Home » Daily Dose

Escalation

14 November 2007 319 Comments

Before we get to the blast at the Batasan Pambansa, let’s set the scene, as it was, yesterday, prior to the explosion.

The way Amando Doronila sees it, Political scandals undermining the economy, and foreign observers, too, see it the same way, as shown by this snippet:

Frederic Neumann wrote in a commentary: “We view the recent political scandals as severely undermining the President’s ability to persuade the Congress to pass new policy initiatives to advance structural reforms … The scandals will make it harder for the President to advance a new wave of policy reforms, especially relating to improving the underlying public finance sector finances.”

Neumann noted that the government had made a commitment to wipe out its budget deficits and was closing in on its full-year deficit target of P63 billlion, with the help of privatization proceeds, but its fiscal performance was “less impressive,” suggesting that more reforms were needed.

Doronila seems to have a view that’s very different from the triumphalist tones of the President herself, who seems to be crowing that her economic work is done. In Arroyo shifts focus from economic to political reforms, she is quoted as having said,

Now that we have straightened out the economy, it is time to push for political reforms. Let us reduce conflict, fight corruption, and put the welfare of the ordinary Filipino first,” Arroyo said.

But there’s something ironic in a political animal bellowing about being a beast (though a very well-educated ones with academic credentials) if it was funny-ha-ha to have the Speaker thundering on about a “moral revolution,” isn’t it funny-hee-hee, now that Arroyo blames politics for causing suicide, murder:

Arroyo called on her critics anew to focus on promoting development, this time blaming politics for the deaths of Marianette Amper, the 12-year-old girl who committed suicide in Davao due to poverty, and Alioden Dalaig, the poll official gunned down last Saturday.

“Many Filipinos are experiencing poverty since some of the country’s leaders are preoccupied with their self-interests rather than the welfare of the nation.

“On the other hand, there are politicians and groups who have no heart and conscience and are ready to use violence to attain their ambitions,” she said in a speech at the National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC) meeting yesterday in Malacañang.

“The preoccupation with politics, past and present, does not promote the stability, policy continuity, security and peace and order that we will need to continue to move our country forward.”

But then of course she knows whereof she speaks, so there’s nothing funny about it, at all. Point is, the President was going on the political offensive, on the premise that (unlike the view of the foreign observers mentioned by Doronila) everything economics-wise, was shipshape. While Marvin A. Tort delves into the merits and demerits of the appreciating peso, the President, long a fetishist of the “strong peso equals a Strong Republic” sort, has no choice but to ponder relief to stave off the worst effects of the appreciating peso (the majority of the two articles above, describe the relief efforts the President’s decreed as a kind of series of emergency measures, which will help the poor but leaves exporters vulnerable still).

The best defense being a good offense, the President knew full well that the opposition had left her self-innoculation devoid of oomph. As the Inquirer editorial today puts it, the President’s reliance on a tactical, and not ethical, approach to questions as to her legitimacy or fitness for office, has reached the end of the road:

This has led to the adoption by the administration of a tactical, instead of ethical, approach to the impeachment process. Yet the kind of people involved — politicians — then and now aren’t very different. Quirino faced vicious infighting within his Liberal Party reminiscent of the intramurals between Kampi and Lakas today, with a relatively small opposition hounding both Presidents.

Indeed the only difference we see is that Quirino genuinely believed in his innocence and trusted the process. Quirino knew, as one of the framers of the 1935 Constitution, what impeachment is: a means by which a nation being governed badly can gain relief. As chief executive he asserted that relief was unnecessary; as a lawyer, he knew his salvation lay in confronting his accusers and opening access to information, and presenting evidence.

In contrast, President Macapagal-Arroyo mistrusts the process and the people in it. Her allies and critics in the House have conspired to approve rules that deny impeachable officials proper vindication not only before the House, but in the court of public opinion. And the Supreme Court, too, has handed down decisions that have mutated impeachment into a race to file weak complaints to stave off genuine ones.

In other words, all three branches of government are stuck in a trap, with each blaming the other for tying its hand, resulting in what we have today. Yet among these institutions, it is the House that still has in its hands the means to pass new rules in keeping with those of 1949. But it won’t, because it prefers the Palace cash buffet. Its members worship at the altar of Mammon instead of the altar of public duty.

Everything else, House-wise, on the part of the majority is bravado on the part of those left holding the bag: House majority rebuffs minority boycott of impeach hearings.

And also, because the best defense is a good offense, this took place: Panlilio, 8 more charged with bribery over Palace handouts. This was something people saw coming: Ateneo official rallies support for embattled Panlilio.

And also, because the best defense is a good offense, just as whistle blowers get the book thrown at them, anyone showing any kind of independence within the ruling coalition gets the Palace pit bills unleashed on them. Manuel Buencamino pens an open letter not for the faint of heart  to Juan Ponce Enrile, senior Palace pit bull.

And so, having set the scene, let’s move on to the Batasan blast. I’d just emerged from a dinner conversation with a foreign businessman who was quite worried over the effect the appreciating peso was having on ordinary people and, of course, on the bigger Filipino exporters and other businessmen with whom he did business, and who now had to put plans for expanding or upgrading their equipment on hold (for my part, I traded notes on the true extent of smuggling which is also devastating legitimate businesses). The businessman was particularly puzzled by how the appreciating peso was resulting in an increase in the cost of basic commodities, which then led to a discussion on rice and sugar smuggling, etc.

Ironically, the businessman began our conversation by telling me how he’d first arrived in the Philippines on August 21, 1983, and the pandemonium that had ensued at the Manila International Airport as he arrived shortly before Ninoy Aquino’s flight. Anyway, as I left the meeting, I received a text asking for confirmation of the blast, and so contacted colleagues in the Inquirer who confirmed it; and so it went until midnight, when the President made a brief statement. What struck me most was the quavery voice of Rep. Darlene Custodio.

The initial responses on the blogosphere run the gamut of points of view, and helps provide an insight into the public’s reaction to the news. Whether its Shasha says or Andre’s Journal! a common reaction, on one part, is to be stupefied-and-angry (or relieved to be headed abroad, like Badfish) or simply astounded, like spiderye, or being held hostage by a creeping feeling that there’s an unfolding plot, and of God-knows-what to come, as blue law by anna writes:

Holy shit. They are NOT stopping. People kasi were criticizing them before, eh why the common tao your targeting, during the Glorietta bombing, so now I guess they’re trying to prove a point, that even law-makers, wala, nothing fazes or scares us, we WILL get our point across. What point ba???!!! What do they want? My god, when the Glorietta bombing went off, I felt really bad and angry, but I didn’t feel scared pa rin. I mean, I wasn’t afraid to go malling still or go around public places. But with this Batasan bombing, I’m like, oh my god, I got a really really bad feeling in my stomach, like, of things to come, this is probably not the end of it. Punyeta silang lahat. Nakaraos na yung bayan from our history of violence and unrest tapos ngayon binabalik balik nila.

Or simply being ticked off, as OLSEN 3 was, of people immediately cracking jokes. Outside Manila, in Antique, Antikenyo says people shrugged it off.

Inner Sanctum runs through all the conspiracy theories, and correctly points out,

While there’s nothing new about politicians getting murdered, it’s the audacity of the attack that sends jitters to most people, including myself. I don’t recall lawmakers’ domains (in this case, the Batasang Pambansa) ever getting bombed. If I’m not mistaken, this is the first time that an attack happened right inside the compound that houses congress.

Piercing Pens tackles other possibilities. Though New Philippine Revolution, a few days back, insisted a pattern of resistance is emerging, I’m still skeptical -coordination has not been a characteristic of the groups opposed to the administration, who more often than not, can barely manage to talk civilly to each other.

As it stands, the initial details are fully covered by the papers, see Bomb rocks Congress; solon among 3 killed and Police recover mobile phone at Congress blast site. And Arroyo creates task force vs political violence.

Even as Akbar dies, Teves in critical condition, and media attention therefore focuses on ‘Akbar, wives controlled Basilan’ (going back even further, see Ellen Tordesillas’ Akbar and the ghost of the Lamitan siege and this profile in the San Francisco Chronicle) that old reliable had to shoot his mouth off yet again: Gonzales: ‘We got the warning two weeks ago’.

You know, Gonzales didn’t help matters during the Glorietta blast, and he isn’t helping matters now. Just as one question -who was the target?- is only beginning to be resolved, Gonzales helps raise even more questions -if the target was Akbar, and government knew, why then, did the assassination (if that’s what it was) take place? The government will announce its suspects soon enough, but that, too, will raise more questions, I’m sure.

Anyway, if Akbar was the target, then it’s no different from the assassinations of other congressmen in Metro Manila right before the May elections. It shows that congressmen aren’t beyond vendetta killings formerly restricted to their home provinces -and a general deterioration in the ability of the authorities to maintain law and order.

The collateral damage, if that’s all it was, right at the House of Representatives, also sends a message that I suspect was the cause of Darlene Custodio’s quavery voice, as she described the scene at the time. They are all in it together, and in the end, enemies of the representatives aren’t interested in separating the sheep from the goats.

for me, what is significant is that it’s unclear who, precisely, dismissed the House security detail in the wake of the bombing. If it was the Speaker, then that’s fine; if it was the Secretary of the Interior, that’s an infringement on the independence of the House. This is no trivial matter, even if justified by the authorities as a question of security. If the Palace, in charge of the police power, cocoons representatives and senators in security, the legislators shouldn’t forget that it was an imposition. So far, that hasn’t happened; the Secretary of the Interior has merely offered additional security to legislators if and when they request it, which is the absolutely right way to approach security concerns.

More on Rep. Akbar in reason is the reason:

The lowdown the wife and I got from Dr. J, who was working at the FEU Hospital near the Batasang Pambansa Complex, was that the bomb had been intended for Congressman Wahab Akbar, the Distinguished Gentleman from Basilan.

An interview I heard on the radio later confirmed that the blast had likely come from a remote-controlled IED, detonated by someone within visual range of Akbar.

Akbar had unfortunately developed a routine that his enemies were quick to use to their advantage – he would have his driver pick him up at the same exit, so conveniently close to the motorcycle parking area where a bomb could easily be transported and hidden.

A quick Google search seems to indicate that Akbar had had it coming. He was alleged to have been in cahoots with the Abu Sayyaf commanders holed up in the Lamitan siege: “a group of army officers, ASG members and local governor Wahab Akbar split ransom money that they received for the ‘escape’ of three hostages in the early stages of the episode.”

In a controversial privilege speech, Akbar also claimed that 80% of Filipino Muslims were sympathetic to the Abu Sayyaf. In the same speech, Akbar made the bold claim “I am Basilan” – which wouldn’t be far from the truth, considering that two of his wives have won the top elective positions in the island province.

There’s a moral to be found here, where a man can claim to personify a violent, backward province one day – and end up riddled with shrapnel the next.

That, indeed, may be all there is to it. Live by the sword, die by the sword. If this is what happened, then the question is, just how firmly the government can clamp down if the suspects prove to be from the military, whether in the service, or AWOL.

As Ricky Carandang points out, it’s business as usual:

What happens next is anyone’s guess, but the House leadership has said that the incident will not prevent them from fulfilling their duty of killing the latest impeachment complaint against President Arroyo.

And indeed, mission accomplished: House committee rejects new impeach rap vs Arroyo.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

319 Comments »

  • inodoro ni emilie said:

    what?!? no shit theory proffered where it is most appropriate?

  • hvrds said:

    While everyone in the Philippines delights in the discussion about economy, the peso dollar rate and other things related, the very sad fact is that we are being buffeted by huge propeller wash caused in an ocean of huge mega ships while we are trying desperately to bale water out of our tiny banca with Big Mike and GMA at the helm.

    Somehow I guess we need it to ratify ourselves that we are important in a world of behemoths.

    http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/delong64

    “Richard Nixon’s treasury secretary, John Connally, once told a group of European leaders that while the dollar was America’s currency, its misalignment was Europe’s problem. Today, the misalignment of the dollar – and the euro – against the renminbi and other Asian currencies is increasingly becoming Asia’s problem.”

    “J. Bradford DeLong, Professor of Economics at the University of California at Berkeley, was Assistant US Treasury Secretary during the Clinton administration.”

  • The Equalizer said:

    “National Security Adviser Norberto Gonzales on Wednesday said an intelligence report on the threat to the life of Basilan Representative Wahab Akbar was received two weeks ago.

    “We got the warning two weeks ago. This could have an implication on who killed him,” said Gonzales.”

    Do you believe this?

    Why didn’t they do anything about so-called security report?

    Why did it happen in the highly secured Batasan complex?

  • Madonna said:

    if Rep. Akbar was the target, a professional assassin would wisely and on orders take out the lawmaker in a surgical manner — Akbar alone! not in the freaking way that it was done right in the premises of the Congress of the Philippines! with so many others killed/injured and such a visual evidence of destruction!!

    the message is chilling indeed. JDV has not suddenly turned saint now that he recently went against GMA for he’s one of those who propped this rotten corrupt political system, but i agree with him that the target was Congress, not Akbar. GMA is not above using gold in such a galling manner so that she could stay in power, she’s not above using terrorism such as the bombing in Congress so that she could hang on to power. will she eventually do a Musharraf? she would, it that’s what it takes!

  • Joselito Basilio said:

    The trouble is the Human Security Act of 2007 (Republic Act No. 9327) or the Anti-Terror Law cannot be applied to the Batasan blast because the law is deemed suspended 2 months after the conduct of any election as provided in the law itself. We just had election last October 29. In effect, this law has no tooth on circumstances like this.

  • Arbet said:

    To indulge inodoro ni emilie: I thought the explosion was caused by the collective fart of congressmen reeling from Php200,000 eating spree.

  • Willy said:

    I wonder if anyone is paying any attention to the driver who was likewise killed, and the family he left behind.

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    Arbet,

    That’s what happens when people shit on their plates.

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    Joselito,

    kaya nga dapat ibasura na yan batas na yan. punishable naman under the Revised Penal Code yun nangyari sa batasan

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    Madonna,

    Kasi december weather na…malamig…so those motorcycle assassins don’t really want to do drive by shootings….bomba na lang at cell phone habang nagkakape sa Starbucks

  • Madonna said:

    i just find it wierd that the gov’t/la gloria tells the public not to speculate — when it’s the police that’s right on the dot on making speculations first — in this case, the take-out Akbar theory — without presenting solid/physical/inconvertible evidence and doing thorough investigation first — not the hogwash that norberto gozales is peddling that there were intel reports about plans to kill akbar — or as ncrpo chief barias that since the mortorcycle that was the source of the bomb was located near akbar’s vehicle, ergo Akbar is the target…what kind of puny logic is this? he carefully avoided the observation na the same motorcycle ay, nakapark near the entrance lobby ng KONGRESO NG PILIPINAS. had rep. teves died too they would be scrambling for another theory to explain what happened. only the most powerful thugs who are in power in this country would dare stage something like this.

    i think most people are not so sympathetic. e kung bombahin ang kongreso na pinamumuhayan ng mga buwaya, they deserve it eh.

    as for me, i’m an ordinary citizen i have the right to be paranoid and to speculate. so fuck gma on calls for the public not to speculate… makapagkape na nga lang sa starbucks! lol, on the other hand, wag na, baka may bomb-carrying goons din duon.

  • levi said:

    MB’s letter to Juan Letse Enrile is a must read.

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    Murder by numbers is what happened to the 2nd impeachment complaint.

    This one was dead on arrival to quote Edcal Lagman on the 2nd impeachment.

    It’s apt that the ones chosen to deliver the eulogies were Marcoleta San Luis and Monica Puentavella, the representaive from Mike Arroyo’s lower intestine.

    I think there’s more to the bombing than simply an assassination. Those motorcycle riding assassins have been pretty efficient so far and there’s really no reason why someone who wanted Akbar killed would not have availed of their services. Why use a bomb when a bullet will suffice?

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    Levi,

    Thanks for your support.

  • j_ag said:

    The sectors that are all growing in double digits that are pulling up the growth rate is narrow and tax revenues are very little affected by this sectors roboust growth.

    Plus the OFW based consumption is also contracting affecting consumption based tax take.

    Apart from selling off government owned assets where oh where are new tax revenues going to come from?

    Capital gains from the equity and bond markets are limited in nature and are not covered by income taxes. Maybe the government should look at raising the capital gains from equity and bond markets.

    Meanwhile the bulk of the economy is struggling along with an inflationary wave building up with high oil prices and high food prices on the horizon.

    All this in a country whose political establishment are figthing over the spoils of power.

    Watch for a bust coming just in time for the 2010 elections. It might come sooner but 2010 looks like the period when the economic perfect storm could occur.

    Now a bombing in the House of Representatives.

    Who is minding the store is one question that everyone is asking.

    Unfortunately the worlwide headlines will be bombing in the Congress of the Philippines. Lawmaker killed.

    Great PR job for the crazies once again.

  • why? said:

    sa ibang mga comment dito pinapakita lang na how discriminating they are? kasi muslim ang namatay yun ang mga comment nila. ang mahirap kasi naniniwala tayo sa hakahaka lang? why not show some evidence that this man is really an ally of ASG? or masama siya? siguro kung hindi muslim si akbar magaganda mababasa natin dito? now i understand why our brother muslim want to be separated from the Philippines.

  • Joselito Basilio said:

    Two crimes were committed in the seats of power in two months :

    October : Bribery in Malacanang

    November : Murder in Batasan

  • The Equalizer said:

    Connect the dots…ZTE-NBN scandal…,Ayala mall bombing…impeachMe….briberies…Batasan bombing…

    where does it lead to?

  • The Equalizer said:

    Manuel: More power to your “fearless journalism”.

    Beware of Enrile ,an ageing bloodhound once again sniffing the scent of the old fox(JDV) , knowing he’s wounded, wanting to be there to assist in the kill.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Is Gov Panlilio the only one among those governors who received Malacanang Christmas bags of cash with the courage?

  • The Equalizer said:

    This is a dastardly act of terror, obviously aimed to achieve three objectives:

    1)Send a strong warning signal to Congress.

    2)Wipe out a known Abu Sayyaf supporter.

    3)Divert public attention away from other scandals.

  • micketymoc said:

    Equalizer, I’m not sure your reasons are that “obvious”. The crime and the MO can more easily be explained like this:

    1) Akbar made a lot of enemies in the ASG when he left them, and when he started oppressing ASG’s family members as Basilan governor.

    2) a remotely controlled IED is consistent with past ASG terror attacks, and seemed to have been made specifically to get Akbar.

    3) The government has little to gain and a lot to lose by pulling off something like this. Only the ASG has anything to gain from killing Akbar (Akbar is a Liberal party guy, the one that stuck with GMA).

    Occam’s Razor is a very handy tool in cases like these.

  • The Equalizer said:

    mickeytymoc: in a highly secured place like the Batasan?

  • The Equalizer said:

    http://slatev.com/player.html?id=1308174039

    let’s take a break from Philippine politics for a second.

    Watch the video on the latest Bushisms(taking the governor phone call,undressing musharaff and curing death.

    One thing I can honestly say: Bush is funnier than Gloria.In fact he reminds me more of Eraptions

  • micketymoc said:

    Yes. The “beauty” of an IED is that it can be concealed quite easily, as in this case, the gas tank of a motorcycle. The target entrance was conveniently next to the motorcycle parking area, from what I’ve heard. And judging from how perfunctory security checks are in most checkpoints, it’s not hard to believe that an operative could get a motorcycle into the complex in under two or three tries.

  • The Equalizer said:

    Manolo:I have always been fascinated by the interplay of seemingly unrelated connection events until a clear pattern emerges .My fascination with the “Connections” approach to history started when I watched the whole BBC series on “Connections” in the early 80s.

    Philippine Scenario: With this “Connection perspective”, we only have to connect the dots of the recent events to see patterns and eventually see the big picture we have all been longing for…

    * It starts with a brave journalist and his expose on ZTE.
    *”Back off!” drama in Wack Wack.
    *The emergence of a most unlikely and brave whistle blower.
    *The “Sec, may 200 ka dito” attempted bribery during a golf game in Wack Wack.
    *The Senate hearings on ZTE.
    *Neri invoking “executive” privilege as shield.
    *The proposed impeachment of Daddy chair.
    *The resignation of Daddy chair.
    *The cancellation of ZTE deal.
    *Pulido’s impeachment immunization move.
    *The attempted bribery on Cong.Beltran to support/sponsor “Impeach Me”
    *The bribery of Governors/Congressmen in Malacanang.
    *The bravery of Among Ed.
    *The hasty pardon of ERAP.
    *The Ayala “Big Fart”
    *The “Impeach Me” drama in Batasan
    *The Batasan bombing

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    equalizer, we belong to the same generation. i was also hooked on that show. but if you’re to follow “connections” you have to go further afield and not necessarily the most obvious links -you also have to take into account the law of unintended consequences.

    you would have to start, i don’t know, with the victory of fm in 1965, or somewhere else. go as far afield as iraq, etc., etc.

  • vic said:

    President Arroyo Blames Politics on the Tragic death of Ms Amper and the assassination of Comelec official Dalaig on Politics and who are “this Politics”? who lead them Politics? The President has the Majority in the House, the Local Government and awash in foreign currency remittances from OFWs, and on open loan from a very friendly neighbour China to help out the millions of Ms Ampers and to put the assassins where they belong, but it seems the problem is getting worse. The extra-judicial disappearance and killings have somehow subsided after the pressures from all sides notably from the U.N. and the Human Rights, but now the rule of the MOBs is taking over and she’s blaming herself (politics) in a way it appears she’s blameless..she had learned the tricks…

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Vic,

    Excellent assessment. Thoroughly agree with you.

  • The Equalizer said:

    manolo:the seed of her destruction as a respected national leader was planted on that fateful day she reneged on her promise to the nation NOT to run in the 2004 elections.

    It has been downhill since then,with the Garci tapes, etc. etc.etc.

    Bad karma.

  • The Equalizer said:

    In your opinion,who is the worst ever Philippine President?

    see the latest poll results in my blog

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    equalizer, nod.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “Let this day douse all rumor and speculation that this Government is divided. It is strong and focused on the business of the people. We ask our people to join us in our journey to a future of national stability, peace and solidarity.”Toting Bunye(Ops…Office of the Press Secretary)

  • supremo said:

    mlq3,

    Did you get my email with attachments? I’m talking about the JSTOR files.

  • supremo said:

    why?

    What do you know about Akbar?

  • The Equalizer said:

    supremo:“We’ll have the most progressive province in the country,” Wahab Akbar said at one rally. “When the people have dynasty, they have more development.”

    It’s the first time, however, that a man and his multiple wives have become elected officials at both the national and provincial level. Seven other politicians related to Congressman Akbar by bloodline, including a niece, nephew and several cousins, also won election victories in smaller towns around the island.” San Francisco Chronicle

    Who will continue the Akbar dynasty in Basilan?

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    supremo, yes, thanks very, very much!!!

  • Bencard said:

    mlq3, guess i spoke too soon in the preceding thread. i should have waited for you to raise the baton and predictably, as night follows day, your disciples here blare another cacophony of blame-gma villification.

    doronilla is nothing but a prophet of doom with respect to gma. he has been embarrassingly off before in his prognostications and he is wrong now. and neumann? who is neumann in philippine affairs.just where is he coming from?

    you probably find it laughable but this business of poisoning the country’s political and economic environment by indiscriminately disseminating totally unsubstantiated “scandals”, and celebrate the resulting international ‘malperception’. much has been said about filipino’s penchant for shooting themselves on the foot. i think they often do it, the media in particular, for personal political reasons, and let the country be damned. who do you think suffers?

    this is not saying that real, honest-to-goodness misbehavior should be swept under the rug for the sake of international reputation. justice, whether for or against an alleged wrongdoer, is appreciated anywhere in the civilized world. gma’s presidency ends in 2010. why is there a need to constantly inflict a blackeye internationally on the entire nation? pgma is not the philipines!

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Bencard

    What’s new? We’ve always been masochists. Panahon pa ni Marcos, Masokista na ang Pilipino. What’s sad is that these guys who always are the bearer of bad news are the first ones to leave the country for so called greener pastures anyway…di ba?

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    bencard, tsinoy, where is the black eye and where is the masochism in my entry?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    At the end of the day, the latest person to sit in Malacanang will always be the worst President to have ever sat on it…what’s new? Kaya nga pagod na ako sa kakangawa ng ating mga kababayan….as if naman kung sila ang nabibiyayaan ng mga powers that be…di sila tatahimik….

    I have always said before, our country is NOT ready for democracy. Di nga lang katanggap tanggap sa mga sumusulat sa forum na ito yung idea na yan. Ayaw pa rin nila buksan ang kanilang mga mata na ang demokrasya ay maaring lumago lamang kung may kasamang disiplina at responsibilidad ang mamamayan ukol sa kapakanan ng kanilang bansa. Eh wala nga eh…every man for himself ang nasa damdamin ng bawa’t pinoy. Huwag na tayo maging ipokrito tungkol sa bagay na ito. Iilan lang ang may tunay na pagmamahal sa Pilipinas. At di ko sinasabing kasama ako diyan. Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.

  • The Equalizer said:

    If you want to cover your ears from the reality of the world, you’ll do so at the expense of your participation in democracy. But don’t blame the messenger. …

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    When I was living abroad, I always hear bad news about our country from the foreign publications. Then, when I find out what’s really going on, I realize it’s not as bad as it is made to believe by the media.

    This is exactly the point Bencard and I are trying to make. Mountains are being made out of mole hills.

    For me, kung ganun ang bansa natin na katulad sa mga ipinagkakalat sa diyaryo, eh di dapat talaga umalis na ang mga mamamayan natin sa bansa. Wala na palang kuwentang manirahan diyan.

  • The Equalizer said:

    I have always said before, our country is NOT ready for democracy.Tsinoy

    You can always consider China.Remember 1989: Massacre in Tiananmen Square?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Covering one’s ears is different from exaggeration mi amigo. What we always hear are things that are blown out of proportion….THAT is the the problem. I am not trying to defend the regime as it really has its problems…pero again, when you hear and BELIEVE what media has to say….like I said, I would rather leave the country na nga….

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    And you actually BELIEVE that TIANANMEN SQUARE as told by Foreign media is the WHOLE STORY? The you’re really naive…..

  • The Equalizer said:

    goodbye;i hope you can bravely face the Communist tanks in Tiananmen Square like that BRAVE solitary figure in 1989.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    I guess what I am really saying is this….go ahead, talk about the problem…but please stop embellishing…seek the truth ( I do agree with you on this) but don’t just rely on what media is saying…they have their own agenda….

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    He he….well, I wanted an intelligent discussion…but I guess believing without discerning is the norm for the day….:=)

  • The Equalizer said:

    “like I said, I would rather leave the country na nga….Tsinoy”

    Nobody is stopping you from leaving this country and joining the Mainland.Take care!

    Zài jiàn !

  • The Equalizer said:

    Tsinoy:

    yǒu kōng ér cháng lái a!

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    One has to consider China’s hostory to decipher what really went on in TianAnMen Square. What you have always heard is what the Western Democracies want you to hear…..read up on CHina’s history through China’s eyes, then you’ll understand why what happened in TianAnMen happened.

    The CHinese mind is very different from the Western mind…democracy in the form presented by the Westerners is a very alien concept to the CHinese.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Equalizer, you still don’t get it….what i said was, if I start to believe everything media has to say, then you would rather leave the country….

    Obviously I don’t…which is why I am still here…:=)

  • The Equalizer said:

    I have Chinese blood just like you(and most Filipinos) BUT I am 100% Filipino in empathy with the poor.

    Do you what PAGPAG means?(It’s recycled garbage food that the poor in Payatas are eating.)

    That’s the REALITY.

    bù yuǎn sòng le.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Funny you should say that….Going to China is not exactly a bad thing. I was in CHina recently and hey, it’s not a bad place to live in…..so I guess if your subliminal racism cannot accept that a Filipino of Chinese descent can discuss the welfare of the Philippines, then so be it….

  • The Equalizer said:

    Tsinoy:I worked in China for 5 years as a GM in a large multinational.

    yī lù píng ān !

  • Mike said:

    OK, Tsinoy, you have our attention. What really happened in Tiananmen Square that merited the massacre of hundreds of protesters?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    That’s exactly the point….we should stop whining and start trying to fix the problem in our own small ways and not wait for government and the regime to fix the problem.

    Tony Meloto had the right idea with GK and I admire him for that. We have to teach the poor and the downtrodden to help THEMSELVES.

  • The Equalizer said:

    I probably have as much Chinese blood as you.Proud of my Chinese roots. BUT PROUDER about my land of birth.

    That’s why I give a damn!Actually,it’s easier to remain quiet.

    bù yuǎn sòng le.

  • Mike said:

    pgma is not the philipines! – Bencard

    EXACTLY! And that is why I support her ouster–for the good of the Philippines!

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    The Massacre was truly unfortunate. I am not saying it did not happen. What the problem was that in China’s history, quite a number of foreign powers have taken advantage of China and in fact, have tried to divide it amongst themselves. From the Chinese mind, the democratic movement was an attempt to take China apart and was not a democratic movement.

    I know this is quite a simplistic explanation but there are books available that will give you the alternative explanation. I am NOT saying it’s entirely correct. I AM saying that it must be considered.

    HOnestly, I don;t even know why this discussion came about. All I am saying is that we should be careful in discerning the news you hear from media as things tend to get exaggerated…

  • cvj said:

    I have always said before, our country is NOT ready for democracy. – Proud to be Tsinoy

    Which is why the issue of Gloria Arroyo’s cheating is not important to you. If democracy is not for us anyway, then what’s the fuss? That’s one of the pillars of the elitist mindset.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “Mountains are being made out of mole hills.”

    Whose mole?The one with mole is the PROBLEM

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    yi lu ping an too….equalizer….

  • Mike said:

    democracy in the form presented by the Westerners is a very alien concept to the CHinese. – Tsinoy

    So the Imperial Court never really went away?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Mike

    In a sense, it never did….:-)

  • The Equalizer said:

    “I have always said before, our country is NOT ready for democracy. Di nga lang katanggap tanggap sa mga sumusulat sa forum na ito yung idea na yan.”

    Maybe you are referring to your motherland

  • Madonna said:

    bencard,

    excuse me but i’m a newbie to this forum exchange — but hmmm, i have feeling that your charming naivete regarding the state of the country is because you’re not here in Pinas? are you? sounds more like you’re down with Alice in Wonderland…you know Alice really when she was there — she acted like a little tyrant and an imperialist. go read the book… it’s for adults really. peace brother

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Equalizer

    Please stop playing the racist card in this discussion. Jeez.

    MLQ3, is this a forum only for people with ONE point of view alone???? If that is the case, I will then just keep my mouth shut.

  • cvj said:

    I probably have as much Chinese blood as you. Proud of my Chinese roots. BUT PROUDER about my land of birth. – Equalizer

    As i mentioned in my blog entry, a large proportion of Filipinos (around 33%) have Chinese blood (Y-DNA M122 Haplogroup). Studies have shown that our population is most closely related to the Amis of Taiwan and the Southern Chinese. It’s just that the Binondo types and the recent immigrants from the mainland somehow want to separate themselves from the rest of the population. Must be the ‘Chinese’ mind.

  • cvj said:

    Mike, i think PTBT has been drinking from Lee Kuan Yew’s kool-aid.

  • The Equalizer said:

    It’s just that the Binondo types and the recent immigrants from the mainland somehow want to separate themselves from the rest of the population. Must be the ‘Chinese’ mind.

    CVJ:You are absolutely right.I don’t think Rizal ( and my own 100% Chinese grandfather) ever had to make a distinction and call themselves “Tsinoy” to differentiate themselves.

    We are ALL PINOYS who give a damn about our LAND OF BIRTH.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    WOW, I never realized so called democrats can really be tyrants, what with the kind of comments I see, just because someone has an alternative point of view.

    I never even realized until now that TSINOY pala is SUCH a derogatory term for the people in this forum. the fact that it just means Tsinong PINOY…with emphasis on PINOY I guess doesn’t really mean anything…I guess we 3rd generation chinese filipino don’t really have a right to an opinion..

  • The Equalizer said:

    “Senate President Manuel Villar and Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr, asked the police to dig deeper, pointing out that other personalities, aside from Akbar, were killed in the blast.

    “I think the blast was not particularly directed to a particular person. It was meant to sow fear and chaos in Congress and society,” Villar said.

    The Senate chief also said the timing of the blast raised suspicion that the incident was meant to again divert the nation’s attention from scandals hounding the Arroyo administration.”GMA NEWS

    That’s also my view.See “Connect the dots”

  • cvj said:

    WOW, I never realized so called democrats can really be tyrants, what with the kind of comments I see, just because someone has an alternative point of view. – Proud to be Tsinoy

    One thing i noticed is that those who advocate dictatorship are the most sensitive to having their opinions challenged. Must be why they instinctively prefer a dictatorship, so no one can challenge them.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “I guess we 3rd generation chinese filipino don’t really have a right to an opinion..”

    Nobody can tell you to shut up because this is still a democracy!

    That’s what we are fighting for!

  • Bencard said:

    mlq3, i was referring to the seeming tendency of philippine media, in general, of repetitiously highlighting unproven “scandals” as “facts” rather than bare allegations that they are. the usually politically-motivated accuser’s, e.g. lacson, et al., and the disgruntled “businessman’s”, e.g. jdv3, gossip-mongering can be taken with a grain of salt by a discerning public, but journalist’s spin a/k/a “educated opinion” usually acquires a life of its own through constant repetition. an irresponsible press is as dangerous to freedom as a despotic government. it doesn’t destroy democracy in one fell swoop but gradually like termites on hardwood. to me, one who repeats a canard, without qualification, is as guilty as its originator.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    “I have always said before, our country is NOT ready for democracy.” – Proud to be Tsinoy

    Question: Which country are you referring to? China or the Philippines

  • Watchful eye said:

    dodong, this “entity” who calls himself jao (i’m not sure if he is a male/female person or whatever) is doing a watchful eye- to whom i expressed disgust for making a “hypothetical” involving a close family member of mine in a gruesome criminal attack – Bencard

    Oh boy, it’s just a hypothetical, not even an allegation, and whiny benny is expressing disgust about “the seeming tendency of philippine media, in general, of repetitiously highlighting unproven “scandals” as “facts” rather than bare allegations that they are.”

    Was it an “unproven hypothetical” that was repetitiously highlighted as “facts” rather than bare allegations?

  • grd said:

    I worked in China for 5 years as a GM in a large multinational.

    is this the mind of a gm? jees

    chinoy, patience is a virtue.

  • Bencard said:

    madonna, you can review the past threads that i have participated in to see where i stand and why. yes, i live in the u.s. east coast and have done so for the last 47 years, but i have often visited “my” motherland where i still have many close relatives, fond memories, and which i consider “my” home for all time.

    when i left the philippines in 1970, the population was at approximately 45 million. there were already numerous pockets of poverty then. on a personal note, i experienced selling bottles of drinking water, and shining shoes, at train stations in bicol during my pre-teen years. i had a full-time job at the defunct phhc in quezon city at age 16, moving on to a clerical position at central post office while pursuing a diploma in journalism and law. you can just imagine the “privations” of a young working student earning 4 pesos a day for self-support (my mother was sole breadwinner, and i was fatherless since age 3).

    now the population is over 80 million in a heavily indebted country ravaged by unrelenting chain of disasters and years of government plunder and corruption. vultures in and out of the government are vying against one another in rapacity and viciousness. cynics and hypocrites, capitalizing on the atmosphere of utter hopelessness, feed on the desperation of their countrymen, not for the latter’s benefit but for their own.

    contrary to your perception, i am not exactly in “wonderland” although, compared to philippines it could be, especially politically and economically speaking. i think the average american really cares for his/her country, not just for him/herself and his/her close relatives.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “One thing i noticed is that those who advocate dictatorship are the most sensitive to having their opinions challenged. Must be why they instinctively prefer a dictatorship, so no one can challenge them.”

    This is leading out of context on Tsinoy’s comment on democracy as alien in China. China’s experience with huge tract of lands and vast resources has been subjugated by foreign powers. Foreign powers wanted to divide China for its resources. Japan entered 2nd world war to make its claim. Russia overran Manchuria. US found ingenious way of supporting the unpopular Nationalist to retain access to resources. If democracy was allowed to work in China, China would have been forever broken into pieces. The popular commnist China which is proven correct after all the years of foreign intervention is resistant to any democratic attempts in Tibet, Hongkong or any of its territory.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “Mike, i think PTBT has been drinking from Lee Kuan Yew’s kool-aid.”

    More appropriate for people who benefited from Singapore.

  • d0d0ng said:

    tsinoy on, “Eh wala nga eh…every man for himself ang nasa damdamin ng bawa’t pinoy.”

    This is understood from the view of limited resources to rapid population growth.

  • supremo said:

    “Proud to be Tsinoy :
    When I was living abroad, I always hear bad news about our country from the foreign publications. Then, when I find out what’s really going on, I realize it’s not as bad as it is made to believe by the media.

    This is exactly the point Bencard and I are trying to make. Mountains are being made out of mole hills.”

    Let’s say I’m reading a newspaper (Filipino Reporter) with news that says ‘Garbage all over Metro Manila”, I would be a little bit skeptical and check its accuracy by calling my brother in Manila.

    supremo: Marami daw basurang nakakalat diyan?

    kapatid: Hindi naman. Doon sa kanto maraming basura na hindi nakolekta noong isang linggo pa. Pero dito sa looban wala naman basura

    Basura everywhere is relative. To those living in the main street garbage is everywhere.

  • d0d0ng said:

    supremo on, “Basura everywhere is relative. To those living in the main street garbage is everywhere.”

    You can insist that way based on hypothetical. But if we apply factual event, let us pick up a neutral recent event say Glorietta BOMBING. It turned out it was explosion. But conspiracy theories abounds until facts were sorted out. That is the point of Tsinoy, to be discerning of facts.

  • inodoro ni emilie said:

    Bencard

    What’s new? We’ve always been masochists. Panahon pa ni Marcos, Masokista na ang Pilipino. What’s sad is that these guys who always are the bearer of bad news are the first ones to leave the country for so called greener pastures anyway…di ba?

    hey, bencard, is tsinoy is talking to you? better tell him then how soon you used the escape chute upon the declaration of m.l. in pursuit of the greener pasture.

  • supremo said:

    dOdOng,

    Garbage is as neutral as you can get. Glorietta bombing is not a neutral event. Itigil mo na ang pagiging pilosopo mo.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bencard calls Doronila the male cassandra but he’s forgetting that Doronila used to be one of the most trusted pressmen of Gloria — he supported her through thick and thin before, during and after the Erap impeachment until after the coup d’état in 2001. She made a semblance of rewarding him with any of the juicy ambassadorial post that Doronila wanted.

    First there was Rome, then Paris, and later on, Brussels — Doronila was waiting for the final appointment but it never came — becasue someone else (another pressman) beat Doronila to the punch every time. Gloria finally dropped Doronila and the promise of the ambassadorial post ‘for a job well done’ vanished.

    After that, Doronila became bitter so he turned around and began hitting her.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    So, Bencard, if Doronila, once Gloria’s loyal dog in the press is muck raking today, blame Gloria for it, not Manolo here! Heh!

  • mlq3 (author) said:

    tsinoy: let a thousand flowers bloom, a hundred thoughts contend, etc.

    tsinoy’s comments re: media are interesting. it’s a phenomenon i’ve noticed, too, but mainly in that nothing ever seems capable of resolution. if you leave the country and return a month later, you can pick up the paper and it would seem you’d left only yesterday. and i have had discussions with many people (foreigners) who have a grim impression of the country only to find it a delightful place (within limits).

    re: tiananmen square, it was a question of order for the politburo, and part of the dynamics that were still trying to resolve the party leadership after the twin failed experiments of the great leap forward and the cultural revolution. online, this makes for interesting reading:

    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB16/documents/index.html

    you will always have different mentalities at play in a government in times of disorder. the chinese communist party after all is a dictatorship, its utmost interest the preservation of the party’s monopoly on power. add to that the reflowering of confucian values (respect for elders, for hierarchy, etc.) and how the students challenged this, and the trauma from the cultural revolution and you can see why the students were slaughtered. in exchange, most biographies of the leading figures of the time point out the move to modernize china gained apace, which has paid off in the coastal areas. but as is given tacit recognition by the chinese communist party from time to time, conditions in the interior, including periodic protests, have created new tension.

    cjv, the “binondo” mindset is not as monolithic as some imagine and we have the best-integrated chinese population in our region, though it’s facing its own challenges today:

    http://www.pcij.org/i-report/2007/chinese.html

  • d0d0ng said:

    supremo on, “Garbage is as neutral as you can get. Glorietta bombing is not a neutral event. Itigil mo na ang pagiging pilosopo mo.”

    Again, it is explosion. There was no bomb per foreign bomb experts.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    dOdOng, Bencard, Tsinoy: exaggeration of news, conspiracy theorists, anti-govt media – these are not limited to the Philippines alone. every functioning democracy has this. it is the flagship of liberty. the freedom to say what you want even if other people don’t like it (so long as it does not trample on the rights of others or threaten their safety)

    don’t like to hear bad news? tune in to govt media stations, all you’ll hear are good news. your wish to censor speech is a desire only dictators harbor. look, a good govt will be able to turn untrue bad news and biased doomsayers into good news and believers if it just does its job and perform well. what’s the antidote to criticism? prove them wrong is all.

    when you’re standing on truth, it’s not very hard to defend your position. when you govern right, no amount of bad publicity will make people believe you’re mismanaging the country. you know why? bec your efforts will speak for itself! and you don’t even need to hire publicists and spin doctors to do the PR job for you!

    a bad product needs a good advertisement of lying to sell, while a good product needs only for people to try it out once for it to keep selling.

    and Bencard, since you’re in the US, you should know American media is worst than its Philippine counterpart.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    i am reminded of a recent pathetic effort by this admin to advertise that its trickle-up economics is bettering Filipino lives. maybe you’ve seen the TV ad i call: Damang-dama ko ang pagsisinungaling nyo!

    The ad starts with a cook talking abt her economic liberation at the hands of this admin, followed by an entreprenuer telling the viewers that business is picking up, then a med transcriptionist proclaiming his life is now easier; all of them ending their testimonials with the phrase: damang-dama ko ang pag-asenso!

    nang una kong mapanood ang ad na to, natawa lang ako. sinong bobong copywriter ang nagsulat ng ad na yan? it is so crude and so unbelieveable that the ad serves the opposite effect of what the client wants.

    my initial reaction was: pucha, damang-dama ko ang bullshit nyo.

    the ad tempts me so much to make an ad in retort to it and spoof this ad to laughable ignominy.

    i’ll start with a montage of shots of Philippine squalor, then go around Metro Manila and ask local residents there if they feel their lives are easier under the GMA admin. then end the ad with the phrase: sila na ang nagsabi, damang-dama rin nila – ang paghihirap!

    lols.

  • inodoro ni emilie said:

    devils,

    i’ll await your finish product in youtube.

  • supremo said:

    dOdOng,

    Again, itigil mo na ang pamimilosopo mo. Korni na, OA pa.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    AT least somebody got my point. I was not trying to muzzle the press. All I am saying is that I agree with Bencard that media should not be making assertions without facts to back it up. Media should also not exaggerate the facts just to sell their papers.

    Again, it’s all about being responsible. I also believe in democracy and freedom, but if there is no discipline and responsibility, then we have what we have right now. We get the kind of leadership we have been getting over the last 50 years (from FM to GMA) and we have the kind of country we now presently have….still the same feudalistic datus ruling over their natives with the occasional piece of meat thrown in to placate them. And that is what I meant when I said that people in our country are not yet ready for democracy.

    In this context, I appreciate mlq3 reaction. He made his point by discussing my idea and even directing me to a web page. Unlike some other guys who’s knee jerk reaction is just to tell me to go back to the motherland.

  • inodoro ni emilie said:

    LAHORE, Pakistan — Police in Pakistan arrested cricket legend Imran Khan and later charged him under anti-terrorism laws after he emerged from hiding to join a student protest Wednesday.

    nakit-protesta lang, terrorista na. for our enlightenment, will jihad obsessed djb explain why our anti-terrorist law not likely to fall into the same political contraption to clamp down well-meaning opposition?

  • inodoro ni emilie said:

    And that is what I meant when I said that people in our country are not yet ready for democracy.

    our people very much understand the concept of democracy. they participate in elections, and put their preferred leaders to power. you may not appreciate their choice, but hey this is how democracy works.

    what is demo-crazy is when elected leaders suddenly get amnesia and forget what they are there for: to serve the people and not their own interests. or when you have the elite few who tramples on democratic processes and decide who determines who get to sit in power, dismissing the choice of the majority. the problem therefore is not that we have a democratic system working in place but a set of people who do not know how to abide by how this system should work.

    our people not yet ready for democracy? or is it our leaders having no regard for what it means?

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    Tsinoy,

    “still the same feudalistic datus ruling over their natives with the occasional piece of meat thrown in to placate them. And that is what I meant when I said that people in our country are not yet ready for democracy.”

    Assuming your description is correct, then it seems that both sides can live with the arrangement. That, in its own way, is a demovratic arramgement.

    There is a Malay legend about this – a people were saved by a warrior. They made him king and they swore loyalty, obedience etc. but on one condition… their contract would end once he became unjust.

    Moral of the story: The essence of democracy is jusice.

    So when you say a people is not ready for democracy, you are in effect saying that people don’t know what and when they are not being governed justly.

    I think people know. I think people will not tolerate injustice. The idea that people will go along as long as they have a full stomach is a lie against humanity because it degrades us to the level of animals. It is an idea propagated by tyrants and would be tyrants.

    If injustice persists and pervades in our society, it’s not for lack of wanting to right the situation. It’s something else.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “Again, it’s all about being responsible. I also believe in democracy and freedom, but if there is no discipline and responsibility”

    I prefer an independent,”in your face ” Philippine press in a free -wheeling environment over a “suppressed” press anytime!

    Tyrants throughout history have understood that information is power, and denying information to its own people, or disseminating propaganda to the rest of the world have been trademarks for years in China.

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    The only responsibility of the press is not to lie.

  • The Equalizer said:

    The only responsibility of the press is not to lie.

    AMEN

  • tonio said:

    mlq3, equalizer:

    connections, i loved that show! it was my regular “mind stretch” :)

    MB:

    sir, you’ve used one of the most effective appeals to a Filipino male. the question is, may asim pa ba si Enrile?

  • ronin said:

    I agree with you on that point, Equalizer. I’d rather have an excessive media over an abusive government anytime.

  • qwert said:

    One thing I like about democracy is that it gives you the freedom to choose your God, in other forms of governance, the leader takes the place of God.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “you’ve used one of the most effective appeals to a Filipino male. the question is, may asim pa ba si Enrile?tonio”

    Planning to write a totally unauthorized biography of Enrile,”JPE,Bypassed by History”

  • The Equalizer said:

    “One thing I like about democracy is that it gives you the freedom to choose your God, in other forms of governance, the leader takes the place of God.Qwert”

    Kim Jong-il

  • manuelbuencamino said:

    Equalizer,

    Or maybe “The Eternal Bridesmaid” ?

    Tonio,

    Kahit siguro doon sa mga mahilig eh hindi na sasagi sa isip nila yan naisip mong itanong…hehe

  • Bencard said:

    tsinoy, i was going to respond to devils with the same line of thought but you beat me to the punch. i really don’t know if it’s bad reading comprehension, or deliberate distortion of what was said. who is “censoring” speech? until put under control by marcos during his martial law regime, philippine media was one of the most free, if not the freest. it was also one of the most irresponsible and abusive. after marcos, it was back to business as usual, with a vengeance, where one can hardly see the difference between responsible reporting and tabloid journalism. the effect in the outside world is not flattering to the filipino nation which, ironically, could be insanely sensitive, e.g., the “desperate housewives” and the kimmel “insults”. btw, i think the over reaction was more demeaning than the alleged insult, for it underscores the pinoy’s lack of self-esteem, masquerading as readiness to avenge real or imagined affronts.

    devils, if you think america’s press was worst, would that justify irresponsibility and abusive behavior in the philippine media? where is the relevance?

  • The Equalizer said:

    MB

    Heard they plan to revive the once popular TV game show “Spin A Win”.

    Conflict of interest ba if Ronnie d’ Puno becomes the show’s spinmaster?

  • tonio said:

    bencard:

    i think the average american really cares for his/her country, not just for him/herself and his/her close relatives.

    and therein lies the root of everything here in the Philippines sir. the only unfortunate thing is that it’s those kinds of people who are in power now.

    cvj, equalizer, and the rest:

    you are too quick to prosecute. what i got from tsinoy was a call for discernment, to study the “connections” of the events to everything going on around here. media should especially be suspect,especially the larger networks who see the people of this country as an audience first and as countrymen second. it totally sickens me when they engage into fabricated/exaggerated intricacies of everyday events in an effort to whip up interest in their news programming (just listen to the almost melodramatic diction of our news presenters and you’ll get what i mean), while simultaneously feeding senseless drivel and perpetuating destructive stereotypes with the rest of their local programming. makes you wanna just stick to watching cable.

    MB:

    i agree with you. the responsibility of the press is not to lie, unfortunately for many of your compatriots, simply telling the truth is not a prized skill. placing a controversial or exaggerated angle, is.

  • tonio said:

    MB:

    hehehe, well sir, kung hindi na kasi dumadaloy yung dugo ni Enrile, di na tatablan nung sinabi mo eh.

  • vic said:

    tonio, you been here, have you observed that about every media entity here in has its own Ombudsman to safeguard its integrity and entertain all complaints from the public about media misbehaviours? That’s is why we are not involve with issues like journalistic shenanigans and if their is, the remedy is the lawsuit.

  • ricelander said:

    How should the press have treated the news on, say, the “Hello Garci” scandal in the manner that should have made Bencard, PTBT, Dodong and the rest happy?

    Headline: WITHOUT PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT, ENEMIES ACCUSE GMA OF ELECTORAL FRAUD

    Using tape recordings obtained through illegal wiretapping of which possession and use in any proceedings are prohibited under Philippine law, and without any other piece of evidence to establish proof beyond reasonable doubt, members of Philippine opposition, generally known for irresponsible behavior, today accused President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo of manipulating the recent presidential elections to win…

    What about the Malacañang payoff scandal?

    Headline: WITHOUT BOTHERING TO GATHER MORE INFORMATION TO ESTABLISH PROOF BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT, PRIEST TURNED POLITICIAN REVEALS PAYOFF IN MALACAÑANG

    There, supply the body…

  • The Equalizer said:

    “while simultaneously feeding senseless drivel and perpetuating destructive stereotypes with the rest of their local programming.”

    Tonio:You are free NOT to watch.But at least in this country,people still have choices.”To each his own”.

    I still prefer free-wheeling media over STATE-Controlled media where everything is about “Good News” and “Praises “for the Maximum leader.Remember Marcos?

    BTW,ANC is not that bad with really good shows like “The Big Picture”,”The Explainer” ,”Strictly Politics”,”The World Tonight”.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “North Korea has 12 principal newspapers and 20 major periodicals, all of varying periodicity and all published in Pyongyang. Like electronic media, print media are all controlled by the state. The Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) is the sole news distributor in North Korea. Wikipedia”

    Tsinoy,old geezer:try blogging in North Korea.It’s all GOOD NEWS there.

  • micketymoc said:

    Equalizer: “I still prefer free-wheeling media over STATE-Controlled media where everything is about “Good News” and “Praises “for the Maximum leader.Remember Marcos?”

    False dichotomy there – tonio isn’t arguing that a shackled press is better than a free press. I think we’re all agreed a free press is the best option, and we’re all agreed that our press is one of the freest in SEAsia (I’ve been to Malaysia and Singapore – wow, I do not want to have a press like theirs!).

    Question is, are our newspapers and news outlets free of any agendas? Axes to grind? Filters? We have to consider that, not just the institutional agendas (business interests of newspaper owners, for example), but also the political agendas of each reporter, if any (does an unconscious radical left filter exist in reporters who graduated from schoolpapers like the Collegian?).

    Wait, there’s more. How often do the facts figure in a newspaper report, versus quotes from this source or that? A reporter with an agenda can tailor an article for one viewpoint or another by quoting one source, and leaving out another. These kinds of manipulations work even under a free press, and it’s good to be conscious of these things when they happen.

  • Bencard said:

    ricelander, i think you got the drift. crude, but with a little fine-tuning for better readability, it could work. at least, to me, it’s more factually correct. if it were up to me, i would change the text to read:

    Headline: OPPOSITION ACCUSES GMA OF ELECTORAL FRAUD

    then delete “to establish beyond reasonable doubt” from the story.

    on the alleged pay-off, i would put:

    Headline: GOVERNOR CLAIMS RECEIPT OF CASH IN MALACANANG

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Thanks micketytoc. We should look at fairplay in reporting.

    I do believe in a free press, but it should be a free and responsible press.

    Just compare the Inquirer and The Tribune and see how people can slant their stories to fit their agenda. Inquirer is a more moderate paper while the Tribune is so slanted they believe Erap is a hero rather than the scoundrel he is.

    Equalizer, I never advocated a muffled press so stop putting words in my mouth.

  • micketymoc said:

    PTBT: Yes, I understood your argument from the beginning. The press has the privilege of being free in our country, but it also has a responsibility, that it reports the facts as neutrally as possible.

    Holding a press responsible for its errors and biases is not equivalent to a shackled press.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    All this bashing against media exaggerating, making assertions, speculating, etc., etc.

    Look, the GMA Administration is a secretive, opaque regime that covers up every hole at the first whiff of a scandal. In a vacuum like that, people will naturally (with emphasis on “naturally”) speculate. Anybody who says he has not speculated is a bare-faced liar. The media is not an inanimate machine. It is made up of people who behave as normal human beings do. To expect the media, and the people at large for that matter, to keep silent in the face of a vacuum is stupidity.

    Do you think media would speculate if GMA allowed executive department officials to attend Senate hearings and tell the truth? Do you think media would speculate if this Administration allowed free access to public documents (e.g., NEDA minutes on NBN)?

    So, if this government is the object of speculations, it only has itself to blame. Not the media.

    Create a vacuum and all sorts of things will fill it in. To rage against it is futile. The only thing that will stop speculation in its track is – yes, Bencard and Tsinoy – transparency. Something Gloria does not have.

  • hvrds said:

    The free media is first and foremost a business. The freedom to publish is in the end a competitive business where if people do not buy or listen or tune in your business dies.

    Anyone who reads, listens or views the news is like a buyer of goods and services – ‘let the buyer beware’

    Since the power to communicate with the whole community endows the owners of media awesome powers varying perspectives can be gleaned from media outlets. The self interest of the owners mostly prevails in what is and what is not pursued.

    Once again most can embelish or spin the information they dessiminate.

    Anyone who reads, listens or views the news is like a buyer of goods and services – ‘let the buyer beware’

    If one wants intelligent information and discussion you will have to go to the premier news outlets in the world. In the Philippines there is only one – in my opinion – Businessweek. The rest are glorified tabloids.

    In the U.S. most Americans do not watch the public channel because there is no basic cutlture of philosophy in the U.S. You are taught to be practical and educations is narrowed on getting a skill to survive. In Europe it is different. You get both.

    Everything that is published and broadcast is decided on by a select and small group of men and women. They always will have the political economy (their own interest) in the back of their mind.

    One must not also forget that the pracrtice of law in the U.S. is adversarial. The soveriegn is the constituion. So even the government is subject to oversight by their own agencies and the other branches of the government since the actual sovereign is the U.S. Constitution.

    The push and pull between the executive and the legislature and even agencies under the executive when they challenge their commander in chef is bound by the Constituion.

    The evolution of differnet forms of authoritarian governments to this stage will take time as the principles of the individual rights, responsibilities and accountabilties of everyone under a sovereign constitution will entail a mass of the population who are economically independent and dependent on each other.

    Modern ecopnomies have evovled wherein the relationship of labor and capital is joined at the hip. One cannot exist without the other. The government should only be a referee. But how to get to that stage is the continuing struggle. Vested interest will always dictate the pace of change.

    The will always demand the status quo. That is why you have the right and left. That is the distinction that brought out the division. Left, the progreessive side for change. Right for the status quo. Hence the term the flat earth society. You can glean who belong to which side.

  • Watchful eye said:

    “I guess what I am really saying is this….go ahead, talk about the problem…but please stop embellishing…seek the truth but don’t just rely on what media is saying…they have their own agenda….” – Tsinoy

    TSINOY, IF ONLY THOSE PROUD TSINOYS LIKE YOU WILL JUST BE PROUD TO CALL THEMSELVES PINOYS, THE PROBLEM OF THE COUNTRY IS ABOUT 90 PERCENT SOLVED. IT’S NOT EVEN THE SYSTEM PER SE. IT’S THEM. THOSE PROUD TSINOYS.

    IT IS THEM TOO, THOSE PROUD TSINOYS, WHO OWN AND CONTROL THE PHLIPPINE MEDIA. CHECK IT OUT. SO WHAT ARE YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT?

    “That’s exactly the point….we should stop whining and start trying to fix the problem in our own small ways and not wait for government and the regime to fix the problem.” – Tsinoy

    THE GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIME ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM. BUT AGAIN THE MAIN PROBLEM ARE THOSE PROUD TSINOYS WHO CANNOT BE PROUD TO BE PINOYS.

    “still the same feudalistic datus ruling over their natives with the occasional piece of meat thrown in to placate them. And that is what I meant when I said that people in our country are not yet ready for democracy.” – Tsinoy

    DON’T TRY TO EMBELLISH BUT SEEK THE TRUTH. HERE’S ONE SCHOLARLY OBSERVATION FROM ROELM IN THE OTHER THREAD:

    It has been pointed out by social historians that the principalia in the late 19th century in many cases did not descend from the prehispanic chiefly class but were Chinese mestizos who rose to prominence in society starting in the 18th century. The mestizos did so by using their commercial/industrial wealth to accumulate land. The effect was probably to displace many of the remaining descendants of those prehispanic chiefs who originally accepted Spanish sovereignty. You might say the prehispanic royalty/nobility found their position dissolving under relentless socio-economic pressure. Although there was probably not much of royalty to begin with in terms of territorial jurisdiction except for the sultanates in Mindanao.”

    EQUALIZAR SAID IT BEST:

    “You are absolutely right. I don’t think Rizal (and my own 100% Chinese grandfather) ever had to make a distinction and call themselves “Tsinoy” to differentiate themselves.

    “We are ALL PINOYS who give a damn about our LAND OF BIRTH.”

    WE WILL BE READY FOR DEMOCRACY FROM OLIGOPOLY AND PLUTOCRACY IF THOSE PROUD TSINOYS WILL BE READY TO BE PROUD AS PINOYS. PERIOD.

    NOT THE GOVERNMENT, NOT THE POLITICIANS, NOT THE SYSTEM OR NOT EVEN THE PRESENT REGIME BUT THOSE PROUD TSINOYS, WHO ARE NOT PROUD PINOYS, ARE THE REAL PROBLEM OF THE COUNTRY, THE REAL ENEMY.

  • The Equalizer said:

    Question is, are our newspapers and news outlets free of any agendas? No

    A brief glance at the history of the newspaper, the profile its owners, a simple comparison of the treatment of the same news in the different papers demonstrated beyond all doubt that the constituent elements that go to make up “the newspaper” are very varied here and abroad.

    In America: Washington Times (conservative),Washington Post /New York Times (liberal)

    In the UK: a whole rainbow of political views, from extreme left , center, right, extreme right (Guardian, Times, The Observer, Independent ,Daily Telegraph)

    In The Philippines:

    Bulletin(classified ads on Sunday)
    Star (Belmonte clan)
    Manila Standard Today(Razon)
    Tribune (Ninez)
    Inquirer (Prietos)
    Malaya (Macasaet)

    I must admit I miss Chino Roces’ MANILA TIMES.

  • micketymoc said:

    I totally agree with the Shaman about Gloria’s regime being secretive, opaque, and deceptive. I also agree that we have all the leeway to speculate, and should take advantage of it.

    I would just add this caveat: speculations, particularly when done by the mainstream press, should be subjected to tests against reality. Balik tayo sa Batasan bombing: we know it’s a bomb, but can we speculate that Gloria ordered it, as some have suggested in this thread? The evidence says no.

    Evidence serves as a test in reality for any speculation, and we shouldn’t treat unfounded speculation with the same respect as speculation rooted in evidence.

    In fact, we should be suspicious of assertions made without evidence to back them up.

    Carl Sagan suggested a “Baloney Detection Kit” that can help us find the truth in any assertion; I suggest we learn to use it.

  • Bencard said:

    shaman, of course the media is free to speculate – so is everyone, including you. but whoever feeds it to the public must make it clear that it’s speculation, not a fact, and there is no available proof to substantiate it at the moment, if that is the case. it’s just a matter of being honest and fair, not deception and con artistry.

    secrecy of one party is no excuse for falsely fabricating “facts”, c’mon.

  • The Equalizer said:

    old geezer: in the real world of the Philippines,it’s hard to search for proof to substantiate everything.

    No tranparency at all.

    Executive privilege and EO 464 are used as shields for cover-ups.

    “There is one safeguard known generally to the wise, which is an advantage and security to all, but especially to democracies as against despots – suspicion.”Demosthenes

  • tonio said:

    vic:

    yup, you wouldn’t expect that sort of behaviour from the CBC, but the CBC isn’t just the government mouthpiece, it won’t hesitate to place erring MPs and other government officials in their place, albeit gently. and the media really do police themselves over there. here, well…

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    devils, if you think america’s press was worst, would that justify irresponsibility and abusive behavior in the philippine media? where is the relevance?

    of course it won’t. but im pointing out a basic thing here. if the media there is even worser than here, why are people there not asking for more moderation from these media outlets?

    perhaps bec they know that the end of democracy starts with little things. first it’s asking media to be responsible. then next, govt will define which is responsible and which isn’t irresponsible reporting. before too long, what we’ll have is a muzzled press.

    i hope you can appreciate the import of that bencard.

    our media leaves much to be desired. but it is a working media that is better left alone to evolve responsibility on their own.

    since media is consumable, then it’s up to the consumers to demand such responsibility from the seller. stop patronizing those who are obviously irresponsible.

    i’ve stopped watching GMA and ABS-CBN news. simply abominable the programming of these two. no story is followed through, and overkill in other stories. plus, they’re still at it with infotainment.

    for my news, I read inquirer. then I watch CNN and BBC.

  • micketymoc said:

    Equalizer: “in the real world of the Philippines,it’s hard to search for proof to substantiate everything.”

    That still doesn’t justify believing speculation without evidence. Besides, official cover-ups may close some areas of investigation, but they can’t close them all.

    Like I said (in a comment that’s still awaiting moderation):

    Every speculation should be tested against the evidence. Evidence serves as a test in reality, and we shouldn’t treat unfounded speculation with the same respect as speculation rooted in evidence.

    In fact, we should be suspicious of assertions made without evidence to back them up. Even if the government makes it hard to collect evidence; no excuses.

  • Beancurd said:

    Bencard, I think I know how you would headline a newstory wherein your reporter received a copy of the Garci recordings: REPORTER RECEIVES RECORDING (WHETHER ORIGINAL OR NOT IS NOT CLEAR) OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS OF TWO PERSONS (their sex cannot be ascertained from the recordings)

    But your:

    Headline: OPPOSITION ACCUSES GMA OF ELECTORAL FRAUD

    is a story about the opposition’s interpretation of the Garci Recordings not of the Garci recordings themselves.

    and you other headline:

    on the alleged pay-off, i would put:

    Headline: GOVERNOR CLAIMS RECEIPT OF CASH IN MALACANANG

    is accurate but why include Malacanang at all when it was received from somebody not from Malacanang but from another governor. But the more accurate headline would be: GOVERNOR CLAIMS RECEIPT OF CASH FROM AIDE WHO CLAIMS RECEIPT OF CASH FROM ANOTHER GOVERNOR WHEN THEY WERE IN MALACANANG

    Well, you may want to redefine what a headline is.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “no story is followed through.. DevilADV8″

    That’s also my biggest complaint!

    One-day headlines!That’s why the government moves from one mischief to another.

    We have no memory.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “Even if the government makes it hard to collect evidence; no excuses.”

    The best protection for the people is not necessarily to believe everything people tell them: Demosthenes

  • qwert said:

    “i’ve stopped watching GMA and ABS-CBN news. simply abominable the programming of these two. no story is followed through, and overkill in other stories. plus, they’re still at it with infotainment.”- devils
    __________________________

    I think part of the reason is the kind of market these networks have and it can be gauge by the commercials they show.
    CNN have 5 star hotels,airline companies,resorts,insurance,luxury cars, laptops, etc… while these local networks have shampoos,skin products,detergents, fastfood chain… etc and of course lest we forget, the political ads during election campaign.

  • cvj said:

    WE WILL BE READY FOR DEMOCRACY FROM OLIGOPOLY AND PLUTOCRACY IF THOSE PROUD TSINOYS WILL BE READY TO BE PROUD AS PINOYS. PERIOD.

    NOT THE GOVERNMENT, NOT THE POLITICIANS, NOT THE SYSTEM OR NOT EVEN THE PRESENT REGIME BUT THOSE PROUD TSINOYS, WHO ARE NOT PROUD PINOYS, ARE THE REAL PROBLEM OF THE COUNTRY, THE REAL ENEMY. – Watchful Eye

    I’ve said before that a dictatorship here in the Philippines would be worthwhile if it is used to break up (i.e. spring clean) the current elite of the country. In China, Mao destroyed the oligarchy and the warlords which paved the way for Deng’s reforms. In Vietnam, they did the same which is why we had the phenomenon of the Boat People. That cleared the decks for their subsequent take off.

    In non-communist States like Singapore, one good thing the dictator LKY did was to force integration among races in favor of a Singaporean-identity. This is done via mundane rules like quotas among various races (Chinese, Malay and Indian) in terms of housing block occupancy. Over here, a dictator should break up the ghettoes in Binondo and Greenhills. Also, s/he should imprison any ‘Tsinoy’ who is reported to be prohibiting his son/daughter from marrying a ‘Pinoy’. Any Tsinoy who leaves will of course be allowed to do so minus his capital which should stay in country for the benefit of the people.

    Then maybe the next generation would be rid of this BS dichotomy between Tsinoys/Pinoys.

  • tonio said:

    Equalizer:

    maybe i should really get cable. or just read my news on the net, as i usually do. because seriously, if you still watch local free TV, how can you take a news program that says, in the same tone, “senado inimbistiga ang bigayan sa malacañang” and “bea and john lloyd nag-aaway nga ba?”…

  • tonio said:

    cvj:

    did you court a Chinese girl and had a really great relationship, just that their parents were the problem? i did. hahahaha! i wasn’t chinese enough.

    but come on man, is it still like that nowadays?

    are the filipinos of chinese descent still the “real enemy” as watchful so loudly proclaims?

    aren’t Filipinos who aren’t afraid to trample on their countrymen for a bit of the “good life” just as much to blame?

    we are all guilty of a myopia of interests–they’re only clear so long as it involves the welfare of the small group they consider their own. it’s all just a matter of degree.

    as i told bencard though, it’s those who are hopelessly myopic who are running things, owning things, and making the most money in this place.

    too bad for the rest of us.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    Bencard,

    Speculations in the media, more often than not, come in the form of opinions based on available facts, or on allegations from one side that are not controverted by the other side. These opinions are found in editorials and columns, that’s why you find them in the “Opinion” pages of newspapers. Reporters, on the other hand, report the opinions of other people, usually public figures, and perhaps some ordinary people, if only to have a glimpse of the public pulse. Opinions are opinions and nobody can claim outright that they are “facts”, even if they are based on partial evidence. Now, if someone thinks that my opinion, for instance, all things considered, conforms to reality, I can’t blame that someone if he believes my opinion is “fact” and act on it accordingly.

    It is not necessary for media to always preface its reports or opinion pieces with phrases such as, “What I will say or report is not backed up by evidence beyond reasonable doubt.” (Do they do that in your neck of the woods?) The public is not as stupid as some people think it is to be treated so condescendingly.

    The primary responsibility of the media is to the public interest, and not to bend to the government’s will. Its main duty is to bring to the people information that impinge on public welfare. Even a government lie is information that has to be reported. For sure, a lie is not a “fact”, is it? But it has to be reported just the same.

    It is through the information that the media provides that public opinion is formed. And this public opinion is, in turn, reflected in the media. If the government wants public opinion to be on its side, it has to give out facts that the media can report, not lies. If the government wants to win the public opinion war, it has to stop being secretive and cease covering things up. Because, again, the public is not that stupid.

    In the end, the moral is: the government must promote public interest all the time, every time. That’s the only way to keep public trust.

    And if government does that, for sure, it will be reported in the media.

  • cvj said:

    did you court a Chinese girl and had a really great relationship, just that their parents were the problem? i did. hahahaha! i wasn’t chinese enough. – tonio

    tonio, my constant hanging out in the blogosphere would give you an idea on how good i am in initiating real world personal relations. Anyway, when the time comes, i’m sure a Pinoy brigade can be formed made up of disappointed would-be suitors like you to inform on misguided parents who can then be reeducated.

    are the filipinos of chinese descent still the “real enemy” as watchful so loudly proclaims? – tonio

    As i said above, a significant portion of Filipinos are of ‘Chinese’-descent since most of us came from the Mainland or Taiwan. It’s only that integration into mainstream society was disrupted during the Spanish & American periods so the latecomers haven’t been able to integrate (maybe through no fault of theirs). Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore saw that such internal-balkanization is not good for national development so he took steps to ensure integration and equity. We should do the same.

    aren’t Filipinos who aren’t afraid to trample on their countrymen for a bit of the “good life” just as much to blame? – tonio

    As far as i see, it is the elite in Wack-Wack and other enclaves who come up with self-serving deals the costs of which will be passed on to the rest of us Filipinos in the form of loans. Aside from this, who are you referring to?

    we are all guilty of a myopia of interests–they’re only clear so long as it involves the welfare of the small group they consider their own. it’s all just a matter of degree.

    as i told bencard though, it’s those who are hopelessly myopic who are running things, owning things, and making the most money in this place.- tonio

    Which is why it is time to take into account the welfare of the great majority of Filipinos. The elites have occupied their current positions of power and privilege for too long with nothing to show for it. It’s time to change that.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    “I think part of the reason is the kind of market these networks have and it can be gauge(d) by the commercials they show.
    “CNN have 5 star hotels,airline companies,resorts,insurance,luxury cars, laptops, etc… while these local networks have shampoos,skin products,detergents, fastfood chain… etc and of course lest we forget, the political ads during election campaign.” qwert

    No use complaining about the market. A vast majority of Filipinos are poor. It’s a fact of life that no one can deny. All businesses, the media networks included, always go for the largest market. No wonder, then, that you get ads in GMA and ABS-CBN for “shampoos,skin products,detergents, fastfood chain… etc.”

    Same thing with CNN. It has a particular audience, that’s why you get ads for “5 star hotels,airline companies,resorts,insurance,luxury cars, laptops, etc”.

    In other words, the networks are just acting rationally. You can’t fault them for that.

  • qwert said:

    “In other words, the networks are just acting rationally. You can’t fault them for that.”-shaman
    _________________

    Right on target Shaman, one cannot fault these media outfits. So, it is incumbent upon the government and any government for that matter to alleviate the plight of the majority of our people-the poor.Good governance equals better people equals better media.

  • enid said:

    mlq3,

    Bencard and Proud to be Tsinoy on the right and all the others on the left. Interesting divide. I wonder if it is all about the age difference, as in generation gap perhaps?

    Thanks.

  • tonio said:

    cvj:

    Which is why it is time to take into account the welfare of the great majority of Filipinos. The elites have occupied their current positions of power and privilege for too long with nothing to show for it. It’s time to change that.

    an interesting proposition… how, besides the installation of a “benevolent dictatorship” will this happen you think?

    shaman:

    In other words, the networks are just acting rationally. You can’t fault them for that.

    i can get it with the drivel on TV Shaman, I can. after all, networks have to pay they’re talents. and they are businesses after all, with a bottom line to protect, but the news? must news anchors and reporters get in on the act too?

  • cvj said:

    an interesting proposition… how, besides the installation of a “benevolent dictatorship” will this happen you think? – tonio

    The more important question is “benevolent to whom”? In my own blog entry, i distinguished between a populist dictatorship where the benefit goes to the masa and an elitist dictatorship which favors the current powers.

    As the Nigerian proverb goes “He whose head is used to open the coconut does not get to participate in the eating.” I’m not one to endorse a dictatorship, but if it ever has to come to that, you can guess whose heads i would prefer to use as coconuts.

  • tonio said:

    on a question related to the bombing, and i hope someone can give us some behavioural angle here…

    when an assassin uses a bomb, what is he saying?

  • Madonna said:

    hi there bencard,

    thanks for the backgrounder, we are both from bicol! you have a bit of nora aunor in your history — selling bottles of water at trainstations!

    re: this patriotism bit issue. i wonder if you got the patriotism bug when you moved to America, rather than when you were here in the Philippines. i think the challenge for all of us Pinoys is to develop love of country while we are here in the land of our birth, rather than developing judgmental attitudes regarding patriotism when we are safely cocooned in environments where love of country is a given. i agree with you that americans in general are a patriotic bunch — moreso than Pinoys — i say this with a bit of sadness — because historically, Americans shared a lot of historical events that united them — while we pinoys are still struggling, and the pivotal moments we had were quite hilaw or nipped in the bud — Phil. Revolution of 1896-98, Edsa I and II, etc.

    and re: alice in wonderland, i’m not referring to you being in America and it being a wonderland — i’m referring to a state of mind when a human being make pronouncements based on standards that cannot be realistically or humanely applied in a given setting. i hope you get my point.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Just a note for Proud to be Tsinoy.

    You will agree with me that compared to some of the countries around RP, Pinas is a democracy. When you say that Pinas “…is NOT ready for democracy”, it would be like you smacking yourself in the face.

    In Malaysia, Tsinoys are not treated as first class citizens the way you are treated in Pinas (because Pinas is a democracy), you will not be able to go to a Malaysian university as easily as you may in Pinas (because Pinas is a democracy), you will have to pay more for the same type of home that other non-Tsinoys of Malay stock and which you don’t have to in Pinas (because Pinas is a democracy), your children will have lesser access to opportunities and will find that many of them will have to live lives in less luxurious circumstances unless they get to be drivers or aide to foreign expats, etc. and that is because as a Tsinoy, you will be non-Bumiputra

    You will be treated a second class citizen in Malaysia even if you have been lucky enough to have the trappings of wealth and splendour because you are a Tsinoy which is absolutely the opposite in Pinas. In that sense, the Philippines is a democracy and is ready for democracy, otherwise, where would you be?

    So let’s have less of this “Philippines is not ready for democracy” crap because if Pinas were not ready, you would be considered second class and perhaps, third class citizen for being a Tsinoy just like in Malaysia.

  • The Equalizer said:

    Catch Us If You Can
    (by the Palace Gang 5)

    Here they come again, mmmm-mm-mm
    Catch us if you can, mmmm-mm-mm
    Time to get a move on, mmmm-mm-mm
    We will yell with all of our might

    * “As far as the Palace is concerned, with this impeachment issue settled, at least at the committee level, we can now move on and tackle other issues that really matter to the people,” Press Secretary and Presidential Spokesman Ignacio R. Bunye told members of the media this afternoon in Malacanang.(Press Briefing 11/15)

    Catch us if you can
    Catch us if you can
    Catch us if you can
    Catch us if you can

    * According to the President, the preoccupation with politics does not contribute to stability, policy continuity, security and peace and order that the country needs to move forward. “Indeed, it’s time for a new beginning and when we talk about a new beginning we talk about moving on,” she said.(KBP meeting 11/15)

    Now we gotta run, mmmm-mm-mm
    No more time for fun, mmmm-mm-mm
    When you’re getting angry, mmmm-mm-mm
    We will yell with all of our might

    * “Too much preoccupation with politics does not promote stability, continuity, security and order that we need to move Team Philippines forward,” Bunye said.

    Catch us if you can
    Catch us if you can
    Catch us if you can
    Catch us if you can
    Yeahhhhh

  • The Equalizer said:

    “So let’s have less of this “Philippines is not ready for democracy” crap because if Pinas were not ready, you would be considered second class and perhaps, third class citizen for being a Tsinoy just like in Malaysia.MBW”

    Well said!

  • rego said:

    of course it won’t. but im pointing out a basic thing here. if the media there is even worser than here, why are people there not asking for more moderation from these media outlets?

    Devil,

    I think its because people are more discerning in other countries like America with regards to news.

  • rego said:

    ” alice in wonderland, i’m not referring to you being in America and it being a wonderland — i’m referring to a state of mind when a human being make pronouncements based on standards that cannot be realistically or humanely applied in a given setting. i hope you get my point.”
    ——————————————————-

    Madonna,

    Are you saying Bencards advocacies are not realialistic or humane.? I dont believe so. Following the rule of law is even the easiest and practical way of getting out of this mess.

    I find bencards advocacies as principle based. Especially the principle of Justice and Fairness. And I prefer principles over morality and emotionalism. Becuase there no real yardstick for morality and emotionalism. They are highly subjective.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “I find bencards advocacies as principle based. Especially the principle of Justice and Fairness. Rego”

    “I assure my countrymen that the basic principles of justice and fairness will always be enforced without fear or favor. No one but no one can set conditions for the dispensation of justice, be he a political figure or an ordinary criminal”-GMA Press Conference, Malacanang
    April 10, 2001

    Sana nga.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Bullocks! In the absolute, justice doesn’t always go with fairness precisely because fairness is subjective.

  • The Equalizer said:

    see the results so far on the “Worst President Ever”poll

  • cvj said:

    I think its because people are more discerning in other countries like America with regards to news. – Rego

    Which is why 70% of Americans believed that Saddam was involved in 9-11. ;-)

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Spot on cvj! “Which is why 70% of Americans believed that Saddam was involved in 9-11. “

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    I think its because people are more discerning in other countries like America with regards to news.

    rego, you would be wrong w/regards to America. a large segment of that country’s population is even more brainwasher-friendly than our kababayans here.

  • Bencard said:

    shaman, just call a “speculation” speculation. is that too much to ask?

  • The Equalizer said:

    for rego and old geezer:

    A favorite bushism for you!

    “All of us in America want there to be fairness when it comes to justice.”—President George W.Bush ,Washington, D.C., Sept. 20, 2007

  • The Equalizer said:

    another one for old geezer:

    “I feel strongly that there ought to be fair justice.”—Washington, D.C., Sept. 20, 2007

  • cvj said:

    w/regards to America. a large segment of that country’s population is even more brainwasher-friendly than our kababayans here. – DevilsAdvc8

    And they don’t have the excuse of poverty or lack of schooling to fall back on.

  • The Equalizer said:

    Despite the so many similarities between Bushie and Gloria,I still see one BIG difference:

    Bushie always says the wrong things in a very sincere way(hence the funny bushisms)

    Gloria always says the right things in a very insincere way
    (hence the big credibility gap)

    Which is better ?

  • The Ca t said:

    What’s new? We’ve always been masochists.

    The correct term is micromania- a pathological disorder of self-deprecatuon or belief that someone is very small. Most Filipinos who are suffering from nearsightedness is also suffering from this illness just like concluding that all people want a military coup just because his website polled about a hundred people who said so. hohoho

  • supremo said:

    “I think its because people are more discerning in other countries like America with regards to news.”

    I totally disagree with this statement.
    Americans are not more discerning compared to other nationalities. Life in the US doesn’t revolve around politics. There are lot of things to keep Americans busy. Sports is a a good example. Football championship in January, NCAA in March, NBA in July, baseball in September. A lot of Americas play golf, bowling, tennis etc. Americans also love to drive around the US especially during the major holidays. Driving 100 miles one way is an ordinary thing here. And when Americans work, they just work. So when Bush said ‘I need to invade Iraq because of the WMD’ the ordinary American will just say ‘I’m busy finishing my basement. Here’s $1 Trillion and don’t bother me again’.

  • Madonna said:

    rego dear,

    katawa naman ang rule of law and fairness na yan — what a sorry excuse! when a pathetic head of state who also happen to be head of govt. like la gloria fails on the morality card (lying, cheating in the most brazen manner possible) — she has lost all credibility to invoke the rule of law. the rule of law in the first place is based upon premises that certain preconditions of justice (punishments for those who cheat for instance) be met. of course morality is subjective, that’s why we’re having debates eh? but they can spin all they want about moving on, that filipinos are living better now blah blah — but history will certainly mark gloria as the leader who took her being economist too seriously and in a wrong way — you know acting in way that everything/everyone has a price.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “But history will certainly mark gloria as the leader who took her being economist too seriously and in a wrong way — you know acting in way that everything/everyone has a price.madonna”

    “Dictators are rulers who always look good until the last ten minutes”

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Aha…so the real truth comes out…..that there is true reverse racism also in the Philippines! (Just read Watchful eyes comments.) Not all Tsinoys are like that. You tend to generalize. I for one believe all of the people in this forum have the Philippines’ interests foremost in their minds which is why they are reading Manolo’s works and make their comments accordingly.

    Just because I am proud of my roots doesn’t mean I don’t love the Philippines. I could’ve stayed in the US when I had the opportunity but went home (with emphasis on what my mind thinks of as home, by the way) because I do believe in the country.

    I am certainly not saying that there aren’t any bad Tsinoys out there. Nor am I saying that all Filipinos are plainly bad. It seems people here like to generalize and put words into other people’s mouths.

    It is certainly quite sad that a simple comment on why I don’t think democracy works in the present circumstance can actually turn into a racial diatribe in this forum. And I thought people are are intelligent enough to not use the racist card.

    A discussion to rebut my thesis would have been enough as what mlq3 did. But unfortunately, even the intelligent people in this forum are not really ready for democracy. Such intolerance of other people’s racial origin just proves my point.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Mr. Buencamino

    After having read your comments, I think I understand now what you guys are trying to say and agree with it to some extent.

    Tama ka about your comments below (sorry don;t know how to make quotes)

    Assuming your description is correct, then it seems that both sides can live with the arrangement. That, in its own way, is a demovratic arramgement.

    There is a Malay legend about this – a people were saved by a warrior. They made him king and they swore loyalty, obedience etc. but on one condition… their contract would end once he became unjust.

    Moral of the story: The essence of democracy is jusice.

    So when you say a people is not ready for democracy, you are in effect saying that people don’t know what and when they are not being governed justly.

    I think people know. I think people will not tolerate injustice. The idea that people will go along as long as they have a full stomach is a lie against humanity because it degrades us to the level of animals. It is an idea propagated by tyrants and would be tyrants.

    If injustice persists and pervades in our society, it’s not for lack of wanting to right the situation. It’s something else.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “The elites have occupied their current positions of power and privilege for too long with nothing to show for it. It’s time to change that.”

    There is state power of taxation. If they cheat their taxes, take their property and put them behind bars like how the US put the mobs out of business. If reputable auditing company SGV helped them, then have Phil Attorney General investigate the firm for wrongdoing and put it out of business as well like Arthur Andersen.

    Or it cannot be done because the padrino system is so ingrained across every section of Philippine society.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Hi CVJ

    Interestingly enough, inasmuch as I am being accused of wanting to have a dictatorship in our country, I am very surprised by your statement below…hmmmmm

    “I’ve said before that a dictatorship here in the Philippines would be worthwhile if it is used to break up (i.e. spring clean) the current elite of the country. In China, Mao destroyed the oligarchy and the warlords which paved the way for Deng’s reforms. In Vietnam, they did the same which is why we had the phenomenon of the Boat People. That cleared the decks for their subsequent take off.

    In non-communist States like Singapore, one good thing the dictator LKY did was to force integration among races in favor of a Singaporean-identity. This is done via mundane rules like quotas among various races (Chinese, Malay and Indian) in terms of housing block occupancy. Over here, a dictator should break up the ghettoes in Binondo and Greenhills. Also, s/he should imprison any ‘Tsinoy’ who is reported to be prohibiting his son/daughter from marrying a ‘Pinoy’. Any Tsinoy who leaves will of course be allowed to do so minus his capital which should stay in country for the benefit of the people.

    Then maybe the next generation would be rid of this BS dichotomy between Tsinoys/Pinoys.”

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    MBW

    The reason why I came up with that thesis really is that we as a collective people, (oh, kasama na ako diyan, para tumigil na yung mga racists), always seem to bitch and complain but we don’t really do anything about it.

    And if we do something about it, we get ourselves into a worse situation (ERAP, then GMA).

    Our people (as a whole, not the intellectual elites in this forum, lest I get vicious vitriols again), are always taken by the song and dance routines of these politicians. We lack discernment in that respect. We also are not responsible enough as a people to choose the right person to lead our country. We let the intellectual and capitalist elites decide what is good for our country because the collective people basically has given up that role to them. Why do I say that? They accept the padrino system in this country. They accept the system in place.

    This is not to say this group should be silent. We SHOULD make noise. But this noise should be noise that comes with reason and evidence, not speculations and innuendos.

    So am I starting to become clear now?

  • The Equalizer said:

    “I am certainly not saying that there aren’t any bad Tsinoys out there. Nor am I saying that all Filipinos are plainly bad.”

    This is the kind of statement that irritates me.You try to differentiate yourselves as Tsinoys DIFFERENT from Filipinos.As a 3rd generation Filipino with Chinese blood,start thinking as a Filipino ,period.

    Don’t accuse me again of racial slur.Far from it.I probably have as much Chinese blood as you.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Equalizer

    Then stop also using my handle as the basis of your argument. We keep going back to it. Just talk about the issues ….

  • The Equalizer said:

    “I could’ve stayed in the US when I had the opportunity but went home (with emphasis on what my mind thinks of as home, by the way) because I do believe in the country.”

    Good.fēi cháng gǎn xiè !

  • The Equalizer said:

    My friend,I will be very glad to discuss issues with you.xíng ā 。

  • d0d0ng said:

    emilie on, “our people not yet ready for democracy? or is it our leaders having no regard for what it means?”

    My own answer is both. While it true that our leaders have no shame at all on personal interest, it is also true that the people who elected local officials up to congress have not demonstrated the will to replace those who forget their duty to serve constituency interest first. The clannish family for over the years have literally dictated the outcome. Then Tsinoy is correct that Filipinos are not ready for democracy (to work – electing leaders is not enough).

  • Bencard said:

    madonna, if you have already made up your mind, based on media accounts and claims of her political enemies, that pgma committed “lying and cheating in the most brazen manner possible”, without an iota of competent evidence, then there’s no use having this debate. you believe what you want to believe, and i’m not about to prevent you from doing that, even if i can.

    the only problem with your personal “verdict” is that it doesn’t count for anything other than just another anti-gma diatribe. this is why notwithstanding your group’s constant whining, gma is still the president and all your pathetic efforts at ousting her ended up in failure after miserable failure.

    pardon my french, but i have to say it like it is!

  • The Equalizer said:

    “Then stop also using my handle as the basis of your argument. We keep going back to it. Just talk about the issues ….”

    then stop using your handle as the basis of your argument too.

    peace.

    nà jiù zhè me dìng le , kě bié fǎn huǐ hē !

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Thanks Equalizer, alam ko naman friends talaga tayo. We are all in this forum for our country’s betterment, albeit we may have different ideas on how to go about it….

  • The Equalizer said:

    old geezer:gentle reminder for you:“Dictators are rulers who always look good until the last ten minutes”

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    I never did use my handle to argue a point until somebody started it. I was just talking about my thesis and for some reason, somebody picked up my handle and attacked my racial origins….so I hope everything is now clear.

  • The Equalizer said:

    PTSP:xiè xiè , zhēn shì tai má fán nǐ le 。

  • d0d0ng said:

    devilsadvocate on, “don’t like to hear bad news? tune in to govt media stations, all you’ll hear are good news.”

    In business world, good news is not always good and bad news is not always bad. In both cases exist business opportunities. The problem is how accurate those reporting so you can have proper business decision. In the Philippine setting, there is just too much political garbage to filter out so you can look at what is realizable.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Equalizer

    I am not so good at writing pinyin….anyway…mei won ti….

  • The Equalizer said:

    PTSP:Proud to be a special Pinoy

    lái zhōng guó yī dìng yào chī jiǎo zǐ 。

  • The Equalizer said:

    old geezer likes french kiss too?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Dodong

    Thanks. You actually picked up on what I meant. It works both ways kasi for me. It’s our fault as a people why we have these kinds of leaders. The people accept them for who they are.

    It’s only when malaki na ang corruption, dun lang sila a-alma. but, why not protest against the petty corruption in their own area? Why condone such things at all?

    That’s is what I meant by the Philippines not being ready for democracy. ALl the people should be responsible to make sure it works. As of now, di ko pa rin nakikita. We still leave it to the elites to make the decisions.

  • cvj said:

    Our people (as a whole, not the intellectual elites in this forum, lest I get vicious vitriols again), are always taken by the song and dance routines of these politicians. We lack discernment in that respect. We also are not responsible enough as a people to choose the right person to lead our country. – Proud to be Tsinoy

    So you think that by calling us ‘intellectual elites’, you would be spared the vitriol? Only an elitist can think that.

    Anyway, in the matter of GMA, the masa were on to her way before the ‘intellectual elites’ had a clue.

    They accept the padrino system in this country. They accept the system in place. – - Proud to be Tsinoy

    By ‘they’, i hope you are not excluding the Tsinoys. On the eve of Erap’s election victory, Wilson Street (in Greenhills) was lined with banners Congratulating the President elect. After all, kowtowing is ingrained in the ‘Chinese mind’, isn’t it?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Equalizer

    Are you in CHina now? I will certainly look you up when I get a chance to go there….PM na lang kita. Wo di putonghua bo hen hao. Hao qio di shi chien may yo chiang putonghua le. Chia li to shi chinag Min nan hua.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    cvj

    Yes, including the Tsinoys….(pero di ako kasama diyan…I think it was Roco I voted for then….pero malayo talaga ang bilang….)

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    By the way, everybody kowtowed to Erap then siempre, nanalo siya eh….

  • cvj said:

    I voted for Lim. As it happened, the number of votes for the other candidates and against Erap was more than those who voted for him. The problem is that our system did not allow for a run-off.

    During the campaign period in 1998, i was really upset when the 30 businessmen (a number of them Tsinoys) came out in support of Erap. I thought to myself, the masa had their misguided reason for favoring Erap because they saw him as being on their side, but these businessmen should know better. They were supposed to be ‘discerning individuals’. It was plain and simple opportunism which to me is unforgivable.

  • The Equalizer said:

    old geezer: Lâche pas la patate!

  • The Equalizer said:

    cvj:I also voted for Lim.

    But ,I’m disappointed now at the way he is kowtowing to Erap.

  • cvj said:

    By the way, everybody kowtowed to Erap then siempre, nanalo siya eh…. – Proud to be Tsinoy

    What do you mean by ‘siempre’? Is that what your Chinese heritage has taught you? Or is it the businessman in you? Or both? And you blame the Pinoys for lack of discernment? I think we’re finding out who among us is ‘not ready for democracy’.

  • The Equalizer said:

    I miss ramrod.hope he comes back in this blog.

  • d0d0ng said:

    ricelander on, “How should the press have treated the news on, say, the “Hello Garci” scandal in the manner that should have made Bencard, PTBT, Dodong and the rest happy?”

    It is not a question of happiness, it is a question of right or wrong. The fundamental issue, is illegal wiretapping of President of the Philippines, military’s Commander in Chief which is treason and punishable by death. Instead the press were jumping the gun on the President. It lost the leverage on the military (if focused and prosecuted) to uncover the its role in 2004 presidential election. Huge lost opportunity.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “It is not a question of happiness, it is a question of right or wrong. ”

    Is stealing an election right or wrong?Pls answer categorically.

  • Watchful eye said:

    Tsinoy, please read my post again, not once but many times, because it specifies rather than generalizes. It says -

    IF ONLY THOSE PROUD TSINOYS LIKE YOU WILL JUST BE PROUD TO CALL THEMSELVES PINOYS

    THE MAIN PROBLEM ARE THOSE PROUD TSINOYS WHO CANNOT BE PROUD TO BE PINOYS.

    IF THOSE PROUD TSINOYS WILL BE READY TO BE PROUD AS PINOYS.

    THOSE PROUD TSINOYS, WHO ARE NOT PROUD PINOYS, ARE THE REAL PROBLEM OF THE COUNTRY, THE REAL ENEMY.

    Where is the generalization?

    If you are “proud of (your) roots” and “love the Philippines” because you are A PROUD PINOY then don’t feel guilty because I am not talking about you. You are not the problem, the enemy of the Filipinos.

    I consider Equalizer as a modern-day Rizal, a tsinoy who was a proud pinoy, and who like MBW and cvj will defend the Filipinos, the Philippines, their values and belief systems from insults and denigrations, especially if based on unfounded generalizations.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    cvj

    I meant “Dahil (not then) siempre nanalo siya.” Doesn’t mean I agree with it. It’s the reality of the situation then.

    And CVJ, just because I said we are not ready doesn’t imply I am more ready for democracy than others. I too have my baggage to deal with. I too have some discernment issues. At least I am honest enough to know I have them. I am not like some other people in this forum who feels so morally superior and so all knowing.

  • d0d0ng said:

    manuelbuencamino on, “I think people know. I think people will not tolerate injustice. The idea that people will go along as long as they have a full stomach is a lie against humanity because it degrades us to the level of animals. It is an idea propagated by tyrants and would be tyrants.”

    This probably described the current comatose – people tolerated the Congress vote on impeachment, no large people reaction nationwide as long they have full stomach. Maybe that is how they wanted it – no impeachment of the President. There is no survey if the people agree who their congressmen actions, or if they don’t, do they wanted to initiate recall as provided in the local government code.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Watchful eye

    If below is your take of me, then I fully agree. Maybe I felt being alluded to lang kasi…if it was a mistaken allusion on my part, then I am sorry….Peace bro…

    “If you are “proud of (your) roots” and “love the Philippines” because you are A PROUD PINOY then don’t feel guilty because I am not talking about you. You are not the problem, the enemy of the Filipinos.”

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Equalizer

    Stealing an election IS wrong. I agree with you on that.

  • The Equalizer said:

    PTSP:míng tiān jiàn 。

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Tsao An! Ming Tien Jian.

  • The Equalizer said:

    WE:thanks.Are you alright,sir?

  • cvj said:

    And CVJ, just because I said we are not ready doesn’t imply I am more ready for democracy than others. I too have my baggage to deal with. I too have some discernment issues. At least I am honest enough to know I have them. I am not like some other people in this forum who feels so morally superior and so all knowing. – Proud to be Tsinoy

    That’s a good admission because the reality is we all have our blind spots. Whether it’s the Bindondo crowd, the Wack-wack crowd or those from Tondo and the Provinces. The only consolation is, our blind spots are in different locations. The Upper and Middle class saw through Erap while the masa were blind to his faults. The opposite is true in the case of Gloria Arroyo where the masa instinctively did not trust her from the very beginning while many in the Upper and Middle classes are still defending her up to now.

    This is precisely the reason why we need genuine democracy, i.e. to take care of each other’s blind spots. No group or person in our Philippine society is so superior and all knowing to act as a guide. Everyone is imperfect in some way. Now a democracy only works if the process of aggregating decisions (e.g. elections) is seen to be fair and just which is why Gloria Arroyo’s subversion of that process at the highest levels is so wrong.

  • rego said:

    Tell me Madonna, have you ever lied in life? I bet you did. Not once not twice but many times over. And its teh same case with those peopel in the opposistion who is crying out loud about Glorias lies. Then if we apply your rule of morality, that makes you and all the people in the Philippines ( including me ) not so credible too. Then this forum becomes a group of people that is not credible discussant

    Now if we apply the rule law. We will be looking at the impact of that lies. And if we feel that a law is broken.Then we go to courts and file appropriate charges. The the wheel of justice will just take over. Wala na tayong pagdedeatehan pa about the issue of lying. Then we can do other things like really attending the flight of teh poor or anything that can really make these country move forward.

  • d0d0ng said:

    manuelbuencamino on, “The only responsibility of the press is not to lie.”

    Idealistic. No one measures the press to its responsibility – except for actual libel charges. The large consuming public turn to newspaper with punchline and sensational stories which drive up readerships and advertising revenues.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    CVJ

    Agree about taking care of each other’s blind spots. My point though, if you read my threads, have been about us Pinoys being blind all these years. Despite nga the fact that we’ve gone through FM, Erap and GMA, we still are truly blind. ANd that’s why I thought maybe, we aren;t ready for democracy.

    I am not saying that we shouldn’t plant the seeds. I am saying AT THIS TIME, we aren’t ready. We need to train people to be more discerning. We need to make people, especially the masses understand the implications of maintaining this feudal system. We need to make people understand what their responsibilities are in a democracy.We need to let people know they DO HAVE a stake in the system, and therefore, they SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE to make it work. As of now, that’s sense of responsibility is not in place at all.

    I never advocated a dictatorship as some people think.

  • The Equalizer said:

    “It is not a question of happiness, it is a question of right or wrong.dodong ”

    Is stealing an election right or wrong?Pls answer categorically.

    will u answer?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Responsibility entails some sacrifice on everybody’s part, and that’s where things falter for our people. Once we start talking about sacrifice, most of the time, tapos na ang boxing even without throwing the first punch. Yun ang tunay na ibig kong sabihin sa sinasabi kong di pa tayo handa sa demokrasya na iaasam nating lahat.

  • supremo said:

    dOdOng said ‘It is not a question of happiness, it is a question of right or wrong. The fundamental issue, is illegal wiretapping of President of the Philippines, military’s Commander in Chief which is treason and punishable by death.”

    Hilo ka na naman dOdOng? Wala talagang patutunguhan ang pamimilosopo mo.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “Which is why 70% of Americans believed that Saddam was involved in 9-11.”

    The decision to invade Iraq was approved by joint Congress on October 2002 based but not limited to the following, (1) non-compliance of UN resolutions, (2) alleged (not actual) weapons of mass destructions, (3) brutal repression of its people, (4) Iraq use of WMD on other nations (Iran) and on its people (Kurds & Shitte), (5) assassination attempt of president GHW Bush, (6) members of Al Queda were known to be in Iraq, (7) Iraq aiding and harboring terrorist organizations, (8) to fight terrorists including 9/11 wherever they are, (9) authority under the Constitution, (10) Iraq liberation act of 1998 to remove Saddam Hussein.

    The absence of 9/11 connectivity and lack of WMD is not enough to impeach Bush. The authority to invade Iraq is iron clad. The world perception including yours is different from the americans.

  • d0d0ng said:

    supremo on, “Wala talagang patutunguhan ang pamimilosopo mo”.

    You are free to express what you think. Thanks. However, readers can tell if you are making sense or not.

  • d0d0ng said:

    The answer to stealing election is WRONG.

    The constitution secured the right against unjust accusation, the burden is yours to prove.

  • supremo said:

    dOdOng,

    Hilo ka nga.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    In business world, good news is not always good and bad news is not always bad. In both cases exist business opportunities.

    well I am TRULY confounded now. and i thought you and bencard were ruing the bad rap our country is getting because of our “irresponsible” media “ruining” our image to other countries which is “bad for business.” and all along good news or bad news business opportunities exists… golly.

    The problem is how accurate those reporting so you can have proper business decision.

    what kind of doofus businessman relies on media news for business decisions? good businessmen rely on hard data, facts and figures – gained through research, not through media fed information. good decisions require a careful balancing act of both gut instinct and analysis of factors at play. and of course, these businessmen rely on their own network of news bringers – those who work on the ground. for all they care, our media news is just garbage to them – nothing to take seriously. all businessmen know all news are tainted with spin. it’s just a matter of who’s doing the tainting, and for what motives.

    In the Philippine setting, there is just too much political garbage to filter out so you can look at what is realizable.

    again who determines which is political garbage and which is not?

    cvj, i saw through Gloria and her mole. I voted for Roco. never mind if I knew he would lose. the important thing is I stand by my principles and don’t waste my vote.

    those who voted for Gloria just to keep FPJ away from the presidency wasted their votes.

    we can all keep touting the rule of law supreme, but when governments break the social contract which binds it to its constituents, it loses all its authority and the rule of law it keeps leaning back on is nothing but the rule of the unjust.

    the rule of law is supreme, only when it is just. there have been unjust laws written before, by men too stupid or just too evil to care – never worship the law in the letters, but only be reverent to the ideas it espouses in spirit.

    there is a reason why lawyers are portrayed in Devil’s Advocate as the heralds of Satan’s kingdom. they who twist the law to suit their own ends, their notion of justice is winning. that’s why in law schools students are not taught to aspire for justice. they are taught to be good in spotting loopholes, and then exploiting them.

    what is the law? is the sovereign supreme or is the law the master and the sovereign its servants?

    rule of law?

    yes. it will break down if those tasked to enforce it are the ones who keep flouting it to frustrate the people its supposed to serve.

    if that is the case, you can take your rule of law and stuff it down your throat. we might as well be living in the rule of the jungle.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Proud to be Tsinoy is terribly confused: When he says “Iilan lang ang may tunay na pagmamahal sa Pilipinas. At di ko sinasabing kasama ako diyan. Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.” followed later on by his equally confused statement:
    “That’s is what I meant by the Philippines not being ready for democracy.”

    Proud to be Tsinoy, ou gotta make a choice, either you give it all you’ve got to love Pinas so Pinas will be a true democracy or not but you cannot on one hand say you don’t truly love it and on one hand say that Pinas is not ready for democracy — which is it and why?

    One of your reasonis that because NOT ALL protest corruption in Pinas therefore Pinas or Pinoys are not ready for democracy is utter hogwash!

    The fact that people have a choice whether to protest or not is proof enough that Pinas is democracy. The fact that people in Pinas respect their fellow citizens who are not of the Filipino-Malay stock and treat them as equal culturally and before the law, before the Constitution is because Pinas is a democracy.

    Again, where would you be if Pinas were not a democracy? Today, you go around Pinas allowed to do whatever business you do because you are not treated second class citizen for being a proud Tsinoy. We don’t have bumiputra in Pinas — nothing of the kind you will find in RP Constitution because Pinas is a democracy.

    In the same token, I advise you to make sure of your sentiment about the Philippines, i.e., as when you say “Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.” before you continue on your personalized crusade of trying to tell Filipinos here that Pinas is not ready for democracy.

    Totally hogwash!

  • d0d0ng said:

    “I am TRULY confounded now”

    Thank you so I can explain. You are correct that business decision relies on hard data and research. Have you heard of the saying, “past performance does not guarantee results”? Direction to certain degree however can be influenced by political driven factors like increase in VAT, political clamor for BSP intervention in currency market (critical to export/import business), resistance to oil price and political decision will alter the financials of oil companies.

  • d0d0ng said:

    To deviladvocate, may I add that media influence stock market, fuels currency movement. If the strong peso continue its trend, your job in the long term might be affected. Philippine call center will lose its competitiveness in the global market.

  • supremo said:

    dOdOng said ‘Have you heard of the saying, “past performance does not guarantee results”?’

    Saying? It is a SEC requirement for investment ads with performance data to say that past performance does not guarantee results.

  • d0d0ng said:

    Another example, alarmist concern of political condition can increase insurance premium especially if there is targeted bombing of shopping malls.

    The best example is reactionary prices due to news on oil. Before local oil companies can increase the price, the small merchants have marked up their prices in advance.

  • supremo said:

    dOdOng said ‘may I add that media influence stock market, fuels currency movement.’

    Since when?

  • d0d0ng said:

    supremo on, “It is a SEC requirement for investment ads with performance data to say that past performance does not guarantee results.”

    Yes. We live by that. We do budget and forecast based on historical data and given preset conditions. Those conditions can be changed in variety of ways including political fallout.

  • supremo said:

    dOdOng said ‘If the strong peso continue its trend, your job in the long term might be affected. Philippine call center will lose its competitiveness in the global market.’

    So all the call center owners just depended on the peso-dollar exchange rate when they decided to invest in the Philippines? Ang babaw naman nila.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “So all the call center owners just depended on the peso-dollar exchange rate when they decided to invest in the Philippines? Ang babaw naman nila.”

    There is a certain threshold in currency rate, that doing business in Philippines is no longer cost effective for Call Center investment. I am not surprised anymore how business decisions are taken. It is their money.

  • supremo said:

    Do Exchange Rates Matter? from Newswise

    “Foreign exchange rate issues have become more important in recent years, especially in emerging markets, but businesses appear to look through exchange rate volatility to focus on key market opportunities, finds a new, far-ranging study released today by The Conference Board in conjunction with The Group of Thirty, a private, non-profit, international group dedicated to increasing understanding of critical global economic and financial issues.

    Global businesses take exchange rates into consideration in making investment decisions, but market opportunity, political risk, and the legal environment are all more important for foreign investment decisions than exchange rate risks………………”

  • d0d0ng said:

    thanks supremo on the links…

    If the management of Philippine call centers take hedging scheme (took options, forwards or futures contract) to manage currency risk then that will offset spike in cost of operation from peso appreciation. However, only 36% of the respondents took financial hedges.

    As long peso appreciation is close to rupee appreciation, then there is no advantage of switching investment to the competitor (India).

  • inodoro ni emilie said:

    And its teh same case with those peopel in the opposistion who is crying out loud about Glorias lies

    am not clear on this, rego: you mean the ‘opposistion’ lied about glorias(‘) lies? or the ‘opposistion’ were crying out loud that gloria lies?

    the former conjecture is bad, bad, bad, the ‘opposistion’ should never cover ‘glorias lies’, so you reckon? as to the latter, the ‘opposistion’ were exposing–by crying out loud–’glorias lies’. so where do you stand here, rego?

    move on?

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    MBW

    Where did you get the idea that I said ““Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.” ??? Stop putting words in my mouth.

    All I said was that I also have my own baggage (my own shortcomings).

    IF YOU FEEL SO SUPERIOR SUCH THAT YOU’RE SO PERFECT WHEN IT COMES TO YOUR LOVE OF COUNTRY, THEN SO BE IT.

    I read your points and some of them I do agree. You’re right that there IS democracy in the Philippines when it comes to being able to say what you have to say….but is that the only essence of democracy then?

    BTW, I never advocated censorship. I only advocated responsible journalism. I guess for you, you should be able to say anything you want,without any shred of proof except for the say so of people”.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    Just a matter of semantics, Bencard. There is a very thin line between speculation and opinion Both can have partial basis in fact. You might have even mistaken an opinion you’ve heard in the media as speculation.

    Is that all you can say? I’m quite disappointed.

  • cvj said:

    The absence of 9/11 connectivity and lack of WMD is not enough to impeach Bush. The authority to invade Iraq is iron clad. The world perception including yours is different from the americans. – D0d0ng

    Yeah, if you Americans decide among yourselves to invade, then that becomes ‘iron clad’, right? Typical.

    And then when it turns out that your 9-11 connection and WMD pretexts were bogus, you can shrug it off with a Britneyesque ‘Oops..i did it again.’ How about 1 million Iraqi killed and millions more displaced? Because of your country, it’s like the Iraqi people are having their own 9-11 every other day.

  • qwert said:

    “Where did you get the idea that I said ““Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.” ??? Stop putting words in my mouth.”-tsinoy
    November 16th, 2007 at 9:59 am
    __________________________

    Tsinoy,
    In fairness try to compare the two quotes…..

    “Iilan lang ang may tunay na pagmamahal sa Pilipinas. At di ko sinasabing kasama ako diyan. Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.”-tsinoy
    November 15th, 2007 at 1:00 am

  • qwert said:

    This is the explosion that killed the already dead pulido impeachment complaint:

    “Those who oppose the President do not trust her at all and there could be no betrayal of a trust that was never there,”- Davao City Rep. Prospero Nograles (Inquirer report)

    This congressman is betraying his own common sense…

  • The Equalizer said:

    PANTIES for PEACE!

    “You can post, deliver, or fling your panties at the closest Burmese Embassy from today. Send early, Send Often! This is your chance to use your Panty Power to take away the power from the SPDC and support the people of Burma.”

    Women in several countries have begun sending their panties to Myanmar embassies in a culturally insulting gesture of protest against the recent brutal crackdown there, a campaign supporter said Friday.

    “It’s an extremely strong message in Burmese and in all Southeast Asian culture,” said Liz Hilton, who supports an activist group that launched the “Panties for Peace” drive earlier this week.

    The group, Lanna Action for Burma, says the country’s superstitious generals, especially junta leader Gen. Than Shwe, also believe that contact with women’s underwear saps them of power.

    Should we start a “UP for Esperon” movement?(“Used Panties for Esperon”)

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    “One has to consider China’s hostory to decipher what really went on in TianAnMen Square. What you have always heard is what the Western Democracies want you to hear…..read up on CHina’s history through China’s eyes, then you’ll understand why what happened in TianAnMen happened.

    “The CHinese mind is very different from the Western mind…democracy in the form presented by the Westerners is a very alien concept to the CHinese.” – Tsinoy

    Tsinoy, I’m not Chinese, so I don’t think I can read up on China’s history through China’s eyes. Since you have a Chinese mind, please just explain to me, if you don’t mind, in simple terms, why I should not be horrified by what happened in Tiannamen Square. There’s nothing wrong in wanting to understand the Chinese mind, is there?

    By the way, please stop giving out statements like, “Iilan lang ang may tunay na pagmamahal sa Pilipinas.” Why, have you polled all 80 million Filipinos? Magagalit sa iyo niyan si Manoy Bencard (who thinks the world is just one big courtroom), saying things without evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    “Where did you get the idea that I said ““Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.” ??? Stop putting words in my mouth.”-tsinoy
    November 16th, 2007 at 9:59 am
    __________________________

    Tsinoy,
    In fairness try to compare the two quotes…..

    “Iilan lang ang may tunay na pagmamahal sa Pilipinas. At di ko sinasabing kasama ako diyan. Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.”-tsinoy
    November 15th, 2007 at 1:00 am” – qwert

    Qwert, I think you just have to understand Tsinoy. Judging by the time (November 15th, 2007 at 1:00 am) he wrote his “pag-amin”, it must have been the lateness of the hour. I’m sure he didn’t mean it.

  • qwert said:

    Shaman,
    No problem, I can understand tsinoy, I just cannot speak for MBW, the moment she reads Tsinoy’s response…

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    Say, qwert, have you heard about the latest report on the Batasan blast? It said that because of the accumulated shit inside the House over the years, there was a build-up of methane gas. It was ignited by the forceful discharge of shit from the Committee on Justice while deliberating on the Pulido impeachment complaint, causing a powerful explosion.

  • qwert said:

    Shaman,
    I did. On the other hand, did you hear the latest report about the discovery of the complete registration papers of the motorcycle used in the Batasan bombing? It was a three page document and Barias was very careful as he presented it to the media because written at the back of the pages was the Pulido impeach-me complaint.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    Yes, qwert, I did, but I want to confirm if the word “planted” was really stamped on the registration papers.

  • qwert said:

    Shaman,
    Another report to consider,the Batasan bombing was an inside job according to police authorities, they have arrested this afternoon the chef of the south lounge for two reasons.The first, serving contaminated pork to the justice committee during lunch that lead to the instant outbreak of diarrhea, the rest is history, the septic tank just cannot take it anymore. The second reason, for accidentally igniting an LPG (Liquified Politician’s Gas).

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Shaman

    Thanks for being fair. I may have miswritten the quote. Didn’t really mean to say that if that was really what I wrote. (“aminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.”)

    Regarding my other comment, it is an opinion. I am not saying that it’s true. I look at what goes on around me and reached that conclusion. You are right. I should not have phrased it as a matter of fact. It may be the case that I am just referring to what I see in Metro Manila. Peo

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Shaman

    I found na the comment. What I was really trying to say is: aaminin ko na ako rin di ako naging responsable at disiplinado. That’s what I was trying to say.

    SOrry to MBW. You are correct that I did say that. But it wasn;t what I was trying to say. Nahihilo na rin ako siguro.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    No problem, Tsinoy. It happens that we sometimes find ourselves struggling with a language that is not our first tongue.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    By the way, Tsinoy, I’m still interested to know why I should not be horrified by the Tiananmen Square incident.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    See what I meant by Proud to Be Pinoy’s being confused?

    “Where did you get the idea that I said ““Aaminin ko din na di lubos ang aking pagmamahal.” ??? Stop putting words in my mouth.”

    You have put your own words in your mouth and now you say I accuse you of putting words in your mouth?

    OK, agree you’re confused (nahihilo) so think first before you say anything else from hereon before you accuse people here of being racist because you yourself have opened the door and shown your true color.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Ooops, didn’t read Proud to be Tsinoy’s apology.

    Accepted — let’s move on.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Just a note — should read (pati tuloy ako nahilo na hehe!): “You have put your own words in your mouth and now YOU ACCUSE ME of putting words in your mouth?”

    And by way of moving last word on the issue: I sincerely hope you love the Philippines as much as the Philippines has loved you. That will be the democratic thing to do.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    Shaman

    I did not say you shouldn’t be horrified. I am just saying look at the context of what happened. It doesn’t mean what happened was right. I am just saying that one should try and understand it’s context. It was explained way long ago in the beginnings of this commentaries.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    MBW

    I wouldn’t be in this forum if I don’t love the land of my birth, which is the Philippines.(not China, mind you)

    As I sad before, all of us here ARE in here because we are interested in our country’s betterment. It’s just that we really have different ideas and opinions of what betterment is. I guess in the end, this goal we seek will probably be somewhere between what everybody’s idea of a better country will be.

    By the way, MBW, I didn’t open the door. SOmebody told me off by saying I should just go back to my motherland. That was the person who opened the door. I didn’t like that statement BECAUSE it was very racist.

    Ideas are what I came to discuss. It doesn’t mean I am always right. But explain them to me without using terms like hogwash and go back to your homeland and we should be all right.

    Shaman,

    my first mother tongue is actually tagalog. My parents then trained me to speak Minnanhua, the language of my grandparents so that they can understand me. English is actually my third language. ;-)

    Actually, I think I was really sleepy at that time and was just typing away without realizing the implication of what I was typing. Again, my apologies.

  • Bencard said:

    shaman, sorry, but there’s nothing much to say about your “dissertation”. all i am saying is call speculation and opinion for what they are. just say the word, as the case may be. that would not be too difficult, would it?

  • Bencard said:

    btw, shaman, half-truth is still false, partial fact is not truth. hope you can comprehend that.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Proud to be Tsinoy,

    “But explain them to me without using terms like hogwash and go back to your homeland and we should be all right.”

    Explained to you already why I believe Pinas is a democracy by giving you concrete, palpable comparissons, up to you to digest, that’s why I said “hogwash” to your erstwhime personal crusade of trying to indoctrinate us here that “Pinas isn’t or that Pinoys aren’t ready for democracy.”

    As to your “go back to your homeland ” thinggy — read again. Not once did I even allude to such a thing let alone told you to “go back to your homeland.”

    Baka nahihilo ka pa rin.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “And then when it turns out that your 9-11 connection and WMD pretexts were bogus, you can shrug it off with a Britneyesque ‘Oops..i did it again.’ How about 1 million Iraqi killed and millions more displaced? Because of your country, it’s like the Iraqi people are having their own 9-11 every other day.”

    Like any country, Americans decide for their own national interest based on various information. Absence of one information will not negate other information in the list of reasons that approved the war.

    Following your statement, Iraqi are having their own daily 9-11 because Al Queda decided it is the place to fight the Americans. In the same way, Philippines is having few 9-11 in the south because Afghanistan/Al Queda trained Abu Sayaf is waging its war in the South. US and Australia are providing assistance to fight against any Al Queda sponsored war might be.

  • Chabeli said:

    You know something is very wrong when the entrance of the Batasan Pambansa is bombed. Apparently, it is the first time in the history of the Philippines. Not focusing on who the target was, or even who the perpetuators were, instead, it is disturbing that there were no civil society groups who denounced the bombing really. Most of the reactions from the people were blaming Gloria’s administration for supposedly staging yet another bomb explosion–after Glorietta–so that she can declare martial law.

    It is precisely the reaction of people to the Batasan Bomb that caught my attention. Indeed, it just goes to show how much people distrust their lawmakers, with Gloria, of course, at the helm of this suspicion. This reaction should get Gloria & her minions worried. They’re sitting on a time bomb—which is the apathy of the citizenry towards government—to explode.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “They’re sitting on a time bomb—which is the apathy of the citizenry towards government—to explode.”

    That is the welcome news to those who are fed-up with the current legislators.

  • cvj said:

    Like any country, Americans decide for their own national interest based on various information. Absence of one information will not negate other information in the list of reasons that approved the war. – d0d0ng

    Of course, the fact that innocent Iraqi civilians would become collateral damage of the invasion and occupation was not a factor. You Americans now have the blood of a million dead Iraqis in your hands.

    Following your statement, Iraqi are having their own daily 9-11 because Al Queda decided it is the place to fight the Americans. – d0d0ng

    Yes, Al Qaeda went to Iraq because the Americans were there, part of the American’s logic of ‘fighting them over there, so that we won’t have to fight them over here‘. It does not matter if ‘over there‘ was actually someone else’s homeland.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    “It does not matter if ‘over there‘ was actually someone else’s homeland.” — cvj

    And to think that a couple of centuries ago Americans fought their British colonialists for the same reason the Iraqis are fighting the Americans today.

    This American bullying techniques shock even typical %British ‘imperialist’ Peregrine Worsthorne who says in his First Post UK column, “The idea of an English monarch bossing Americans became unthinkable. So has the idea of an American president bullying the leaders of Islam.”

    Worsthorne concludes with “It has become part of a vanished world. Not yet in the mind of George Bush, for sure. But then George III, too, was a slow learner.”

    Heh!

    Question that Americans should think very profoundly of: Americans didn’t want to be bossed around by their British colonialists so what makes them think that they should boss others around today?

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “Of course, the fact that innocent Iraqi civilians would become collateral damage of the invasion and occupation was not a factor. You Americans now have the blood of a million dead Iraqis in your hands.”

    Check again history if wars had changed. War is the last resort to settle conflicts. Either, you are in it or out of it.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “It does not matter if ‘over there‘ was actually someone else’s homeland.”

    That is correct, war is only defined where the combatants are. To illustrate a point, Pakistan wisely choose to abandon Taliban (harboring Al Queda) to spare the country from war.

  • Bencard said:

    i wonder what jamby’s and pimentel’s reaction would be if they survive an al quaeda-orchestrated bomb attack on the senate floor. what do you think, dean bocobo (wherever you are)?

  • d0d0ng said:

    manilabaywatch on, “Question that Americans should think very profoundly of: Americans didn’t want to be bossed around by their British colonialists so what makes them think that they should boss others around today?”

    That is odd because the last time the French president visits the White House, the French are talking tough against Iran. The French President Sarkozy did not think Americans are bossing around.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Dodong,

    Don’t be presumptuous! You don’t know what President Sarkozy was thinking. In the first place, it is not good protocol to lambast your hosts on sensitive issues right in his face (French are not Americans and do not go around spitting on his host’s face… remember when VP Al Gore lambasted Mahathir right in Malaysia, the cheek…)

    Secondly, President Sarkozy was very categorical, he said: “We are good friends and allies of America but even friends don’t always agree and America must understand this.”

    Thirdly, even before the meeting between Sarkozy and Bush, France had been advocating for a strong rhetoric against Iran’s nuclear program. If you want, Sarkozy is merely continuing his predecessor’s tough Iran policy. So why should the meeting between Sarkozy and Bush change what has been there even before the meeting. I suggest you get acquainted with French foreign policy before you raise an innuendo here.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    And Dodong, if I am not mistaken, cvj had raised the spectre of dead Iraqi civilians to satisfy Bush’s egomaniac America’s invasion of Iraq. If you don’t know it, Bush twisted and fabricated intelligence reports to fit his ambition of punishing the man who in his own words tried to kill his poor lil daddy.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    You don’t believe that Bush fabricated and twisted intel re Saddam and 9/11 connivance or Al Qaeda operating under Sadam, then read Bush’s poodle Tony Blair’s Downing Street Memos.

    Official reports leaked to the press on how Bush planned his invasion of Iraq WMDs or no WMDs…

  • d0d0ng said:

    In the same categorical statement of President Sarkozy, I echoed the same thing that French and Americans are friends even if there are disagreements.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    cvj,

    The war on Iraq has claimed not only Iraqi lives but also US soldiers who served in Iraq but have gone home…

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article2873622.ece

    More American military veterans have been committing suicide than US soldiers have been dying in Iraq, it was claimed yesterday.

    At least 6,256 US veterans took their lives in 2005, at an average of 17 a day, according to figures broadcast last night. Former servicemen are more than twice as likely than the rest of the population to commit suicide.

    Such statistics compare to the total of 3,863 American military deaths in Iraq since the invasion in 2003 – an average of 2.4 a day, according to the website ICasualties.org.

    The rate of suicides among veterans prompted claims that the US was suffering from a “mental health epidemic” – often linked to post-traumatic stress.

    Related Links
    Government ‘gave public false hopes’ on Iraq

  • d0d0ng said:

    As I replied to cvj above, congress listed all the reasons in approving the Iraq war. Intelligence information can be right or wrong. But one or two wrong information did not negate the overall authority to go to war.

    If you are correct, Democrats would have impeached Bush a long time ago.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    You are an optimist: “But one or two wrong information ” Hahah!

    Not my problem why Bush ain’t impeached … he needs all the friends he can get now more so when his term is over — people won’t forget the horrors committed by Bush, Iraqis definitely won’t.

    A wrong is wrong no matter who says or does it! The invasion of Iraq on the pretext of Saddam’s connection with 9/11 or that Iraq was stocking WMDs is just utterly, completely wrong! Again, A wrong is wrong no matter who says or does it!

  • d0d0ng said:

    In the same paper that you quoted it said, “This year General Kevin Kiley, the US Army’s Surgeon General, was among senior military officials dismissed for his role in the mistreatment of wounded veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan.”

    Returning veterans are not getting the proper mental health care that they need.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    “Returning veterans are not getting the proper mental health care that they need.”

    Not my fault nor cvj’s and definitely not the Iraqis — if evern you should blame all these things on Bush.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “A wrong is wrong no matter who says or does it! The invasion of Iraq on the pretext of Saddam’s connection with 9/11 or that Iraq was stocking WMDs is just utterly, completely wrong! Again, A wrong is wrong no matter who says or does it!”

    Excuse me, you misread the American public. It is hesitant to go to another war. But if Iran becomes nuclear, US will strike first. You should pay attention to your French president. Because his influence in European Union against Iran will bring America closer to another war.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “Not my fault nor cvj’s and definitely not the Iraqis — if evern you should blame all these things on Bush.”

    Our war is our problem, not yours.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    That’s where you’re wrong Dodong! Crimes against humanity is a problem for mankind.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    And before you get on your high horse Dodong, let me tell you that I hold an American passport and and by virtue of my possessing that document, I am considered an American, hence where America engages in crimes against humanity – I consider that an affront to me too as an American.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “That’s where you’re wrong Dodong! Crimes against humanity is a problem for mankind.”

    We need your French President to echo your statement, please. He has the power.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “I am considered an American, hence where America engages in crimes against humanity – I consider that an affront to me too as an American.”

    Then please tell me how can you indict your president for crime against humanity.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    “But if Iran becomes nuclear, US will strike first. ”

    Americans should tell Bush not to do it. Why should Bush not listen to Americans? Has Bush lost all common sense? Doesn’t he know that the will of America is paramount?

    If he refuses to listen to the voice of the American people, I suggest you guys do something drastic about it — perhaps impeach him before he does another hideos thing.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Am not interested in indicting Bush Dodong, up to those people he hoodwinked to do something about it. Those who approved of Bush’s invasion and war on Iraq should do some soul searching and take on Bush for having lied to them.

    On balance, why don’t you do that instead?

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    And Dodong, Bush is not my president, true he is president of America president but not mine — I didn’t vote for him! He may be yours but not mine.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “Americans should tell Bush not to do it. Why should Bush not listen to Americans? Has Bush lost all common sense? Doesn’t he know that the will of America is paramount? If he refuses to listen to the voice of the American people, I suggest you guys do something drastic about it — perhaps impeach him before he does another hideos thing.”

    You said you are American (dual citizenship). You should know the answer.

    In addition, majority believes in military solution in Iran according to the latest poll.

  • Manila Bay Watch said:

    Are you an American citizen Dodong?

  • d0d0ng said:

    “up to those people he hoodwinked to do something about it. Those who approved of Bush’s invasion and war on Iraq should do some soul searching and take on Bush for having lied to them.”

    When the Americans saw their soldiers dragged in Somali street, they felt they tied the hands of military with limited response in Clinton timefor too long. When they saw violence and destruction of twin towers in their city, they understood, with or without friends, that full military solution is necessary to bring war to the doorstep of sworn enemy whatever their names, wherever they maybe. So George Bush was elected twice. Today, American public believes that military solution is needed in Iran before it will become nuclear. Congress including top presidential contender Hillary Clinton is asking Bush to give them 24 hrs warning before he decide to strike.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “Are you an American citizen?”

    You can make a fair assumption as I assume you are dual French-American…

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    “I did not say you shouldn’t be horrified. I am just saying look at the context of what happened. It doesn’t mean what happened was right. I am just saying that one should try and understand it’s context. It was explained way long ago in the beginnings of this commentaries.” – Tsinoy

    The way you said it, I got the impression that you were trying to justify the massacre of peaceful demonstrators vis-a-vis the “Western” democracies’ view of it, urging us to understand it through “China’s eyes”. The massacre of unarmed, peaceful demonstrators anytime anywhere can never be understood in any context whatsoever. If a regime has a history of brutality, that history cannot be a self-justification for the regime’s behavior. History cannot be a defense for a crime against humanity.

    So, if the Tiananmen Square incident was not right, as you’ve admitted, then it was wrong, period. Never mind the “Chinese mind”.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    “btw, shaman, half-truth is still false, partial fact is not truth. hope you can comprehend that.” – Bencard

    Well, Bencard, in the very real world outside your courtroom, people do make conclusions based on whatever information is available and act on them. If they waited until all the information were in, they would wait forever.

  • Bencard said:

    no excuse, shaman. courtroom is a real world, especially if you are accused of murder or rape that you have not committed. nothing academic or make believe about that. hope you don’t face that kind of reality. making conclusions based on what “information” is available is a recipe for anarchy.

  • grd said:

    As I sad before, all of us here ARE in here because we are interested in our country’s betterment. It’s just that we really have different ideas and opinions of what betterment is. I guess in the end, this goal we seek will probably be somewhere between what everybody’s idea of a better country will be… TBT

    apparently, some people here who are judging or questioning your loyalty or love for your country (for that statement “hindi lubos ang pagmamahal”), it turns out, are not even filipinos. and they have the nerve to say how a filipino should behave and how this country should be ran. these people really amaze me no end. hypocrites.

    proud to be tsinoy, i believe you’re a true filipino for opting to stay rather than choosing to take the easy way out. i fully understand what you mean with your ideas on “Betterment” while some people here are simply fixated on politics. i myself have been tempted to leave for good on several occasions when the going gets tough, but it’s good that there’s always my wife who never failed to remind me how beautiful this country we only have. for keeping the faith that there’s always hope and a bright future for the motherland and the filipino people for as long as everybody help collectively (instead of the gloom and doom scenario others want to portray).

    gloria is not the phils. the storm will pass after 2010.

  • ay_naku said:

    gloria is not the phils. the storm will pass after 2010. – grd

    Yes, unless she attempts to hang on to power, of course. But even if she doesn’t, we’d still have to survey the damage wrecked by the monstrous storm, which will be quite massive and extensive. Damaged institutions everywhere, more entrenched corruption, lying as official govt policy, a culture of impunity, the resulting deep-seated apathy and cynicism, etc.

  • Shaman of Malilipot said:

    I’m not saying, Bencard, that the courtroom is not a reality, it has its specific purpose. But I just refuse to be governed by courtroom standards in all aspects of my life.

    It’s okay, Manoy, I’m not begrudging you your privilege to wear your legalistic straight-jacket.

  • cvj said:

    Excuse me, you misread the American public. It is hesitant to go to another war. But if Iran becomes nuclear, US will strike first. – D0d0ng

    The proven ability of Bush to manipulate the American public into going to war is one more good reason why we shouldn’t identify ourselves to closely with the Americans. We wouldn’t want a repeat of World War 2 where our country suffered because the Americans happened to be over here. Let the American’s war be their problem and let’s try to avoid becoming collateral damage to the USA’s hubris.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    pre-emptive strike policy is stupid. it makes countries like Iran want to acquire nuclear weapons to deter pre-emptive wars. stupid.

    when did Iran start aggressively pushing its nuclear program? when Bush and his damn neo-cons invaded Iraq on a flimsy claim abt WMD.

    what does this tell us? that first, if you are an oil producing country, be very afraid if all you have to deter invasion is diplomacy. with Bush and his gangsta, that won’t work.

    second, nuclear capable countries aren’t easily bullied by US as they do other countries who have no nuclear weapons. this shows that the US only respect force, and deals with other countries in a similar manner.

    it is a circular argument. the US will invade bec an obviously anti-US country cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons.

    An anti-US country will pursue those nuclear weapons bec it is afraid of being invaded by US to pre-empt its acquiring nuclear weapons.

    kinda stupid don’t you think?

    the only way to deter Iran from pursuing its nuclear weapons program is to bind the US to an international agreement that it will never invade Iran w/o UN approval, unilaterally, and violations should carry extreme punitive actions.

    as it is, the US’s pre-emptive war on Iraq has already set a very bad precedent, copied by Israel on Lebanon and will be used by other countries as pretext for territorial expansion.

    the argument is simple: are you justified to kill another man bec you think he’s looking at you in a threatening manner?

  • cvj said:

    …kinda stupid don’t you think? – Devilsadvc8

    Devils, when the Americans speak on their ‘pre-emptive strike policy’, i’m always am reminded of this quote:

    Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficent of you. -Londo Mollari (Babylon 5)

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    cvj, haha. funny – but true.

  • grd said:

    Yes, unless she attempts to hang on to power, of course. But even if she doesn’t, we’d still have to survey the damage wrecked by the monstrous storm, which will be quite massive and extensive. Damaged institutions everywhere, more entrenched corruption, lying as official govt policy, a culture of impunity, the resulting deep-seated apathy and cynicism, etc… ay_naku

    agree about the damages. stark reality isn’t it? shall we blame erap for this or should we blame ourselves for creating a monster that is gloria? i remember everyone’s patting each others back when erap was ousted through people power. but looks like it’s not going to work now. all attempts may it be legal or extra-legal has been thwarted by gloria. so our choice, either we look beyond the gloria era or we can choose to be pessimistic about it and continue with our fascination with “people power or the edsa revolution” syndrome until gloria is out of the picture.

    well, at least we have to content ourselves with the fact that we still have democracy as what MBW ardently stated.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “The proven ability of Bush to manipulate the American public into going to war is one more good reason why we shouldn’t identify ourselves to closely with the Americans. We wouldn’t want a repeat of World War 2 where our country suffered because the Americans happened to be over here. Let the American’s war be their problem and let’s try to avoid becoming collateral damage to the USA’s hubris.”

    That is incorrect. After Somalia, blown-up embassies in Africa and 9/11, the Americans wanted war and elected Bush. America did not enter WW2 even Europe was overran by Germany until the Japanese bombed Hawaii. You can be an isolationist if you wanted if you ran the country. But Philippines right now is dependent on military aid.

  • d0d0ng said:

    devilsadvocate on, “pre-emptive strike policy is stupid. it makes countries like Iran want to acquire nuclear weapons to deter pre-emptive wars. stupid.”

    When Americans watched the horrors of Pearl Harbor and 9/11, they wanted to know what the country can do to stop the carnage in our own soil. We have answer, you guess it right. Pre-emptive strike. For the Americans, there is nothing stupid in Pearl Harbor and 9/11.

  • d0d0ng said:

    devilsadvocate on, “what does this tell us? that first, if you are an oil producing country, be very afraid if all you have to deter invasion is diplomacy. with Bush and his gangsta, that won’t work.”

    There is no need for energy abundant nations like Iran and Burma to go nuclear. Everybody understood the aim of Iran including muslim nation. Saudi Arabia declared its intention this year that it will go nuclear if Iran is allowed to possess nuclear weapons because of its interest in Iraq and the region. Saudi Arabia rely solely that US can do its job.

  • d0d0ng said:

    devilsadvocate, “as it is, the US’s pre-emptive war on Iraq has already set a very bad precedent, copied by Israel on Lebanon and will be used by other countries as pretext for territorial expansion.”

    Please get your facts straight. Israel expanded its territory as bufferzone only after it was attacked by the overwhelming arab countries around.

  • cvj said:

    You can be an isolationist if you wanted if you ran the country. But Philippines right now is dependent on military aid. – d0d0ng

    Military aid is for the purpose of achieving national security. If the Philippine alliance with America results in it being involved in the latter’s wars, then such aid defeats the purpose and is not worth accepting.

    When Americans watched the horrors of Pearl Harbor and 9/11, they wanted to know what the country can do to stop the carnage in our own soil. We have answer, you guess it right. Pre-emptive strike. For the Americans, there is nothing stupid in Pearl Harbor and 9/11. – d0d0ng

    Since Iraq was not involved in 9/11, attacking that country can be compared to attacking Mexico after Pearl Harbor. You talk about the “horrors of 9/11″. What about the horrors of the American Invasion of Iraq?

    In World War 2, it was the Japanese who executed their own pre-emptive strike against the United States. That’s why (together with Hitler’s Germany) it is acknowledged to be the villains in that war. Today, the role of villain is fulfilled by the United States under Bush.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    “There is no need for energy abundant nations like Iran and Burma to go nuclear.”

    The need, dOdOng, is not for energy. But deterrence. You think when Iran has nuclear weapons the US will dare invade it like it did Iraq?

    “Please get your facts straight. Israel expanded its territory as bufferzone only after it was attacked by the overwhelming arab countries around.”

    You get your facts straight. Israel has always been attacked by everyone around them for years. And it has always tried expanding its “buffer-zone” in any way it can. walls, incursion. but it has never before declared war on the basis of a pre-emptive policy. Bush’s example has made sure that doesn’t stay the same. now any other country can justify invasion by claiming imagined threats.

    do you get the import of that?

    “Since Iraq was not involved in 9/11, attacking that country can be compared to attacking Mexico after Pearl Harbor. You talk about the “horrors of 9/11″. What about the horrors of the American Invasion of Iraq?

    In World War 2, it was the Japanese who executed their own pre-emptive strike against the United States. ”

    cvj, thank you for putting this guy in place. crazy neo-con.

  • Proud to be Tsinoy said:

    MBW

    You’re missing the point…it’s not just you. You’re not the one who started the “go back to your homeland” bit.

    ANyway, I always believe discourse can be done without having to use coarse language….

    GRD, thanks.

  • Bencard said:

    devils, will you and cvj cut the hell out of calling people who disagree with you “neo-cons” or some such perjorative names? you have been doing that like the proverbial big bully on the block with a sharp tongue but a small mind. it’s an utter waste of time debating with you and your kind.

  • cvj said:

    Bencrad, ‘Neo-cons’ is not pejorative. Ask DJB.

  • DevilsAdvc8 said:

    no cvj, it is not. “crazy” is pejorative. :D

    but the way the neo-cons have acted, you can be sure they’ve sullied that name for generations to come.

    and referring to cvj and me as “me and his kind,” isn’t exactly different Bencard.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “In World War 2, it was the Japanese who executed their own pre-emptive strike against the United States. That’s why (together with Hitler’s Germany) it is acknowledged to be the villains in that war. Today, the role of villain is fulfilled by the United States under Bush.”

    Your skewed apples/oranges comparison resulted to your distorted view of the United States. But it is easy to see through your distortions. If US is as bad as if not worse than the WW2 Japanese and Hitler Germany (giving you the benefit of doubt), why Middle East and all Arab countries, Europe, Russia and China did not join forces to fight the great villain United States? Obviously, your distorted view of the global villain US is not holding up. Please try something else other than drama or role playing.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “And it has always tried expanding its “buffer-zone” in any way it can.”

    Sorry. If your statement is true, Jordan and Saudi Arabia would be the first to say that to the United States. That is why I am saying, please check your facts.

  • d0d0ng said:

    Oh, I forgot to mention Egypt, which is across the border.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “cvj, thank you for putting this guy in place. crazy neo-con.”

    Maybe, you did not understand the neo-cons. In light of next year election, we will see the first woman US President and US Middle East policy will not change significantly. Your neo-cons concept is evidently out of place.

  • Bencard said:

    devils, if associating you with cvj was pejorative, then i would plead ‘guilty as charged’.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “Military aid is for the purpose of achieving national security. If the Philippine alliance with America results in it being involved in the latter’s wars, then such aid defeats the purpose and is not worth accepting.”

    Whose security? You know better than that. In fact, when US Congress recently announced that it would tie the aid to extrajudicial killings problems, Phil gov’t is crying out loud for split of milk.

  • d0d0ng said:

    cvj on, “What about the horrors of the American Invasion of Iraq?”

    Maybe you should ask Kuwait gov’t. whose land was invaded by Iraq. Or the Saudi gov’t. whose Sunni relatives in Iraq are direct victims of war. The Saudis warned the US it will fight the Shiites if US will leave Iraq too soon in power sharing vaccum.

  • d0d0ng said:

    “You think when Iran has nuclear weapons the US will dare invade it like it did Iraq?”

    You think US will not attack nuclear Pakistan if Musharraf pick Taliban instead of US?

    You should read Musharraf’s memoirs.

  • grd said:

    dodong, i’m interested with your take on why the US did not attack north korea (while it did not hesitate against iraq). that country has been threatening the US and its neighbors ever since with its nuclear capability. instead, the US succumbed to north korea’s blackmail and giving in to its demands.

  • cvj said:

    If US is as bad as if not worse than the WW2 Japanese and Hitler Germany (giving you the benefit of doubt), why Middle East and all Arab countries, Europe, Russia and China did not join forces to fight the great villain United States? – dOdOng

    The rest of the world (including a good portion of the American public) has expressed its opposition to the invasion of Iraq in a peaceful manner. Unlike the American aggressors, the rest of the world values the ways of peace.

    Whose security? You know better than that. In fact, when US Congress recently announced that it would tie the aid to extrajudicial killings problems, Phil gov’t is crying out loud for split of milk. – dOdOng

    You think our officials are crying because of national security? You know better than that.

    Maybe you should ask Kuwait gov’t. whose land was invaded by Iraq. – dOdOng

    With or without the American invasion, the Iraqis were no longer in a position to re-invade Kuwait after they were driven out. What additional benefit will a million dead Iraqis give them?

    Or the Saudi gov’t. whose Sunni relatives in Iraq are direct victims of war. The Saudis warned the US it will fight the Shiites if US will leave Iraq too soon in power sharing vaccum. – dOdOng

    To be more specific, the Sunnis are the direct victims of the American invasion. On the possibility of a regional or civil war in the event the US left Iraq, the United States was already warned beforehand that their presence would destabilize the region. The Americans did not listen.

  • d0d0ng said:

    grd on, “i’m interested with your take on why the US did not attack north korea (while it did not hesitate against iraq). that country has been threatening the US and its neighbors ever since with its nuclear capability. instead, the US succumbed to north korea’s blackmail and giving in to its demands.”

    There are 2 prevailing factors going on in Korean Peninsula, (1) new generation of South Korea (which is the power base of current South Korean President) has desire for reunification similar to Germany , (2) Bejing’s active role as the leading player in the six party talks to de-nuclearize North Korea. Both Bejing and South Korea President (not to give up gains in inter-Korean relations) downplayed the North Korea missile test threat and willing to take the risk. There is a clear path toward de-nuclearize North Korea. In fact, USFK is drawing down its american forces in Korean peninsula and planning to cede control of its war command authority to the deputy Korean commander. In the same way, US ceded leadership of the six party talks to China.

Leave your response!

You must be logged in to post a comment.