commander. In the same way, US ceded leadership of the six party talks to China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>grd on, &#8220;iÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m interested with your take on why the US did not attack north korea (while it did not hesitate against iraq). that country has been threatening the US and its neighbors ever since with its nuclear capability. instead, the US succumbed to north koreaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s blackmail and giving in to its demands.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are 2 prevailing factors going on in Korean Peninsula, (1) new generation of South Korea (which is the power base of current South Korean President) has desire for reunification similar to Germany , (2) Bejing&#8217;s active role as the leading player in the six party talks to de-nuclearize North Korea. Both Bejing and South Korea President (not to give up gains in inter-Korean relations) downplayed the North Korea missile test threat and willing to take the risk. There is a clear path toward de-nuclearize North Korea. In fact, USFK is drawing down its american forces in Korean peninsula and planning to cede control of its war command authority to the deputy Korean commander. In the same way, US ceded leadership of the six party talks to China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvj</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-645206</link>
		<dc:creator>cvj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-645206</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If US is as bad as if not worse than the WW2 Japanese and Hitler Germany (giving you the benefit of doubt), why Middle East and all Arab countries, Europe, Russia and China did not join forces to fight the great villain United States? - dOdOng&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The rest of the world (including a good portion of the American public) has expressed its opposition to the invasion of Iraq in a &lt;b&gt;peaceful manner&lt;/b&gt;.  Unlike the American aggressors, the rest of the world values the ways of peace.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Whose security? You know better than that. In fact, when US Congress recently announced that it would tie the aid to extrajudicial killings problems, Phil govÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t is crying out loud for split of milk. - dOdOng&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You think our officials are crying because of national security?  You know better than that.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Maybe you should ask Kuwait govÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. whose land was invaded by Iraq. - dOdOng&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With or without the American invasion, the Iraqis were no longer in a position to re-invade Kuwait after they were driven out.  What additional benefit will a million dead Iraqis give them?  

&lt;blockquote&gt;Or the Saudi govÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. whose Sunni relatives in Iraq are direct victims of war. The Saudis warned the US it will fight the Shiites if US will leave Iraq too soon in power sharing vaccum. - dOdOng&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To be more specific, the Sunnis are the direct victims of the &lt;b&gt;American invasion&lt;/b&gt;. On the possibility of a regional or civil war in the event the US left Iraq, the United States was already warned beforehand that their presence would destabilize the region. The Americans did not listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If US is as bad as if not worse than the WW2 Japanese and Hitler Germany (giving you the benefit of doubt), why Middle East and all Arab countries, Europe, Russia and China did not join forces to fight the great villain United States? &#8211; dOdOng</p></blockquote>
<p>The rest of the world (including a good portion of the American public) has expressed its opposition to the invasion of Iraq in a <b>peaceful manner</b>.  Unlike the American aggressors, the rest of the world values the ways of peace.</p>
<blockquote><p>Whose security? You know better than that. In fact, when US Congress recently announced that it would tie the aid to extrajudicial killings problems, Phil govÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t is crying out loud for split of milk. &#8211; dOdOng</p></blockquote>
<p>You think our officials are crying because of national security?  You know better than that.</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe you should ask Kuwait govÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. whose land was invaded by Iraq. &#8211; dOdOng</p></blockquote>
<p>With or without the American invasion, the Iraqis were no longer in a position to re-invade Kuwait after they were driven out.  What additional benefit will a million dead Iraqis give them?  </p>
<blockquote><p>Or the Saudi govÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. whose Sunni relatives in Iraq are direct victims of war. The Saudis warned the US it will fight the Shiites if US will leave Iraq too soon in power sharing vaccum. &#8211; dOdOng</p></blockquote>
<p>To be more specific, the Sunnis are the direct victims of the <b>American invasion</b>. On the possibility of a regional or civil war in the event the US left Iraq, the United States was already warned beforehand that their presence would destabilize the region. The Americans did not listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grd</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-645038</link>
		<dc:creator>grd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-645038</guid>
		<description>dodong, iÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m interested with your take on why the US did not attack north korea (while it did not hesitate against iraq). that country has been threatening the US and its neighbors ever since with its nuclear capability. instead, the US succumbed to north koreaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s blackmail and giving in to its demands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dodong, iÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m interested with your take on why the US did not attack north korea (while it did not hesitate against iraq). that country has been threatening the US and its neighbors ever since with its nuclear capability. instead, the US succumbed to north koreaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s blackmail and giving in to its demands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d0d0ng</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-644650</link>
		<dc:creator>d0d0ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-644650</guid>
		<description>&quot;You think when Iran has nuclear weapons the US will dare invade it like it did Iraq?&quot;

You think US will not attack nuclear Pakistan if Musharraf pick Taliban instead of US?

You should read Musharraf&#039;s memoirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You think when Iran has nuclear weapons the US will dare invade it like it did Iraq?&#8221;</p>
<p>You think US will not attack nuclear Pakistan if Musharraf pick Taliban instead of US?</p>
<p>You should read Musharraf&#8217;s memoirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d0d0ng</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-644638</link>
		<dc:creator>d0d0ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-644638</guid>
		<description>cvj on, &quot;What about the horrors of the American Invasion of Iraq?&quot;

Maybe you should ask Kuwait gov&#039;t. whose land was invaded by Iraq. Or the Saudi gov&#039;t. whose Sunni relatives in Iraq are direct victims of war. The Saudis warned the US it will fight the Shiites if US will leave Iraq too soon in power sharing vaccum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cvj on, &#8220;What about the horrors of the American Invasion of Iraq?&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe you should ask Kuwait gov&#8217;t. whose land was invaded by Iraq. Or the Saudi gov&#8217;t. whose Sunni relatives in Iraq are direct victims of war. The Saudis warned the US it will fight the Shiites if US will leave Iraq too soon in power sharing vaccum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d0d0ng</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-644629</link>
		<dc:creator>d0d0ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-644629</guid>
		<description>cvj on, &quot;Military aid is for the purpose of achieving national security. If the Philippine alliance with America results in it being involved in the latterÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s wars, then such aid defeats the purpose and is not worth accepting.&quot;

Whose security? You know better than that. In fact, when US Congress recently announced that it would tie the aid to extrajudicial killings problems, Phil gov&#039;t is crying out loud for split of milk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cvj on, &#8220;Military aid is for the purpose of achieving national security. If the Philippine alliance with America results in it being involved in the latterÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s wars, then such aid defeats the purpose and is not worth accepting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whose security? You know better than that. In fact, when US Congress recently announced that it would tie the aid to extrajudicial killings problems, Phil gov&#8217;t is crying out loud for split of milk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bencard</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-644579</link>
		<dc:creator>Bencard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-644579</guid>
		<description>devils, if associating you with cvj was pejorative, then i would plead &#039;guilty as charged&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>devils, if associating you with cvj was pejorative, then i would plead &#8216;guilty as charged&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d0d0ng</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-644557</link>
		<dc:creator>d0d0ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-644557</guid>
		<description>&quot;cvj, thank you for putting this guy in place. crazy neo-con.&quot;

Maybe, you did not understand the neo-cons. In light of next year election, we will see the first woman US President and US Middle East policy will not change significantly. Your neo-cons concept is evidently out of place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;cvj, thank you for putting this guy in place. crazy neo-con.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe, you did not understand the neo-cons. In light of next year election, we will see the first woman US President and US Middle East policy will not change significantly. Your neo-cons concept is evidently out of place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d0d0ng</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-644552</link>
		<dc:creator>d0d0ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-644552</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot to mention Egypt, which is across the border.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot to mention Egypt, which is across the border.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d0d0ng</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/11/14/escalation/comment-page-7/#comment-644551</link>
		<dc:creator>d0d0ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1599#comment-644551</guid>
		<description>&quot;And it has always tried expanding its Ã¢â‚¬Å“buffer-zoneÃ¢â‚¬Â in any way it can.&quot;

Sorry. If your statement is true, Jordan and Saudi Arabia would be the first to say that to the United States. That is why I am saying, please check your facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And it has always tried expanding its Ã¢â‚¬Å“buffer-zoneÃ¢â‚¬Â in any way it can.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry. If your statement is true, Jordan and Saudi Arabia would be the first to say that to the United States. That is why I am saying, please check your facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

