Comments on: Better in Bangkok?

By: janis ian samiano

janis ian samiano — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 22:02:56 +0000

hi sir!

pede pong magtanong? i’m conducting a research po kasi about credibility of Philippine political blogs… may alam po ba kayong mga references tungkol dun?

limitado din po kasi yung mga thesis about blogs sa school… kasi konti pa lang din ang gumagawa ng mga studies na ganto… can’t even find enough literature sa net… pulos po foreign setting…

thanks po

By: Luli

Luli — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:37:56 +0000

Thaksin is far more honorable than Gloria, and less power greedy than Glue-ria!

By: Mistah

Mistah — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:29:15 +0000

Common denominator now: GLORIA MUST RESIGN!!!! Why u like Gloria Joselu? She’s a very bad example! She’s destroying our state’s institutions for her political survival and for her own interest. She must be prosecuted for all the violations she has committed. Her administration operates dirty tricks. And please remember, the shouts now for ‘anti-Gloria’ doesn’t mean ‘anti-state’. Gloria is not the state. She betrays the state & she’s accountable to that.

By: Jon Mariano

Jon Mariano — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:47:51 +0000

I’m quite alright Joselu. Actually I’m just baiting you to spill more nonsense.

By: fencesitter

fencesitter — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:06:42 +0000

joselu,

just because the people never said anything after the election, does not mean the people override the possible culpability of gma in the cheating controversies as the garci tape will prove.

By: joselu

joselu — Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:18:33 +0000

cool lang jon

By: stepping on poop. » On the Fence?

stepping on poop. » On the Fence? — Sun, 12 Mar 2006 04:28:56 +0000

[...] Manolo Quezon writes: Mickeymotoc [sic] bewails the absence of civility, and yet ignores the basic nature of political discourse: you cannot fence-sit on an issue (and decide if you are many, or few, and whether you have a monopoly on honesty or not; if you do, then who is claiming, unreasonably, the moral high ground; if not, then you must concede what you have so far been unwilling to concede; else indeed risk the ire of the committed), and proclaim fence sitting some sort of admirable stand. Fence-sitting is collaboration and support for a cause that one does not oppose; [emphasis mine] it is also welcomed and used by the side that stands to benefit the most from fence-sitting. It strays dangerously close to those who want the Senate, for example, eliminated because it is a â€œdebating clubâ€ – people who dismiss debate in a democracy are betraying a fascistic notion of things. [...]

By: Jon Mariano

Jon Mariano — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:18:24 +0000

I thought I asked a simple question Joselu. You’re not capable of answering in simple words and in a straightforward way.

By: joselu

joselu — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:05:20 +0000

sorry manolo its not the impression i get.but maybe i’ll just read harder.

By: joselu

joselu — Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:02:11 +0000

jon, i will go ahead w/ my life
then maybe i will be reading blogs of people this time complaining again of another personality that goes on & on & on & on
i will jnust see people who will again see other faults that will go on & on & on & on
then i will see people pointing fingers going on & on & on
then i will see groups fighting over the spoils that will go on & on & on
then i will see people who will be washing there hands on & on & on
then i will see people who will be scrating their heads saying akala ko things will change
then they will be passing the fault to someone else again & again & again.
then i will see the people who don’t get what they want making life dificult for the others.