Comments on: The President wears Prada

By: Evening Dresses

Evening Dresses — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:28:47 +0000

Really these dresses are lovely and beautiful.
I think these dresses are very hot. Thanks a lot. : lol:

By: joan

joan — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:13:49 +0000

putang ina mo mamatay ka na manuel l quezon university

By: ca corona house new

ca corona house new — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:25:33 +0000

ca corona house new…

From House to Home:. Texas House….

By: hbrpgaftra

hbrpgaftra — Sun, 27 May 2007 14:03:07 +0000

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! wdcxjvejwywxwh

By: anna de brux

anna de brux — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:04:22 +0000

Who says about affecting Jerry Falwell, Gary Bauer, much less Texas-based preacher Michael Evans and any other American Christian fundamentals,

if they mind their own business and do it in america thats their problem

they do it in europe theyre own lookout we dont appreciate troublemakin pseudo christian preachers around here

By: cvj

cvj — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:36:02 +0000

Tony, like many others, i comment on matters i feel strongly about. I normally don’t use any other criteria besides that. Anyway, if you scroll back, this topic was touched upon as a by-product of a discussion on the need for blood to be shed in the Philippines. In earlier comments in this and other weblogs, i have also expressed my views on matters related to the Catholic Church and its influence.

By: Tony

Tony — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:44:36 +0000

Anna and cvj… I don’t know if the thought has occurred to you, but Philippines — today, this very minute — is one of the more Christian-fundamentalist oriented countries ever, and the result is not just “living in a repressive society”, what is being impacted is public health. Here are the top-5 issues for American Christian-fundamentals:
– women’s access to abortion services/ Roe-v-Wade
– birth control pills
– separation of Church and state (e.g. displaying the Crucifix in public buildings; religious instructions inside public schools)
– LBGT issues

The two of you will not affect Jerry Falwell, Gary Bauer, much less Texas-based preacher Michael Evans and any other American Christian fundamentals, so why not invest your spit towards lessening the power of Christian-fundamentals over Philippine public policy?

By: Tony

Tony — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 23:52:24 +0000

Anna and c-jugo, Whether or not the war has religious connotations, and even if he was a mass murderer of Iraqi citizens, I believe that Saddam is an issue to be settled by Iraqis and that Dubya Bush should not have gone into Iraq. As logical follow-up, US troops should withdraw out of Iraq — next week if possible, but July 2007 at the very latest. Hopefully, the Iraqi government will have organized enough when US troops leave Iraq. But July 2007 should see no more US troops on Iraqi soil, even if Iraqi-on-Iraqi bloodletting continues.

The both of you have a lot of passion about Christiano- and Islam-fundamentalists. I would have thought, though, that the close-to-the-Philippines issues (Abu Sayyaf and terrorism ala SuperFerry14 AND public health/condom-vs-AIDS and sex-education) would concern you more than, say, whether American Christian fundamentalists match your understanding of the Old and New Testaments.

Anna, I thought, would have related to unequal treatment of women, be it educational opportunities or worship-rituals, that was raised in that Arab-newspaper article.

And Anna.. I put effort in words I write. I did not call any of your friends idiots. What I said was that neither you nor any of your friends can start a war (whether or not any are idiots). And neither of you asked, but my thought is that Iran should hold the West hostage and get as many nuclear reactors as it/Iran can get, but that Iran should not have nuclear weapons. Similar thought regarding North Korea. And Bangkok is a superior to Marikina as a retirement city for US-of-A citizens.

Cheers!!!

By: anna de brux

anna de brux — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:01:46 +0000

Oops, I didn’t realize that cvj had answered the question for me – but I share exactly the same thought on the issue of condoms, completely irresponsible to oppose its use when it could very well help in avoiding the proliferation of aids.

The Catholic Church (Roman, that is) is behaving absolutely unreasonably in this sense!

By: anna de brux

anna de brux — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:59:32 +0000

Tony,

I think, the question I posed here is a lot more poised than your previous rant about me and my “idiot friends” (according to you) so, let’s not go about in circles, shall we?

Answer my question – it’s perfectly simple and straight to the point, don’t you think before we get distracted by condoms and what not – oh well just so we get it out of the way, let me tell you if you really must know, I think the Catholic Church errs in not allowing condoms, etc. – I don’t know why this is important to you but there you are, so now your turn?

“Pray, tell us what you would like to happen or wait, do you think that a Ã¢â‚¬Å“holyÃ¢â‚¬Â war, a modern crusade of sorts, some kind of a head-on confrontation stand (against people of the Islamic faith) should be the order of the day?”