<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The real electoral battle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/</link>
	<description>Punditry. Politics. History. Commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ay_naku</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-486593</link>
		<dc:creator>ay_naku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 21:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-486593</guid>
		<description>Bencard, another beauty of this blog is I can respond to (or--in your words--heckle) specific people whom I choose. And right now I choose the good man from the US of A. You can choose not to pay any attention to my comments of course. But I will continue to expose your obvious biases and logical inconsistensies.

I mean, I can&#039;t &quot;heckle with my own kind&quot;, since they&#039;d be too smart for it. Better to bug someone whose arguments I can easily dismantle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bencard, another beauty of this blog is I can respond to (or&#8211;in your words&#8211;heckle) specific people whom I choose. And right now I choose the good man from the US of A. You can choose not to pay any attention to my comments of course. But I will continue to expose your obvious biases and logical inconsistensies.</p>
<p>I mean, I can&#8217;t &#8220;heckle with my own kind&#8221;, since they&#8217;d be too smart for it. Better to bug someone whose arguments I can easily dismantle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bencard</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-486412</link>
		<dc:creator>Bencard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 16:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-486412</guid>
		<description>ay-naku, the beauty of this blog is that i have the luxury of debating with whom i consider worthy of my time, when i want to. go heckle with your own kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ay-naku, the beauty of this blog is that i have the luxury of debating with whom i consider worthy of my time, when i want to. go heckle with your own kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ay_naku</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-486306</link>
		<dc:creator>ay_naku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-486306</guid>
		<description>And Bencard, please stop blabbering about political dynasties when you can&#039;t even be consistent about it. It just exposes your biases even more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Bencard, please stop blabbering about political dynasties when you can&#8217;t even be consistent about it. It just exposes your biases even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ay_naku</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-486305</link>
		<dc:creator>ay_naku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-486305</guid>
		<description>Thanks for copping out again Bencard. That&#039;s what you always do when cornered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for copping out again Bencard. That&#8217;s what you always do when cornered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bencard</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-486251</link>
		<dc:creator>Bencard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 13:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-486251</guid>
		<description>ay_naku, about the &quot;guilt&quot; of PGMA that you are blabbering about, I have debated this point, I think exhaustively, with worthy contrarians, e.g. mlq3, cvj, abe margalllo, etc.  I don&#039;t think i want to revisit those issues with you, but you may, if you want, look at the previous posts on the matter since about October 2006.

About Dato Arroyo, I&#039;m from the district of Camarines Sur that he will be representing and I&#039;m glad he won.
I don&#039;t see any problem with his joining Mikey in Congress, a much, much larger body than the senate.  Iggy is an uncle and not a direct relative of PGMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ay_naku, about the &#8220;guilt&#8221; of PGMA that you are blabbering about, I have debated this point, I think exhaustively, with worthy contrarians, e.g. mlq3, cvj, abe margalllo, etc.  I don&#8217;t think i want to revisit those issues with you, but you may, if you want, look at the previous posts on the matter since about October 2006.</p>
<p>About Dato Arroyo, I&#8217;m from the district of Camarines Sur that he will be representing and I&#8217;m glad he won.<br />
I don&#8217;t see any problem with his joining Mikey in Congress, a much, much larger body than the senate.  Iggy is an uncle and not a direct relative of PGMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rego</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-486168</link>
		<dc:creator>rego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 11:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-486168</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our elected officials are only as moral as the people responsible for putting them into office.&quot;

Bencard,

I couldn&#039;t agree for more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our elected officials are only as moral as the people responsible for putting them into office.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bencard,</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree for more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benign0</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-486078</link>
		<dc:creator>benign0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 08:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-486078</guid>
		<description>cvj, you said: &quot;Anyway, even if your sweeping generalization is true, you cannot use the masaâ€™s collective lack of self-respect as an excuse not to respect them in return&quot;.

If you recall cvj, this is what I said in my previous comment: &quot;it is easy for people like us to respect the &#039;less fortunate&#039;. [...] The real question though is this: do the Pinoy masa respect themselves?&quot;

Kung baga we in the elite constantly wax rhetoric about &quot;equality&quot;, &quot;justice&quot;, and &quot;freedom&quot; for &quot;all&quot;. But do *da masa* really comprehend (or even care to comprehend) these things?

Same with &quot;respect&quot;. We find it easy to draw on our robust ethical frameworks (honed by good upbringing, breeding, and education) to respect the least of our citizens. But put yourself in their shoes for a minute. Do you think the average kanto boy really respects other people the way we presume to?

In my experience, really rich people tend to treat their servants with far more respect that middle-to-lower-income employers of domestic help.

Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cvj, you said: &#8220;Anyway, even if your sweeping generalization is true, you cannot use the masaâ€™s collective lack of self-respect as an excuse not to respect them in return&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you recall cvj, this is what I said in my previous comment: &#8220;it is easy for people like us to respect the &#8216;less fortunate&#8217;. [...] The real question though is this: do the Pinoy masa respect themselves?&#8221;</p>
<p>Kung baga we in the elite constantly wax rhetoric about &#8220;equality&#8221;, &#8220;justice&#8221;, and &#8220;freedom&#8221; for &#8220;all&#8221;. But do *da masa* really comprehend (or even care to comprehend) these things?</p>
<p>Same with &#8220;respect&#8221;. We find it easy to draw on our robust ethical frameworks (honed by good upbringing, breeding, and education) to respect the least of our citizens. But put yourself in their shoes for a minute. Do you think the average kanto boy really respects other people the way we presume to?</p>
<p>In my experience, really rich people tend to treat their servants with far more respect that middle-to-lower-income employers of domestic help.</p>
<p>Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvj</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-485902</link>
		<dc:creator>cvj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 03:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-485902</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;the track record of the people i listed, which list, again, you deliberately omitted obviously to slant the point i was trying to make, was public knowledge...&quot; - Bencard May 19th, 2007 at 2:27 am &lt;/blockquote&gt;

It is not the &lt;i&gt;public knowledge&lt;/i&gt; aspect that i&#039;m questioning but your contention that individual morality can be aggregated into a collective morality and that this can be derived from the choices the voters make.  That would require the assumptions that i listed above, all of which do not hold.

(I ommitted your illustrative list of names you gave since i won&#039;t be party to your crude attempt to associate oppositionists with Jalosjos.)

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Even a â€œdirect democracyâ€ exercised by a majority of â€œintellectually-vacuousâ€ or morally-challenged people wouldâ€™nt work. - Bencard May 19th, 2007 at 2:27 am &lt;/blockquote&gt;

You are right to point out that direct democracy is not meant to substitute for whatever intellectual or moral deficiencies of the voters.  It is there to compensate for the weaknesses of representative democracy i.e. the failure of the representatives to truly represent the public interest.  When this happens, the people have to step in.  That is the rationale for people power and the public sphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;the track record of the people i listed, which list, again, you deliberately omitted obviously to slant the point i was trying to make, was public knowledge&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; Bencard May 19th, 2007 at 2:27 am </p></blockquote>
<p>It is not the <i>public knowledge</i> aspect that i&#8217;m questioning but your contention that individual morality can be aggregated into a collective morality and that this can be derived from the choices the voters make.  That would require the assumptions that i listed above, all of which do not hold.</p>
<p>(I ommitted your illustrative list of names you gave since i won&#8217;t be party to your crude attempt to associate oppositionists with Jalosjos.)</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Even a â€œdirect democracyâ€ exercised by a majority of â€œintellectually-vacuousâ€ or morally-challenged people wouldâ€™nt work. &#8211; Bencard May 19th, 2007 at 2:27 am </p></blockquote>
<p>You are right to point out that direct democracy is not meant to substitute for whatever intellectual or moral deficiencies of the voters.  It is there to compensate for the weaknesses of representative democracy i.e. the failure of the representatives to truly represent the public interest.  When this happens, the people have to step in.  That is the rationale for people power and the public sphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justice league</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-485863</link>
		<dc:creator>justice league</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 02:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-485863</guid>
		<description>Manolo,

I&#039;ve read your work on the &quot;Presidency project&quot;. (Sorry if I got the title wrong since I&#039;m doing this from memory)

I know that Estrada got about 39% of the vote to get elected. But is there analyses already on the distribution of votes according to class? How much of the votes for Estrada came from the masses and how much of the total votes for the Presidency came from the masses too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manolo,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read your work on the &#8220;Presidency project&#8221;. (Sorry if I got the title wrong since I&#8217;m doing this from memory)</p>
<p>I know that Estrada got about 39% of the vote to get elected. But is there analyses already on the distribution of votes according to class? How much of the votes for Estrada came from the masses and how much of the total votes for the Presidency came from the masses too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ay_naku</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/05/16/the-real-electoral-battle-to-be-updated/comment-page-3/#comment-485651</link>
		<dc:creator>ay_naku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 21:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1370#comment-485651</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;â€œLet GMA get away scot-free?â€ - ay naku.

If you get accused of murder and you are acquitted, would you like to be prosecuted for the same alleged felony again and again until your accuser, somehow find a way to convict you?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ay naku. Paano maa-acquit si GMA when she hasn&#039;t even been &quot;tried&quot; yet? She has thwarted all attempts to get the judicial ball rolling through means fair and foul -- mostly foul. She has ruthlessly used the vast powers of the presidency -- and powers that she doesn&#039;t even legally own -- to evade accountability. Ilang rebuffs na ba ang natatanggap nya from the SC? Or would you say na si GMA pa din ang tama at SC ang mali?

You call that being acquitted? Ay naku. Anyway, you are obviously partisan in favor of GMA, no matter how you try to project yourself otherwise. Kahit ano pang ebidensya ang ipakita sayo about her crimes, eh patuloy kang magbubulag-bulagan.

By the way, have you spoken out against the political dynasty of the Arroyos, with Mikey, Dato, and Iggy? I hope so, para naman di ka masyado obvious na sobrang partisan in favor of GMA. Or would you find a way to rationalize that as well? Onga pala, nabasa ko yung comment na na ok lang yung kaso ni Iggy kasi di naman sya malapit na kamag-anak ni GMA.

Well, we are all mostly partisan here anyway. Sana lang huwag na tayong magkunwari. Pro-GMA kung pro-GMA, anti kung anti. Ay naku.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>â€œLet GMA get away scot-free?â€ &#8211; ay naku.</p>
<p>If you get accused of murder and you are acquitted, would you like to be prosecuted for the same alleged felony again and again until your accuser, somehow find a way to convict you?</p></blockquote>
<p>Ay naku. Paano maa-acquit si GMA when she hasn&#8217;t even been &#8220;tried&#8221; yet? She has thwarted all attempts to get the judicial ball rolling through means fair and foul &#8212; mostly foul. She has ruthlessly used the vast powers of the presidency &#8212; and powers that she doesn&#8217;t even legally own &#8212; to evade accountability. Ilang rebuffs na ba ang natatanggap nya from the SC? Or would you say na si GMA pa din ang tama at SC ang mali?</p>
<p>You call that being acquitted? Ay naku. Anyway, you are obviously partisan in favor of GMA, no matter how you try to project yourself otherwise. Kahit ano pang ebidensya ang ipakita sayo about her crimes, eh patuloy kang magbubulag-bulagan.</p>
<p>By the way, have you spoken out against the political dynasty of the Arroyos, with Mikey, Dato, and Iggy? I hope so, para naman di ka masyado obvious na sobrang partisan in favor of GMA. Or would you find a way to rationalize that as well? Onga pala, nabasa ko yung comment na na ok lang yung kaso ni Iggy kasi di naman sya malapit na kamag-anak ni GMA.</p>
<p>Well, we are all mostly partisan here anyway. Sana lang huwag na tayong magkunwari. Pro-GMA kung pro-GMA, anti kung anti. Ay naku.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
