TheSaturday’s Inquirer editorial pointed out why the executive was wrong and where Philippine courts have been rather wimpy; the editorial quotes the Court of Appeals which said the VFA is not a “legal shield” for American troops, it is protection for the Philippines from foreign troops; though this is not how most people would understand it or even how the Senate understood it when it ratified the agreement.Iloilo City Boy has a fascinating entry on public support for the Visiting Forces Agreement and the Senate debates on it prior to its ratification…. As the editorial put it,As Undersecretary Zosimo Paredes, the often-criticized official responsible for overseeing the Philippine-US Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA), correctly said yesterday: The Palace took the law into its own hands…. By effecting the transfer, stealthily and without a court order, the executive violated the law it was sworn to serve.TheThe Bunker Chronicles proposes a price rollback instead of a wage hike.
