<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philippine political culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/</link>
	<description>Punditry. Politics. History. Commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel L. Quezon III &#124; Some Readings as the Constitution turns 25</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1086724</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel L. Quezon III &#124; Some Readings as the Constitution turns 25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-1086724</guid>
		<description>[...] and substance and Credentialing democracy: or, the institutionalization of “balato”, and also, Philippine political culture, in this blog. Also, my columns, The Philippines is OK and A more balanced [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and substance and Credentialing democracy: or, the institutionalization of “balato”, and also, Philippine political culture, in this blog. Also, my columns, The Philippines is OK and A more balanced [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Government by the people &#124; Filipino Voices</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1042235</link>
		<dc:creator>Government by the people &#124; Filipino Voices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-1042235</guid>
		<description>[...] a select group of individuals, the â€œguardians,â€ if you will, in Platonic discourse, or the â€œmoral and intellectual aristocracyâ€ according to Filipino politician and jurist Jose P. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a select group of individuals, the â€œguardians,â€ if you will, in Platonic discourse, or the â€œmoral and intellectual aristocracyâ€ according to Filipino politician and jurist Jose P. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on stillborn revolutions : Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1025252</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on stillborn revolutions : Manuel L. Quezon III: The Daily Dose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-1025252</guid>
		<description>[...] Some links to past readings by way of a backgrounder on the Marcos years and the anniversary of the Edsa Revolution: Marcos in retrospect, part 1 and part 2; the enduring strength of the idea that one can create a New Society; and some observations on the Philippine political culture. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some links to past readings by way of a backgrounder on the Marcos years and the anniversary of the Edsa Revolution: Marcos in retrospect, part 1 and part 2; the enduring strength of the idea that one can create a New Society; and some observations on the Philippine political culture. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Current &#187; Thoughts on stillborn revolutions</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1025251</link>
		<dc:creator>Current &#187; Thoughts on stillborn revolutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-1025251</guid>
		<description>[...] Some links to past readings by way of a backgrounder on the Marcos years and the anniversary of the Edsa Revolution: Marcos in retrospect, part 1 and part 2; the enduring strength of the idea that one can create a New Society; and some observations on the Philippine political culture. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some links to past readings by way of a backgrounder on the Marcos years and the anniversary of the Edsa Revolution: Marcos in retrospect, part 1 and part 2; the enduring strength of the idea that one can create a New Society; and some observations on the Philippine political culture. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivy tumakay</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1000436</link>
		<dc:creator>ivy tumakay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-1000436</guid>
		<description>are we really democratic?or we&#039;re still in the  process of establishing democracy?
It&#039;s quite clear,indeed, that Philippines is neither democratic nor undemocratic by substance and in form,but rather, Philippines is still struggling for democratization.

This country has never been ideal for those who had been deprived of their rights..because admittedly,we are dominated by elite families who have gone thru a lot of years in manipulating us,even in the electoral process...Those landlords or landowners who are presumed to have the capacity and ofcourse,the RESOURCES  to run for an office are just playing safe!
they took power in order to sustain,retain and expand their interests,unfortunately..that is the reality! 

now, are we democratic? or it&#039;s just a defense mechanism for those who are in power?

reflect,then ask yourselves!

godbless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are we really democratic?or we&#8217;re still in the  process of establishing democracy?<br />
It&#8217;s quite clear,indeed, that Philippines is neither democratic nor undemocratic by substance and in form,but rather, Philippines is still struggling for democratization.</p>
<p>This country has never been ideal for those who had been deprived of their rights..because admittedly,we are dominated by elite families who have gone thru a lot of years in manipulating us,even in the electoral process&#8230;Those landlords or landowners who are presumed to have the capacity and ofcourse,the RESOURCES  to run for an office are just playing safe!<br />
they took power in order to sustain,retain and expand their interests,unfortunately..that is the reality! </p>
<p>now, are we democratic? or it&#8217;s just a defense mechanism for those who are in power?</p>
<p>reflect,then ask yourselves!</p>
<p>godbless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pyk</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-670053</link>
		<dc:creator>pyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-670053</guid>
		<description>i conform with Jose P.Laurel (and Marcos). 

aristocracy is probably more effective and i believe to be the natural order. 

look on the animal kingdom. peaceful coexistence only happens when one rules the group (say, alpha dog for a pack, queen bee for a swarm, queen for the army of ants etc etc)

and look at how the oldest (the most sustainable) organizations on Earth were managed - Church, the Muslims, military, chinese business, monarchs and even the Apostles, etc etc. are they in &quot;democratic form&quot;?  

i however believe in the democratic dynamics specifically in &quot;grabbing solutions through collective effort (or we say teamwork) effort&quot; but, i think, the majority (or the followers) had gone &quot;democrazy&quot; and exceeded their role/contribution in nation-building, likely leveling up with the leaders who are intellectually superior than the majority. 

even in little classroom teams, when everybody gets his/her ideas imposed and be adopted, the team project often ends up with an average or failing grade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i conform with Jose P.Laurel (and Marcos). </p>
<p>aristocracy is probably more effective and i believe to be the natural order. </p>
<p>look on the animal kingdom. peaceful coexistence only happens when one rules the group (say, alpha dog for a pack, queen bee for a swarm, queen for the army of ants etc etc)</p>
<p>and look at how the oldest (the most sustainable) organizations on Earth were managed &#8211; Church, the Muslims, military, chinese business, monarchs and even the Apostles, etc etc. are they in &#8220;democratic form&#8221;?  </p>
<p>i however believe in the democratic dynamics specifically in &#8220;grabbing solutions through collective effort (or we say teamwork) effort&#8221; but, i think, the majority (or the followers) had gone &#8220;democrazy&#8221; and exceeded their role/contribution in nation-building, likely leveling up with the leaders who are intellectually superior than the majority. </p>
<p>even in little classroom teams, when everybody gets his/her ideas imposed and be adopted, the team project often ends up with an average or failing grade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvj</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-432080</link>
		<dc:creator>cvj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-432080</guid>
		<description>Bencard, for some reason, my bringing up the word &#039;internet brigadier&#039; has been eating at you.  I wonder why...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bencard, for some reason, my bringing up the word &#8216;internet brigadier&#8217; has been eating at you.  I wonder why&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bencard</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-431466</link>
		<dc:creator>Bencard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-431466</guid>
		<description>so, welcome to Earth, you naive &quot;martians&quot; who are. or pretending to be clueless as to why there is evil in this world. Not much comment on this topic of yours, huh, mlq3, except from your &quot;in-house&quot; rat pacer (and of course, this one &quot;internet brigadier&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, welcome to Earth, you naive &#8220;martians&#8221; who are. or pretending to be clueless as to why there is evil in this world. Not much comment on this topic of yours, huh, mlq3, except from your &#8220;in-house&#8221; rat pacer (and of course, this one &#8220;internet brigadier&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cvj</title>
		<link>http://www.quezon.ph/2007/02/20/philippine-political-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-428815</link>
		<dc:creator>cvj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quezon.ph/?p=1161#comment-428815</guid>
		<description>I bet Jose P. Laurel would have hated the concept of wikipedia.  Anyway, he does not have the benefit of history since World War 2 to learn from.  He can still be forgiven the naivete of leaving government in the hands of experts and technocrats. We no longer have such an excuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Jose P. Laurel would have hated the concept of wikipedia.  Anyway, he does not have the benefit of history since World War 2 to learn from.  He can still be forgiven the naivete of leaving government in the hands of experts and technocrats. We no longer have such an excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

