This is just another weak attempt to form something out of nothing, an entity with a hollow core..

I agree. But I don’t expect Basang Panaginip to be able to answer that way.

If the british boys and Bryanboy are right, then why should Simonton’s co-workers not be right also?

justice league, i think it depends on historical and social context i.e., whether the object of an insult is part of a dominant or a dominated group. the power relations between men/women, hetero/homo, religious/atheist, christian/muslim, white/black can be described as that between the oppressor and the oppressed. homosexuals, muslims and blacks have, as a group, been on the receiving end of oppression therefore to insult them on that basis is wrong. heteros, christians and whites, on the other hand, are part of the ruling establishment so they have to be more careful with what they say. That explains the lack of symmetry.

Pagalingan na lang dapat ng pangiinsulto!

You’re right, execution matters. That would explain Borat the movie.

The blog linked to other bloggers as well.

Frequently seen is the defense that it is free speech, freedom of expression and the right to it.

Left in the background is whether it was “right” or correct.

People who see that it was right to do so should read the case of Dwayne SIMONTON in the case of Simonton v. Runyon, 232 F.3d 33 (2nd Cir. 2000)

He was a homosexual and he endured hardships for it in his workplace. Hardships of insults and discrimination for which he would be denied justice.

Most of the people on the side of the Bryanboy issue are said to be liberals.

But such people should also claim that it is but only “right” that Dwayne Simonton be denied justice and that a law that would enable people like Simonton to receive justice be forever prevented from seeing the light of day.

Laws against discrimination should never be enacted or at least be dismantled if already inplace if such should be the case.

For to be truly liberal about it; no rules should be enforced to prevent what insults or discrimination we want to cast on anyone.

If the british boys and Bryanboy are right, then why should Simonton’s co-workers not be right also?

Pagalingan na lang dapat ng pangiinsulto!

a. fors (o-oo kay arroyo), or
b. againsts (a-ayoko kay arroyo).

however, a

c. none-of-the-above force

is in the offing and, as reports would say, endorsements from either “the fors” or “the againsts” are welcome to them. now, even a

d. moral force

could sprout…but that’s according to only one oppositionist in the person of tatad…(who, incidentally, i find to be a loathsome Eddie* in the opposition.)

well, i may not be happy that this race will not just be a one-on-one affair but i just hope that there’ll be no overlapping endorsements. i am rooting for candidates who are “arroyo-AGAINSTS”…regardless of their ticket. any candidate from “the fors” and those whose convictions are suspect (like angara and recto) i would certainly eliminate!

—–

*Eddie – a person being left out in a group, e.g., the senatoriables:

“Papaano naman si Eddie?,” asked Tatad. “Sino’ng Eddie?, Binay answered.” Tatad sheepishly replied, “Eh, di…ako.”